Cargando…

Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic survey of the methodological literature to identify recommended approaches for how and what randomised clinical trial (RCT) authors should report on missing participant data and, on the basis of these approaches, to propose guidance for RCT authors. METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Akl, Elie A, Shawwa, Khaled, Kahale, Lara A, Agoritsas, Thomas, Brignardello-Petersen, Romina, Busse, Jason W, Carrasco–Labra, Alonso, Ebrahim, Shanil, Johnston, Bradley C, Neumann, Ignacio, Sola, Ivan, Sun, Xin, Vandvik, Per, Zhang, Yuqing, Alonso-Coello, Pablo, Guyatt, Gordon H
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:	Epidemiology
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008431

Ejemplares similares

Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches
por: Akl, Elie A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study
por: Akl, Elie A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey
por: Akl, Elie A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A methodological survey of the analysis, reporting and interpretation of Absolute Risk ReductiOn in systematic revieWs (ARROW): a study protocol
por: Alonso-Coello, Pablo, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Correction: A methodological survey of the analysis, reporting and interpretation of Absolute Risk ReductiOn in systematic revieWs (ARROW): a study protocol
por: Alonso-Coello, Pablo, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Addressing Dichotomous Data for Participants Excluded from Trial Analysis: A Guide for Systematic Reviewers
por: Akl, Elie A., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Systematic review on reducing missed opportunities for vaccinations in Latin America
por: Tampi, Malavika, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?
por: Vandvik, Per Olav, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol
por: Alonso-Coello, Pablo, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Comparison between the standard and a new alternative format of the Summary-of-Findings tables in Cochrane review users: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
por: Carrasco-Labra, Alonso, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels
por: Neumann, Ignacio, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Application of minimal important differences in degenerative knee disease outcomes: a systematic review and case study to inform BMJ Rapid Recommendations
por: Devji, Tahira, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Corticosteroids for treatment of sore throat: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
por: Sadeghirad, Behnam, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens
por: Agoritsas, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey
por: Agoritsas, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
por: Hao, Qiukui, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol
por: Johnston, Bradley C, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Requirements of Clinical Journals for Authors’ Disclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest: A Cross Sectional Study
por: Shawwa, Khaled, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Multilayered and digitally structured presentation formats of trustworthy recommendations: a combined survey and randomised trial
por: Brandt, Linn, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey
por: Kahale, Lara A, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Decision aids linked to evidence summaries and clinical practice guidelines: results from user-testing in clinical encounters
por: Heen, Anja Fog, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

When applying GRADE, how do we decide the target of certainty of evidence rating?
por: Zeng, Linan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study
por: Kahale, Lara A, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study
por: Devji, Tahira, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Knee arthroscopy versus conservative management in patients with degenerative knee disease: a systematic review
por: Brignardello-Petersen, Romina, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Methodological survey of designed uneven randomization trials (DU-RANDOM): a protocol
por: Wu, Darong, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Incretin treatment and risk of pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies
por: Li, Ling, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Arthroplasty versus Arthrodesis for Single-Level Cervical Spondylosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Fallah, Aria, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Decision-Making about Healthcare Related Tests and Diagnostic Strategies: User Testing of GRADE Evidence Tables
por: Mustafa, Reem A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Patients Receiving Disability Benefits: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
por: Ebrahim, Shanil, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Correction: Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Patients Receiving Disability Benefits: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
por: Ebrahim, Shanil, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey
por: Khamis, Assem M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach
por: Zhang, Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications
por: Kasenda, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Agreements between Industry and Academia on Publication Rights: A Retrospective Study of Protocols and Publications of Randomized Clinical Trials
por: Kasenda, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Use of tocilizumab and sarilumab alone or in combination with corticosteroids for covid-19: systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Zeraatkar, Dena, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

How oral health care organizations formulate actionable statements to inform practice and policy: A protocol for a systematic survey
por: Verdugo-Paiva, Francisca, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Trustworthy guidelines – excellent; customized care tools – even better
por: Elwyn, Glyn, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Meta‐analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non‐perforated acute appendicitis
por: Sallinen, V., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluation of the use of GRADE in dentistry systematic reviews and its impact on conclusions: a protocol for a methodological study
por: Ibrahim, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_b4cv4ba237se4tpuioq3pl71vu