Cargando…

Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study

BACKGROUND: An important constituent of an orthodontic appliance is orthodontic brackets. It is either the bracket or the archwire that slides through the bracket slot, during sliding mechanics. Overcoming the friction between the two surfaces demands an important consideration in an appliance desig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Chetankumar O., Vakil, Ketan K., Mahamuni, Avinash, Tekale, Pawankumar Dnyandeo, Gayake, Prasad V., Vakil, Jeegar K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26763529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0116-2
_version_ 1782410015563317248
author Agarwal, Chetankumar O.
Vakil, Ketan K.
Mahamuni, Avinash
Tekale, Pawankumar Dnyandeo
Gayake, Prasad V.
Vakil, Jeegar K.
author_facet Agarwal, Chetankumar O.
Vakil, Ketan K.
Mahamuni, Avinash
Tekale, Pawankumar Dnyandeo
Gayake, Prasad V.
Vakil, Jeegar K.
author_sort Agarwal, Chetankumar O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An important constituent of an orthodontic appliance is orthodontic brackets. It is either the bracket or the archwire that slides through the bracket slot, during sliding mechanics. Overcoming the friction between the two surfaces demands an important consideration in an appliance design. The present study investigated the surface roughness of four different commercially available stainless steel brackets. METHODS: All tests were carried out to analyse quantitatively the morphological surface of the bracket slot floor with the help of scanning electron microscope (SEM) machine and to qualitatively analyse the average surface roughness (Sa) of the bracket slot floor with the help of a three-dimensional (3D) non-contact optical surface profilometer machine. RESULTS: The SEM microphotographs were evaluated with the help of visual analogue scale, the surface roughness for group A = 0—very rough surface, group C = 1—rough surface, group B = 2—smooth surface, and group D = 3—very smooth surface. Surface roughness evaluation with the 3D non-contact optical surface profilometer machine was highest for group A, followed by group C, group B and group D. Groups B and D provided smooth surface roughness; however, group D had the very smooth surface with values 0.74 and 0.75 for mesial and distal slots, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor with both SEM and profilometer machine led to the conclusion that the average surface roughness was highest for group A, followed by group C, group B and group D.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4712177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47121772016-01-19 Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study Agarwal, Chetankumar O. Vakil, Ketan K. Mahamuni, Avinash Tekale, Pawankumar Dnyandeo Gayake, Prasad V. Vakil, Jeegar K. Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: An important constituent of an orthodontic appliance is orthodontic brackets. It is either the bracket or the archwire that slides through the bracket slot, during sliding mechanics. Overcoming the friction between the two surfaces demands an important consideration in an appliance design. The present study investigated the surface roughness of four different commercially available stainless steel brackets. METHODS: All tests were carried out to analyse quantitatively the morphological surface of the bracket slot floor with the help of scanning electron microscope (SEM) machine and to qualitatively analyse the average surface roughness (Sa) of the bracket slot floor with the help of a three-dimensional (3D) non-contact optical surface profilometer machine. RESULTS: The SEM microphotographs were evaluated with the help of visual analogue scale, the surface roughness for group A = 0—very rough surface, group C = 1—rough surface, group B = 2—smooth surface, and group D = 3—very smooth surface. Surface roughness evaluation with the 3D non-contact optical surface profilometer machine was highest for group A, followed by group C, group B and group D. Groups B and D provided smooth surface roughness; however, group D had the very smooth surface with values 0.74 and 0.75 for mesial and distal slots, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor with both SEM and profilometer machine led to the conclusion that the average surface roughness was highest for group A, followed by group C, group B and group D. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4712177/ /pubmed/26763529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0116-2 Text en © Agarwal et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Agarwal, Chetankumar O.
Vakil, Ketan K.
Mahamuni, Avinash
Tekale, Pawankumar Dnyandeo
Gayake, Prasad V.
Vakil, Jeegar K.
Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study
title Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study
title_full Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study
title_fullStr Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study
title_short Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study
title_sort evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3d perspective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26763529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0116-2
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalchetankumaro evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy
AT vakilketank evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy
AT mahamuniavinash evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy
AT tekalepawankumardnyandeo evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy
AT gayakeprasadv evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy
AT vakiljeegark evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy