Cargando…

A supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility and pilot a supported psychoeducational tool to improve parent and child mental health following discharge from a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), in preparation for a large randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: Feasibility assessment and single-centre, pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Als, Lorraine C, Nadel, Simon, Cooper, Mehrengise, Vickers, Bea, Garralda, M Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26715482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009581
_version_ 1782409861272698880
author Als, Lorraine C
Nadel, Simon
Cooper, Mehrengise
Vickers, Bea
Garralda, M Elena
author_facet Als, Lorraine C
Nadel, Simon
Cooper, Mehrengise
Vickers, Bea
Garralda, M Elena
author_sort Als, Lorraine C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility and pilot a supported psychoeducational tool to improve parent and child mental health following discharge from a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), in preparation for a large randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: Feasibility assessment and single-centre, parallel group, pilot RCT. A concealed computer generated list was used to randomise participants, with an allocation of 2:1 in favour of the intervention. SETTING: A PICU in an acute care hospital in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 31 parents of children aged 4–16 years-old admitted to PICU. INTERVENTION: Parents received a psychoeducational tool supported by a telephone call. The psychoeducational tool outlined the possible psychological reactions in children and parents alongside management advice. The telephone call addressed each family's postdischarge experience, reinforced the psychoeducational material and encouraged parents to put into practice the advice given. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number of feasibility criteria successfully met (linked to the intervention and the study design). Secondary outcomes were questionnaire data collected at 3–6-month follow-up assessing mental health in parents and children. RESULTS: 31 parents were randomised (intervention n=22; treatment as usual, TAU n=9). 23 parents were included in the analysis of secondary outcomes (intervention n=17; TAU n=6). 3 (of 6) intervention and 1 (of 6) study design feasibility criteria were fully met. All unmet criteria could be addressed with minor or significant modifications to the protocol. At follow-up there was a tendency for parents who received the intervention to report lower post-traumatic stress symptoms in themselves and fewer emotional and behavioural difficulties in their children than TAU parents. This needs to be explored in a fully powered trial. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility and pilot RCT provided valuable information on the intervention and trial design for a full RCT. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01737021; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4710808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47108082016-01-28 A supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial Als, Lorraine C Nadel, Simon Cooper, Mehrengise Vickers, Bea Garralda, M Elena BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility and pilot a supported psychoeducational tool to improve parent and child mental health following discharge from a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), in preparation for a large randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: Feasibility assessment and single-centre, parallel group, pilot RCT. A concealed computer generated list was used to randomise participants, with an allocation of 2:1 in favour of the intervention. SETTING: A PICU in an acute care hospital in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 31 parents of children aged 4–16 years-old admitted to PICU. INTERVENTION: Parents received a psychoeducational tool supported by a telephone call. The psychoeducational tool outlined the possible psychological reactions in children and parents alongside management advice. The telephone call addressed each family's postdischarge experience, reinforced the psychoeducational material and encouraged parents to put into practice the advice given. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number of feasibility criteria successfully met (linked to the intervention and the study design). Secondary outcomes were questionnaire data collected at 3–6-month follow-up assessing mental health in parents and children. RESULTS: 31 parents were randomised (intervention n=22; treatment as usual, TAU n=9). 23 parents were included in the analysis of secondary outcomes (intervention n=17; TAU n=6). 3 (of 6) intervention and 1 (of 6) study design feasibility criteria were fully met. All unmet criteria could be addressed with minor or significant modifications to the protocol. At follow-up there was a tendency for parents who received the intervention to report lower post-traumatic stress symptoms in themselves and fewer emotional and behavioural difficulties in their children than TAU parents. This needs to be explored in a fully powered trial. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility and pilot RCT provided valuable information on the intervention and trial design for a full RCT. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01737021; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4710808/ /pubmed/26715482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009581 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Als, Lorraine C
Nadel, Simon
Cooper, Mehrengise
Vickers, Bea
Garralda, M Elena
A supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial
title A supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full A supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr A supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short A supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26715482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009581
work_keys_str_mv AT alslorrainec asupportedpsychoeducationalinterventiontoimprovefamilymentalhealthfollowingdischargefrompaediatricintensivecarefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nadelsimon asupportedpsychoeducationalinterventiontoimprovefamilymentalhealthfollowingdischargefrompaediatricintensivecarefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coopermehrengise asupportedpsychoeducationalinterventiontoimprovefamilymentalhealthfollowingdischargefrompaediatricintensivecarefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vickersbea asupportedpsychoeducationalinterventiontoimprovefamilymentalhealthfollowingdischargefrompaediatricintensivecarefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT garraldamelena asupportedpsychoeducationalinterventiontoimprovefamilymentalhealthfollowingdischargefrompaediatricintensivecarefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT alslorrainec supportedpsychoeducationalinterventiontoimprovefamilymentalhealthfollowingdischargefrompaediatricintensivecarefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nadelsimon supportedpsychoeducationalinterventiontoimprovefamilymentalhealthfollowingdischargefrompaediatricintensivecarefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coopermehrengise supportedpsychoeducationalinterventiontoimprovefamilymentalhealthfollowingdischargefrompaediatricintensivecarefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vickersbea supportedpsychoeducationalinterventiontoimprovefamilymentalhealthfollowingdischargefrompaediatricintensivecarefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT garraldamelena supportedpsychoeducationalinterventiontoimprovefamilymentalhealthfollowingdischargefrompaediatricintensivecarefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial