Cargando…

Differential Habitat Use or Intraguild Interactions: What Structures a Carnivore Community?

Differential habitat use and intraguild competition are both thought to be important drivers of animal population sizes and distributions. Habitat associations for individual species are well-established, and interactions between particular pairs of species have been highlighted in many focal studie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gompper, Matthew E., Lesmeister, Damon B., Ray, Justina C., Malcolm, Jay R., Kays, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4711579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26731404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146055
_version_ 1782409951717621760
author Gompper, Matthew E.
Lesmeister, Damon B.
Ray, Justina C.
Malcolm, Jay R.
Kays, Roland
author_facet Gompper, Matthew E.
Lesmeister, Damon B.
Ray, Justina C.
Malcolm, Jay R.
Kays, Roland
author_sort Gompper, Matthew E.
collection PubMed
description Differential habitat use and intraguild competition are both thought to be important drivers of animal population sizes and distributions. Habitat associations for individual species are well-established, and interactions between particular pairs of species have been highlighted in many focal studies. However, community-wide assessments of the relative strengths of these two factors have not been conducted. We built multi-scale habitat occupancy models for five carnivore taxa of New York’s Adirondack landscape and assessed the relative performance of these models against ones in which co-occurrences of potentially competing carnivore species were also incorporated. Distribution models based on habitat performed well for all species. Black bear (Ursus americanus) and fisher (Martes pennanti) distribution was similar in that occupancy of both species was negatively associated with paved roads. However, black bears were also associated with larger forest fragments and fishers with smaller forest fragments. No models with habitat features were more supported than the null habitat model for raccoons (Procyon lotor). Martens (Martes americana) were most associated with increased terrain ruggedness and elevation. Weasel (Mustela spp.) occupancy increased with the cover of deciduous forest. For most species dyads habitat-only models were more supported than those models with potential competitors incorporated. The exception to this finding was for the smallest carnivore taxa (marten and weasel) where habitat plus coyote abundance models typically performed better than habitat-only models. Assessing this carnivore community as whole, we conclude that differential habitat use is more important than species interactions in maintaining the distribution and structure of this carnivore guild.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4711579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47115792016-01-26 Differential Habitat Use or Intraguild Interactions: What Structures a Carnivore Community? Gompper, Matthew E. Lesmeister, Damon B. Ray, Justina C. Malcolm, Jay R. Kays, Roland PLoS One Research Article Differential habitat use and intraguild competition are both thought to be important drivers of animal population sizes and distributions. Habitat associations for individual species are well-established, and interactions between particular pairs of species have been highlighted in many focal studies. However, community-wide assessments of the relative strengths of these two factors have not been conducted. We built multi-scale habitat occupancy models for five carnivore taxa of New York’s Adirondack landscape and assessed the relative performance of these models against ones in which co-occurrences of potentially competing carnivore species were also incorporated. Distribution models based on habitat performed well for all species. Black bear (Ursus americanus) and fisher (Martes pennanti) distribution was similar in that occupancy of both species was negatively associated with paved roads. However, black bears were also associated with larger forest fragments and fishers with smaller forest fragments. No models with habitat features were more supported than the null habitat model for raccoons (Procyon lotor). Martens (Martes americana) were most associated with increased terrain ruggedness and elevation. Weasel (Mustela spp.) occupancy increased with the cover of deciduous forest. For most species dyads habitat-only models were more supported than those models with potential competitors incorporated. The exception to this finding was for the smallest carnivore taxa (marten and weasel) where habitat plus coyote abundance models typically performed better than habitat-only models. Assessing this carnivore community as whole, we conclude that differential habitat use is more important than species interactions in maintaining the distribution and structure of this carnivore guild. Public Library of Science 2016-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4711579/ /pubmed/26731404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146055 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gompper, Matthew E.
Lesmeister, Damon B.
Ray, Justina C.
Malcolm, Jay R.
Kays, Roland
Differential Habitat Use or Intraguild Interactions: What Structures a Carnivore Community?
title Differential Habitat Use or Intraguild Interactions: What Structures a Carnivore Community?
title_full Differential Habitat Use or Intraguild Interactions: What Structures a Carnivore Community?
title_fullStr Differential Habitat Use or Intraguild Interactions: What Structures a Carnivore Community?
title_full_unstemmed Differential Habitat Use or Intraguild Interactions: What Structures a Carnivore Community?
title_short Differential Habitat Use or Intraguild Interactions: What Structures a Carnivore Community?
title_sort differential habitat use or intraguild interactions: what structures a carnivore community?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4711579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26731404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146055
work_keys_str_mv AT gomppermatthewe differentialhabitatuseorintraguildinteractionswhatstructuresacarnivorecommunity
AT lesmeisterdamonb differentialhabitatuseorintraguildinteractionswhatstructuresacarnivorecommunity
AT rayjustinac differentialhabitatuseorintraguildinteractionswhatstructuresacarnivorecommunity
AT malcolmjayr differentialhabitatuseorintraguildinteractionswhatstructuresacarnivorecommunity
AT kaysroland differentialhabitatuseorintraguildinteractionswhatstructuresacarnivorecommunity