Cargando…
SAGIT(®): clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice—development and results from a pilot study
PURPOSE: The SAGIT instrument is a comprehensive clinician-reported outcome instrument assessing key features of acromegaly: signs and symptoms, associated comorbidities; growth hormone levels; insulin-like growth factor-1 levels; and tumor profile. The SAGIT instrument has been designed to assist e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26377024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0681-2 |
_version_ | 1782409832708440064 |
---|---|
author | Giustina, Andrea Bevan, John S. Bronstein, Marcello D. Casanueva, Felipe F. Chanson, Philippe Petersenn, Stephan Thanh, Xuan-Mai Truong Sert, Caroline Houchard, Aude Guillemin, Isabelle Melmed, Shlomo |
author_facet | Giustina, Andrea Bevan, John S. Bronstein, Marcello D. Casanueva, Felipe F. Chanson, Philippe Petersenn, Stephan Thanh, Xuan-Mai Truong Sert, Caroline Houchard, Aude Guillemin, Isabelle Melmed, Shlomo |
author_sort | Giustina, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The SAGIT instrument is a comprehensive clinician-reported outcome instrument assessing key features of acromegaly: signs and symptoms, associated comorbidities; growth hormone levels; insulin-like growth factor-1 levels; and tumor profile. The SAGIT instrument has been designed to assist endocrinologists managing acromegaly in practice. Here, we report on pre-testing (to assess ease of understanding and acceptability) and a pilot study (to assess relevance, ease of use, and utility in real-life conditions) (NCT02231593). METHODS: For pre-testing, 11 endocrinologists completed the SAGIT instrument using patient medical records and were also interviewed. They subsequently completed a PRAgmatic Content and face validity Test (PRAC-Test(©)) to report their experiences using SAGIT, and feedback was used to revise the instrument. In the pilot study, nine endocrinologists completed the SAGIT instrument in real-time with patients belonging to three different categories (stable/controlled, active/uncontrolled acromegaly, treatment-naïve), while four completed the instrument based on medical-record review. All participants then completed the PRAC-Test(©) and their feedback was used to update the instrument. RESULTS: The SAGIT instrument was well accepted by endocrinologists, with most indicating that it was concise, practical, easy to understand, useful for assessing treatment response, and valuable as a component of the patient’s medical record. The pilot study confirmed the instrument’s acceptability, utility, and ease of use, and indicated its potential for distinguishing acromegaly clinical stages. CONCLUSIONS: The SAGIT instrument is promising as a tool for use by endocrinologists in everyday practice to assess the status and evolution of disease in patients with acromegaly and to guide treatment decision-making. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11102-015-0681-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4710645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47106452016-01-19 SAGIT(®): clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice—development and results from a pilot study Giustina, Andrea Bevan, John S. Bronstein, Marcello D. Casanueva, Felipe F. Chanson, Philippe Petersenn, Stephan Thanh, Xuan-Mai Truong Sert, Caroline Houchard, Aude Guillemin, Isabelle Melmed, Shlomo Pituitary Article PURPOSE: The SAGIT instrument is a comprehensive clinician-reported outcome instrument assessing key features of acromegaly: signs and symptoms, associated comorbidities; growth hormone levels; insulin-like growth factor-1 levels; and tumor profile. The SAGIT instrument has been designed to assist endocrinologists managing acromegaly in practice. Here, we report on pre-testing (to assess ease of understanding and acceptability) and a pilot study (to assess relevance, ease of use, and utility in real-life conditions) (NCT02231593). METHODS: For pre-testing, 11 endocrinologists completed the SAGIT instrument using patient medical records and were also interviewed. They subsequently completed a PRAgmatic Content and face validity Test (PRAC-Test(©)) to report their experiences using SAGIT, and feedback was used to revise the instrument. In the pilot study, nine endocrinologists completed the SAGIT instrument in real-time with patients belonging to three different categories (stable/controlled, active/uncontrolled acromegaly, treatment-naïve), while four completed the instrument based on medical-record review. All participants then completed the PRAC-Test(©) and their feedback was used to update the instrument. RESULTS: The SAGIT instrument was well accepted by endocrinologists, with most indicating that it was concise, practical, easy to understand, useful for assessing treatment response, and valuable as a component of the patient’s medical record. The pilot study confirmed the instrument’s acceptability, utility, and ease of use, and indicated its potential for distinguishing acromegaly clinical stages. CONCLUSIONS: The SAGIT instrument is promising as a tool for use by endocrinologists in everyday practice to assess the status and evolution of disease in patients with acromegaly and to guide treatment decision-making. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11102-015-0681-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2015-09-16 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4710645/ /pubmed/26377024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0681-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Giustina, Andrea Bevan, John S. Bronstein, Marcello D. Casanueva, Felipe F. Chanson, Philippe Petersenn, Stephan Thanh, Xuan-Mai Truong Sert, Caroline Houchard, Aude Guillemin, Isabelle Melmed, Shlomo SAGIT(®): clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice—development and results from a pilot study |
title | SAGIT(®): clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice—development and results from a pilot study |
title_full | SAGIT(®): clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice—development and results from a pilot study |
title_fullStr | SAGIT(®): clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice—development and results from a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | SAGIT(®): clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice—development and results from a pilot study |
title_short | SAGIT(®): clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice—development and results from a pilot study |
title_sort | sagit(®): clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice—development and results from a pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26377024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0681-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giustinaandrea sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT bevanjohns sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT bronsteinmarcellod sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT casanuevafelipef sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT chansonphilippe sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT petersennstephan sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT thanhxuanmaitruong sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT sertcaroline sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT houchardaude sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT guilleminisabelle sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT melmedshlomo sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy AT sagitclinicianreportedoutcomeinstrumentformanagingacromegalyinclinicalpracticedevelopmentandresultsfromapilotstudy |