Cargando…

Does a research article's country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers

OBJECTIVES: The source of research may influence one's interpretation of it in either negative or positive ways, however, there are no robust experiments to determine how source impacts on one's judgment of the research article. We determine the impact of source on respondents’ assessment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Harris, M, Macinko, J, Jimenez, G, Mahfoud, M, Anderson, C
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008993

Ejemplares similares

Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
por: Maggio, Lauren A, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers
por: Rohwer, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers’ perceptions of clinical educational articles: a randomised controlled trial
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Scientific research output in orthopaedics from China and other top-ranking countries: a 10-year survey of the literature
por: Zou, Yuming, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers' perceptions of clinical educational articles: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

How often do US-based human subjects research studies register on time, and how often do they post their results? A statistical analysis of the Clinicaltrials.gov database
por: Gill, Christopher J
Publicado: (2012)

Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis
por: Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals
por: Rohwer, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers
por: Price, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers
por: Tijdink, J K, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting of patient involvement: a mixed-methods analysis of current practice in health research publications using a targeted search strategy
por: Weschke, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey
por: Cobey, Kelly D, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Employing diffusion of innovation theory for ‘not missing the mass’ in community-engaged research
por: Turin, Tanvir C, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research
por: Superchi, Cecilia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Quantifying gender disparity in physician authorship among commentary articles in three high-impact medical journals: an observational study
por: Mamtani, Mira, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Improving the evaluation of worldwide biomedical research output: classification method and standardised bibliometric indicators by disease
por: van de Laar, Lissy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
por: Catalá-López, Ferrán, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Training patients to review scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: an observational study
por: Ivlev, Ilya, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Thinker, Soldier, Scribe: cross-sectional study of researchers' roles and author order in the Annals of Internal Medicine
por: Perneger, Thomas V, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Performance curves of medical researchers during their career: analysis of scientific production from a retrospective cohort
por: Duclos, Antoine, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The impact of a streamlined funding application process on application time: two cross-sectional surveys of Australian researchers
por: Barnett, Adrian G, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Does knowledge have a half-life? An observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications
por: Chow, Natalie L.Y., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Differences in reporting serious adverse events in industry sponsored clinical trial registries and journal articles on antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs: a cross-sectional study
por: Hughes, Shannon, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
por: Bassler, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessment of the extent of unpublished studies in prognostic factor research: a systematic review of p53 immunohistochemistry in bladder cancer as an example
por: Sekula, Peggy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open access publishing each year
por: Ellingson, Mallory K., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Quantitative investigation of inappropriate regression model construction and the importance of medical statistics experts in observational medical research: a cross-sectional study
por: Nojima, Masanori, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Protocol for a meta-research study of protocols for diet or nutrition-related trials published in indexed journals: general aspects of study design, rationale and reporting limitations
por: Silva, Flávia Moraes, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study
por: Kicinski, Michal
Publicado: (2014)

Time to publication for publicly funded clinical trials in Australia: an observational study
por: Strand, Linn Beate, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey
por: Tam, Wilson W S, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cross-sectional study of Pfizer-sponsored clinical trials: assessment of time to publication and publication history
por: Mooney, LaVerne A, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Survey of quality and clarity of methods and results reporting in 1 year of intervention studies published in high-impact medical and psychiatric journals
por: Ravichandran, Caitlin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Gender and ethnic differences in publication of BMJ letters to the editor: an observational study using machine learning
por: Zeina, Mohamad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting of retrospective registration in clinical trial publications: a cross-sectional study of German trials
por: Haslberger, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Characteristics and publication fate of unregistered and retrospectively registered clinical trials submitted to The BMJ over 4 years
por: Loder, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_1vr2vhio3ud7a6btpuv1s248e2