Cargando…

Can integrative weaning index be a routine predictor for weaning success?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of integrative weaning index (IWI) as a predictor of weaning success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled observer-blinded study and carried out on 120 patients of both sexes; patients who received mechanical ventilation for more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Baradey, Ghada F., El-Shmaa, Nagat S., Ganna, Salwa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4711201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816445
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.171352
_version_ 1782409927534313472
author El-Baradey, Ghada F.
El-Shmaa, Nagat S.
Ganna, Salwa A.
author_facet El-Baradey, Ghada F.
El-Shmaa, Nagat S.
Ganna, Salwa A.
author_sort El-Baradey, Ghada F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of integrative weaning index (IWI) as a predictor of weaning success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled observer-blinded study and carried out on 120 patients of both sexes; patients who received mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h and met defined criteria for a weaning trial, underwent a 2-h spontaneous breathing trial with either IWI plus routine criteria of weaning (Group I n = 60) or routine criteria of weaning alone (control group) (Group C n = 60), in Group C the IWI was measured retrospective as it is not used in weaning decision. Those tolerated the trial would be immediately extubated. The primary outcome measure was the ability to maintain spontaneous, unassisted breathing for more than 48 h after extubation. Secondary outcome measures were the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The mean duration (hours) of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay (days) were significantly shorter in the Group I where the IWI was used (83.6 ± 34.3 vs. 97.49 ± 47.2 h, P = 0.002 and 5.5 ± 1.6 vs. 7.12 ± 2.3 days, P = 0.03, respectively). Weaning success rate was significantly higher in the Group I (53 vs. 34, P = 0.0001) while weaning failure rate was significantly lower in the Group I C (7 vs. 26, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: IWI is a strong predictor of both successful and failed weaning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4711201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47112012016-01-26 Can integrative weaning index be a routine predictor for weaning success? El-Baradey, Ghada F. El-Shmaa, Nagat S. Ganna, Salwa A. Indian J Crit Care Med Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of integrative weaning index (IWI) as a predictor of weaning success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled observer-blinded study and carried out on 120 patients of both sexes; patients who received mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h and met defined criteria for a weaning trial, underwent a 2-h spontaneous breathing trial with either IWI plus routine criteria of weaning (Group I n = 60) or routine criteria of weaning alone (control group) (Group C n = 60), in Group C the IWI was measured retrospective as it is not used in weaning decision. Those tolerated the trial would be immediately extubated. The primary outcome measure was the ability to maintain spontaneous, unassisted breathing for more than 48 h after extubation. Secondary outcome measures were the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The mean duration (hours) of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay (days) were significantly shorter in the Group I where the IWI was used (83.6 ± 34.3 vs. 97.49 ± 47.2 h, P = 0.002 and 5.5 ± 1.6 vs. 7.12 ± 2.3 days, P = 0.03, respectively). Weaning success rate was significantly higher in the Group I (53 vs. 34, P = 0.0001) while weaning failure rate was significantly lower in the Group I C (7 vs. 26, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: IWI is a strong predictor of both successful and failed weaning. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4711201/ /pubmed/26816445 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.171352 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
El-Baradey, Ghada F.
El-Shmaa, Nagat S.
Ganna, Salwa A.
Can integrative weaning index be a routine predictor for weaning success?
title Can integrative weaning index be a routine predictor for weaning success?
title_full Can integrative weaning index be a routine predictor for weaning success?
title_fullStr Can integrative weaning index be a routine predictor for weaning success?
title_full_unstemmed Can integrative weaning index be a routine predictor for weaning success?
title_short Can integrative weaning index be a routine predictor for weaning success?
title_sort can integrative weaning index be a routine predictor for weaning success?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4711201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816445
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.171352
work_keys_str_mv AT elbaradeyghadaf canintegrativeweaningindexbearoutinepredictorforweaningsuccess
AT elshmaanagats canintegrativeweaningindexbearoutinepredictorforweaningsuccess
AT gannasalwaa canintegrativeweaningindexbearoutinepredictorforweaningsuccess