Cargando…
Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic survey of the methodological literature to identify recommended approaches for how and what randomised clinical trial (RCT) authors should report on missing participant data and, on the basis of these approaches, to propose guidance for RCT authors. METHODS: We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008431 |
_version_ | 1782409863130775552 |
---|---|
author | Akl, Elie A Shawwa, Khaled Kahale, Lara A Agoritsas, Thomas Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Busse, Jason W Carrasco–Labra, Alonso Ebrahim, Shanil Johnston, Bradley C Neumann, Ignacio Sola, Ivan Sun, Xin Vandvik, Per Zhang, Yuqing Alonso-Coello, Pablo Guyatt, Gordon H |
author_facet | Akl, Elie A Shawwa, Khaled Kahale, Lara A Agoritsas, Thomas Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Busse, Jason W Carrasco–Labra, Alonso Ebrahim, Shanil Johnston, Bradley C Neumann, Ignacio Sola, Ivan Sun, Xin Vandvik, Per Zhang, Yuqing Alonso-Coello, Pablo Guyatt, Gordon H |
author_sort | Akl, Elie A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic survey of the methodological literature to identify recommended approaches for how and what randomised clinical trial (RCT) authors should report on missing participant data and, on the basis of these approaches, to propose guidance for RCT authors. METHODS: We defined missing participant data (MPD) as missing outcome data for trial participants. We considered both categorical and continuous outcome data. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Methodology Register for articles in which authors proposed approaches to reporting MPD from RCTs. We selected eligible articles independently and in duplicate and extracted data in duplicate. Using an iterative process of discussion and revisions, we used the findings to develop guidance. RESULTS: Of 10 501 unique citations identified, 13 articles reporting on 10 approaches proved eligible. The identified approaches recommend reporting the following aspects (from most to least frequently recommended): number of participants with MPD (n=10), reasons for MPD (n=7), methods used to handle MPD in the analysis (n=4), flow of participants (n=3), pattern of missingness (eg, whether at random) (n=3), differences in rates of MPD between trial arms (n=2), differences between participants with and without MPD (n=2), results of any sensitivity analyses (n=2), implication of MPD on interpreting the results (n=2) and methods used to prevent missing data (n=1). We propose a guide with nine items related to reporting the number, reasons, patterns, analytical methods and interpretation of MPD. CONCLUSIONS: Most identified approaches invite trial authors to report the extent of MPD and the underlying reasons. Fewer approaches focus on reporting missingness patterns, methods for handling MPD and implications of MPD on results. Our proposed guidance could help RCT authors to better report, and readers to better identify participants with missing data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4710817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47108172016-01-28 Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide Akl, Elie A Shawwa, Khaled Kahale, Lara A Agoritsas, Thomas Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Busse, Jason W Carrasco–Labra, Alonso Ebrahim, Shanil Johnston, Bradley C Neumann, Ignacio Sola, Ivan Sun, Xin Vandvik, Per Zhang, Yuqing Alonso-Coello, Pablo Guyatt, Gordon H BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic survey of the methodological literature to identify recommended approaches for how and what randomised clinical trial (RCT) authors should report on missing participant data and, on the basis of these approaches, to propose guidance for RCT authors. METHODS: We defined missing participant data (MPD) as missing outcome data for trial participants. We considered both categorical and continuous outcome data. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Methodology Register for articles in which authors proposed approaches to reporting MPD from RCTs. We selected eligible articles independently and in duplicate and extracted data in duplicate. Using an iterative process of discussion and revisions, we used the findings to develop guidance. RESULTS: Of 10 501 unique citations identified, 13 articles reporting on 10 approaches proved eligible. The identified approaches recommend reporting the following aspects (from most to least frequently recommended): number of participants with MPD (n=10), reasons for MPD (n=7), methods used to handle MPD in the analysis (n=4), flow of participants (n=3), pattern of missingness (eg, whether at random) (n=3), differences in rates of MPD between trial arms (n=2), differences between participants with and without MPD (n=2), results of any sensitivity analyses (n=2), implication of MPD on interpreting the results (n=2) and methods used to prevent missing data (n=1). We propose a guide with nine items related to reporting the number, reasons, patterns, analytical methods and interpretation of MPD. CONCLUSIONS: Most identified approaches invite trial authors to report the extent of MPD and the underlying reasons. Fewer approaches focus on reporting missingness patterns, methods for handling MPD and implications of MPD on results. Our proposed guidance could help RCT authors to better report, and readers to better identify participants with missing data. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4710817/ /pubmed/26719310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008431 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Akl, Elie A Shawwa, Khaled Kahale, Lara A Agoritsas, Thomas Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Busse, Jason W Carrasco–Labra, Alonso Ebrahim, Shanil Johnston, Bradley C Neumann, Ignacio Sola, Ivan Sun, Xin Vandvik, Per Zhang, Yuqing Alonso-Coello, Pablo Guyatt, Gordon H Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide |
title | Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide |
title_full | Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide |
title_fullStr | Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide |
title_short | Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide |
title_sort | reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akleliea reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT shawwakhaled reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT kahalelaraa reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT agoritsasthomas reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT brignardellopetersenromina reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT bussejasonw reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT carrascolabraalonso reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT ebrahimshanil reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT johnstonbradleyc reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT neumannignacio reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT solaivan reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT sunxin reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT vandvikper reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT zhangyuqing reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT alonsocoellopablo reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide AT guyattgordonh reportingmissingparticipantdatainrandomisedtrialssystematicsurveyofthemethodologicalliteratureandaproposedguide |