Cargando…

A comparative study on psycho-socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression

BACKGROUND: Several studies have revealed significant differences between bipolar (BP) and unipolar depression (UP). Misdiagnosing BP depression results in suboptimal symptom resolution, induction of manic switch, mixed state, or accelerated cycling. This study compares various psycho-socio-demograp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nisha, A., Sathesh, V., Punnoose, Varghese P., Varghese, P. Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4711241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26813699
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.171842
_version_ 1782409936525852672
author Nisha, A.
Sathesh, V.
Punnoose, Varghese P.
Varghese, P. Joseph
author_facet Nisha, A.
Sathesh, V.
Punnoose, Varghese P.
Varghese, P. Joseph
author_sort Nisha, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several studies have revealed significant differences between bipolar (BP) and unipolar depression (UP). Misdiagnosing BP depression results in suboptimal symptom resolution, induction of manic switch, mixed state, or accelerated cycling. This study compares various psycho-socio-demographic, longitudinal course, and phenomenological factors associated with BP and UP depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared 30 UP and 30 BP depression patients using a specially designed intake proforma, International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic criteria for research, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-21 (HAMD-21), Hypomania Checklist-32 Questionnaire (HCL-32), Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), and Kuppuswami's socioeconomic status scale. RESULTS: BP depression group consisted of mostly males, with earlier age of onset of illness, longer illness duration, frequent episodes, hospitalizations and psychotic symptoms. The total HAM-D score and 4 HAM-D item scores–psychomotor retardation, insight, diurnal variation of symptoms and its severity, and paranoid symptoms were significantly higher in this group. Binary logistic regression identified the age of onset, the total duration of illness, frequency of affective episodes, and presence of delusions as predictors of bipolarity (odds ratio = 1.327; 1.517; 0.062; 0.137). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of clinical markers of bipolarity from large scale prospective studies is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4711241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47112412016-01-26 A comparative study on psycho-socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression Nisha, A. Sathesh, V. Punnoose, Varghese P. Varghese, P. Joseph Indian J Psychiatry Original Article BACKGROUND: Several studies have revealed significant differences between bipolar (BP) and unipolar depression (UP). Misdiagnosing BP depression results in suboptimal symptom resolution, induction of manic switch, mixed state, or accelerated cycling. This study compares various psycho-socio-demographic, longitudinal course, and phenomenological factors associated with BP and UP depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared 30 UP and 30 BP depression patients using a specially designed intake proforma, International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic criteria for research, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-21 (HAMD-21), Hypomania Checklist-32 Questionnaire (HCL-32), Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), and Kuppuswami's socioeconomic status scale. RESULTS: BP depression group consisted of mostly males, with earlier age of onset of illness, longer illness duration, frequent episodes, hospitalizations and psychotic symptoms. The total HAM-D score and 4 HAM-D item scores–psychomotor retardation, insight, diurnal variation of symptoms and its severity, and paranoid symptoms were significantly higher in this group. Binary logistic regression identified the age of onset, the total duration of illness, frequency of affective episodes, and presence of delusions as predictors of bipolarity (odds ratio = 1.327; 1.517; 0.062; 0.137). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of clinical markers of bipolarity from large scale prospective studies is needed. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4711241/ /pubmed/26813699 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.171842 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Psychiatry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nisha, A.
Sathesh, V.
Punnoose, Varghese P.
Varghese, P. Joseph
A comparative study on psycho-socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression
title A comparative study on psycho-socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression
title_full A comparative study on psycho-socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression
title_fullStr A comparative study on psycho-socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on psycho-socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression
title_short A comparative study on psycho-socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression
title_sort comparative study on psycho-socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4711241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26813699
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.171842
work_keys_str_mv AT nishaa acomparativestudyonpsychosociodemographicandclinicalprofileofpatientswithbipolarversusunipolardepression
AT satheshv acomparativestudyonpsychosociodemographicandclinicalprofileofpatientswithbipolarversusunipolardepression
AT punnoosevarghesep acomparativestudyonpsychosociodemographicandclinicalprofileofpatientswithbipolarversusunipolardepression
AT varghesepjoseph acomparativestudyonpsychosociodemographicandclinicalprofileofpatientswithbipolarversusunipolardepression
AT nishaa comparativestudyonpsychosociodemographicandclinicalprofileofpatientswithbipolarversusunipolardepression
AT satheshv comparativestudyonpsychosociodemographicandclinicalprofileofpatientswithbipolarversusunipolardepression
AT punnoosevarghesep comparativestudyonpsychosociodemographicandclinicalprofileofpatientswithbipolarversusunipolardepression
AT varghesepjoseph comparativestudyonpsychosociodemographicandclinicalprofileofpatientswithbipolarversusunipolardepression