Cargando…
Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study
BACKGROUND: An important constituent of an orthodontic appliance is orthodontic brackets. It is either the bracket or the archwire that slides through the bracket slot, during sliding mechanics. Overcoming the friction between the two surfaces demands an important consideration in an appliance desig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26763529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0116-2 |
_version_ | 1782410015563317248 |
---|---|
author | Agarwal, Chetankumar O. Vakil, Ketan K. Mahamuni, Avinash Tekale, Pawankumar Dnyandeo Gayake, Prasad V. Vakil, Jeegar K. |
author_facet | Agarwal, Chetankumar O. Vakil, Ketan K. Mahamuni, Avinash Tekale, Pawankumar Dnyandeo Gayake, Prasad V. Vakil, Jeegar K. |
author_sort | Agarwal, Chetankumar O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An important constituent of an orthodontic appliance is orthodontic brackets. It is either the bracket or the archwire that slides through the bracket slot, during sliding mechanics. Overcoming the friction between the two surfaces demands an important consideration in an appliance design. The present study investigated the surface roughness of four different commercially available stainless steel brackets. METHODS: All tests were carried out to analyse quantitatively the morphological surface of the bracket slot floor with the help of scanning electron microscope (SEM) machine and to qualitatively analyse the average surface roughness (Sa) of the bracket slot floor with the help of a three-dimensional (3D) non-contact optical surface profilometer machine. RESULTS: The SEM microphotographs were evaluated with the help of visual analogue scale, the surface roughness for group A = 0—very rough surface, group C = 1—rough surface, group B = 2—smooth surface, and group D = 3—very smooth surface. Surface roughness evaluation with the 3D non-contact optical surface profilometer machine was highest for group A, followed by group C, group B and group D. Groups B and D provided smooth surface roughness; however, group D had the very smooth surface with values 0.74 and 0.75 for mesial and distal slots, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor with both SEM and profilometer machine led to the conclusion that the average surface roughness was highest for group A, followed by group C, group B and group D. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4712177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47121772016-01-19 Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study Agarwal, Chetankumar O. Vakil, Ketan K. Mahamuni, Avinash Tekale, Pawankumar Dnyandeo Gayake, Prasad V. Vakil, Jeegar K. Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: An important constituent of an orthodontic appliance is orthodontic brackets. It is either the bracket or the archwire that slides through the bracket slot, during sliding mechanics. Overcoming the friction between the two surfaces demands an important consideration in an appliance design. The present study investigated the surface roughness of four different commercially available stainless steel brackets. METHODS: All tests were carried out to analyse quantitatively the morphological surface of the bracket slot floor with the help of scanning electron microscope (SEM) machine and to qualitatively analyse the average surface roughness (Sa) of the bracket slot floor with the help of a three-dimensional (3D) non-contact optical surface profilometer machine. RESULTS: The SEM microphotographs were evaluated with the help of visual analogue scale, the surface roughness for group A = 0—very rough surface, group C = 1—rough surface, group B = 2—smooth surface, and group D = 3—very smooth surface. Surface roughness evaluation with the 3D non-contact optical surface profilometer machine was highest for group A, followed by group C, group B and group D. Groups B and D provided smooth surface roughness; however, group D had the very smooth surface with values 0.74 and 0.75 for mesial and distal slots, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor with both SEM and profilometer machine led to the conclusion that the average surface roughness was highest for group A, followed by group C, group B and group D. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4712177/ /pubmed/26763529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0116-2 Text en © Agarwal et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Agarwal, Chetankumar O. Vakil, Ketan K. Mahamuni, Avinash Tekale, Pawankumar Dnyandeo Gayake, Prasad V. Vakil, Jeegar K. Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study |
title | Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study |
title_full | Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study |
title_short | Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3D perspective study |
title_sort | evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor—a 3d perspective study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26763529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0116-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agarwalchetankumaro evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy AT vakilketank evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy AT mahamuniavinash evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy AT tekalepawankumardnyandeo evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy AT gayakeprasadv evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy AT vakiljeegark evaluationofsurfaceroughnessofthebracketslotfloora3dperspectivestudy |