Cargando…

Is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? Analysis of 24,571 patients from the Herniamed Registry

INTRODUCTION: Several analyses of hernia registries have demonstrated that patients older than 65 years have significantly higher perioperative complication rates compared with patients up to the age of 65. To date, no special analyses of endoscopic/laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery or of the rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayer, F., Lechner, M., Adolf, D., Öfner, D., Köhler, G., Fortelny, R., Bittner, R., Köckerling, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25899813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4209-7
_version_ 1782409836730777600
author Mayer, F.
Lechner, M.
Adolf, D.
Öfner, D.
Köhler, G.
Fortelny, R.
Bittner, R.
Köckerling, F.
author_facet Mayer, F.
Lechner, M.
Adolf, D.
Öfner, D.
Köhler, G.
Fortelny, R.
Bittner, R.
Köckerling, F.
author_sort Mayer, F.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Several analyses of hernia registries have demonstrated that patients older than 65 years have significantly higher perioperative complication rates compared with patients up to the age of 65. To date, no special analyses of endoscopic/laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery or of the relevant additional influence factors have been carried out. Besides, there is no definition to determine whether 65 years should really be considered to be the age limit. METHODS: In the Herniamed Hernia Registry, it was possible to identify 24,571 patients with a primary inguinal hernia and aged at least 16 years who had been operated on between September 1, 2009, and April 15, 2013, using either the TAPP technique (n = 17,214) or TEP technique (n = 7,357). Patients in the age group up to and including 65 years (≤65 years) were compared with those older than 65 years (>65 years) in terms of their perioperative outcome. That was done first using unadjusted analysis and then multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Unadjusted analysis revealed significantly different results for the intraoperative (1.19 vs 1.60 %; p = 0,010), postoperative surgical (2.72 vs 4.59 %; p < 0.001) and postoperative general complications (0.85 vs 1.98 %; p < 0.001) as well as for complication-related reoperations (1.07 vs 1.37 %; p = 0,044), which were more favorable in the ≤65 years age group. However, in multivariable analysis, it was not possible to confirm that for the intraoperative complications or the reoperations. Reoperations were needed more often for bilateral procedures (p < 0.001; OR 2.154 [1.699; 2.730]), higher ASA classification (IV vs I: p = 0.004; OR 6.001 [1.786; 20.167]), larger hernia defect and scrotal hernias. The impact of these factors, in addition to that of age >65 years, was also reflected in the postoperative complication rates. The age limit for increased onset of perioperative complication rates tends to be more than 80 rather than 65 years. CONCLUSION: The higher perioperative complication rate associated with endoscopic/laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery in patients older than 65 years is of multifactorial genesis and is observed in particular as from the age of 80 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4710662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47106622016-01-19 Is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? Analysis of 24,571 patients from the Herniamed Registry Mayer, F. Lechner, M. Adolf, D. Öfner, D. Köhler, G. Fortelny, R. Bittner, R. Köckerling, F. Surg Endosc Article INTRODUCTION: Several analyses of hernia registries have demonstrated that patients older than 65 years have significantly higher perioperative complication rates compared with patients up to the age of 65. To date, no special analyses of endoscopic/laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery or of the relevant additional influence factors have been carried out. Besides, there is no definition to determine whether 65 years should really be considered to be the age limit. METHODS: In the Herniamed Hernia Registry, it was possible to identify 24,571 patients with a primary inguinal hernia and aged at least 16 years who had been operated on between September 1, 2009, and April 15, 2013, using either the TAPP technique (n = 17,214) or TEP technique (n = 7,357). Patients in the age group up to and including 65 years (≤65 years) were compared with those older than 65 years (>65 years) in terms of their perioperative outcome. That was done first using unadjusted analysis and then multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Unadjusted analysis revealed significantly different results for the intraoperative (1.19 vs 1.60 %; p = 0,010), postoperative surgical (2.72 vs 4.59 %; p < 0.001) and postoperative general complications (0.85 vs 1.98 %; p < 0.001) as well as for complication-related reoperations (1.07 vs 1.37 %; p = 0,044), which were more favorable in the ≤65 years age group. However, in multivariable analysis, it was not possible to confirm that for the intraoperative complications or the reoperations. Reoperations were needed more often for bilateral procedures (p < 0.001; OR 2.154 [1.699; 2.730]), higher ASA classification (IV vs I: p = 0.004; OR 6.001 [1.786; 20.167]), larger hernia defect and scrotal hernias. The impact of these factors, in addition to that of age >65 years, was also reflected in the postoperative complication rates. The age limit for increased onset of perioperative complication rates tends to be more than 80 rather than 65 years. CONCLUSION: The higher perioperative complication rate associated with endoscopic/laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery in patients older than 65 years is of multifactorial genesis and is observed in particular as from the age of 80 years. Springer US 2015-04-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4710662/ /pubmed/25899813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4209-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Mayer, F.
Lechner, M.
Adolf, D.
Öfner, D.
Köhler, G.
Fortelny, R.
Bittner, R.
Köckerling, F.
Is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? Analysis of 24,571 patients from the Herniamed Registry
title Is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? Analysis of 24,571 patients from the Herniamed Registry
title_full Is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? Analysis of 24,571 patients from the Herniamed Registry
title_fullStr Is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? Analysis of 24,571 patients from the Herniamed Registry
title_full_unstemmed Is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? Analysis of 24,571 patients from the Herniamed Registry
title_short Is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? Analysis of 24,571 patients from the Herniamed Registry
title_sort is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? analysis of 24,571 patients from the herniamed registry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25899813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4209-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mayerf istheageof65yearsariskfactorforendoscopictreatmentofprimaryinguinalherniaanalysisof24571patientsfromtheherniamedregistry
AT lechnerm istheageof65yearsariskfactorforendoscopictreatmentofprimaryinguinalherniaanalysisof24571patientsfromtheherniamedregistry
AT adolfd istheageof65yearsariskfactorforendoscopictreatmentofprimaryinguinalherniaanalysisof24571patientsfromtheherniamedregistry
AT ofnerd istheageof65yearsariskfactorforendoscopictreatmentofprimaryinguinalherniaanalysisof24571patientsfromtheherniamedregistry
AT kohlerg istheageof65yearsariskfactorforendoscopictreatmentofprimaryinguinalherniaanalysisof24571patientsfromtheherniamedregistry
AT fortelnyr istheageof65yearsariskfactorforendoscopictreatmentofprimaryinguinalherniaanalysisof24571patientsfromtheherniamedregistry
AT bittnerr istheageof65yearsariskfactorforendoscopictreatmentofprimaryinguinalherniaanalysisof24571patientsfromtheherniamedregistry
AT kockerlingf istheageof65yearsariskfactorforendoscopictreatmentofprimaryinguinalherniaanalysisof24571patientsfromtheherniamedregistry