Cargando…

Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services

There is high-level political support for the use of green infrastructure (GI) across Europe, to maintain viable populations and to provide ecosystem services (ES). Even though GI is inherently a spatial concept, the modern tools for spatial planning have not been recognized, such as in the recent E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snäll, Tord, Lehtomäki, Joona, Arponen, Anni, Elith, Jane, Moilanen, Atte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26395184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0613-y
_version_ 1782410028898058240
author Snäll, Tord
Lehtomäki, Joona
Arponen, Anni
Elith, Jane
Moilanen, Atte
author_facet Snäll, Tord
Lehtomäki, Joona
Arponen, Anni
Elith, Jane
Moilanen, Atte
author_sort Snäll, Tord
collection PubMed
description There is high-level political support for the use of green infrastructure (GI) across Europe, to maintain viable populations and to provide ecosystem services (ES). Even though GI is inherently a spatial concept, the modern tools for spatial planning have not been recognized, such as in the recent European Environment Agency (EEA) report. We outline a toolbox of methods useful for GI design that explicitly accounts for biodiversity and ES. Data on species occurrence, habitats, and environmental variables are increasingly available via open-access internet platforms. Such data can be synthesized by statistical species distribution modeling, producing maps of biodiversity features. These, together with maps of ES, can form the basis for GI design. We argue that spatial conservation prioritization (SCP) methods are effective tools for GI design, as the overall SCP goal is cost-effective allocation of conservation efforts. Corridors are currently promoted by the EEA as the means for implementing GI design, but they typically target the needs of only a subset of the regional species pool. SCP methods would help to ensure that GI provides a balanced solution for the requirements of many biodiversity features (e.g., species, habitat types) and ES simultaneously in a cost-effective manner. Such tools are necessary to make GI into an operational concept for combating biodiversity loss and promoting ES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4712240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47122402016-01-19 Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services Snäll, Tord Lehtomäki, Joona Arponen, Anni Elith, Jane Moilanen, Atte Environ Manage Article There is high-level political support for the use of green infrastructure (GI) across Europe, to maintain viable populations and to provide ecosystem services (ES). Even though GI is inherently a spatial concept, the modern tools for spatial planning have not been recognized, such as in the recent European Environment Agency (EEA) report. We outline a toolbox of methods useful for GI design that explicitly accounts for biodiversity and ES. Data on species occurrence, habitats, and environmental variables are increasingly available via open-access internet platforms. Such data can be synthesized by statistical species distribution modeling, producing maps of biodiversity features. These, together with maps of ES, can form the basis for GI design. We argue that spatial conservation prioritization (SCP) methods are effective tools for GI design, as the overall SCP goal is cost-effective allocation of conservation efforts. Corridors are currently promoted by the EEA as the means for implementing GI design, but they typically target the needs of only a subset of the regional species pool. SCP methods would help to ensure that GI provides a balanced solution for the requirements of many biodiversity features (e.g., species, habitat types) and ES simultaneously in a cost-effective manner. Such tools are necessary to make GI into an operational concept for combating biodiversity loss and promoting ES. Springer US 2015-09-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4712240/ /pubmed/26395184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0613-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Snäll, Tord
Lehtomäki, Joona
Arponen, Anni
Elith, Jane
Moilanen, Atte
Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services
title Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services
title_full Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services
title_fullStr Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services
title_full_unstemmed Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services
title_short Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services
title_sort green infrastructure design based on spatial conservation prioritization and modeling of biodiversity features and ecosystem services
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26395184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0613-y
work_keys_str_mv AT snalltord greeninfrastructuredesignbasedonspatialconservationprioritizationandmodelingofbiodiversityfeaturesandecosystemservices
AT lehtomakijoona greeninfrastructuredesignbasedonspatialconservationprioritizationandmodelingofbiodiversityfeaturesandecosystemservices
AT arponenanni greeninfrastructuredesignbasedonspatialconservationprioritizationandmodelingofbiodiversityfeaturesandecosystemservices
AT elithjane greeninfrastructuredesignbasedonspatialconservationprioritizationandmodelingofbiodiversityfeaturesandecosystemservices
AT moilanenatte greeninfrastructuredesignbasedonspatialconservationprioritizationandmodelingofbiodiversityfeaturesandecosystemservices