Cargando…

Who Benefits from Ecosystem Services? A Case Study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

There is increasing experience with the valuation of ecosystem services. However, to date, less attention has been devoted to who is actually benefiting from ecosystem services. This nevertheless is a key issue, in particular, if ecosystem services analysis and valuation is used to support environme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suwarno, Aritta, Hein, Lars, Sumarga, Elham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26467675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0623-9
_version_ 1782410029123502080
author Suwarno, Aritta
Hein, Lars
Sumarga, Elham
author_facet Suwarno, Aritta
Hein, Lars
Sumarga, Elham
author_sort Suwarno, Aritta
collection PubMed
description There is increasing experience with the valuation of ecosystem services. However, to date, less attention has been devoted to who is actually benefiting from ecosystem services. This nevertheless is a key issue, in particular, if ecosystem services analysis and valuation is used to support environmental management. This study assesses and analyzes how the monetary benefits of seven ecosystem services are generated in Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia, are distributed to different types of beneficiaries. We analyze the following ecosystem services: (1) timber production; (2) rattan collection; (3) jelutong resin collection; (4) rubber production (based on permanent agroforestry systems); (5) oil palm production on three management scales (company, plasma farmer, and independent smallholder); (6) paddy production; and (7) carbon sequestration. Our study shows that the benefits generated from these services differ markedly between the stakeholders, which we grouped into private, public, and household entities. The distribution of these benefits is strongly influenced by government policies and in particular benefit sharing mechanisms. Hence, land-use change and policies influencing land-use change can be expected to have different impacts on different stakeholders. Our study also shows that the benefits generated by oil palm conversion, a main driver for land-use change in the province, are almost exclusively accrued by companies and at this point in time are shared unequally with local stakeholders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4712241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47122412016-01-19 Who Benefits from Ecosystem Services? A Case Study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia Suwarno, Aritta Hein, Lars Sumarga, Elham Environ Manage Article There is increasing experience with the valuation of ecosystem services. However, to date, less attention has been devoted to who is actually benefiting from ecosystem services. This nevertheless is a key issue, in particular, if ecosystem services analysis and valuation is used to support environmental management. This study assesses and analyzes how the monetary benefits of seven ecosystem services are generated in Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia, are distributed to different types of beneficiaries. We analyze the following ecosystem services: (1) timber production; (2) rattan collection; (3) jelutong resin collection; (4) rubber production (based on permanent agroforestry systems); (5) oil palm production on three management scales (company, plasma farmer, and independent smallholder); (6) paddy production; and (7) carbon sequestration. Our study shows that the benefits generated from these services differ markedly between the stakeholders, which we grouped into private, public, and household entities. The distribution of these benefits is strongly influenced by government policies and in particular benefit sharing mechanisms. Hence, land-use change and policies influencing land-use change can be expected to have different impacts on different stakeholders. Our study also shows that the benefits generated by oil palm conversion, a main driver for land-use change in the province, are almost exclusively accrued by companies and at this point in time are shared unequally with local stakeholders. Springer US 2015-10-14 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4712241/ /pubmed/26467675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0623-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Suwarno, Aritta
Hein, Lars
Sumarga, Elham
Who Benefits from Ecosystem Services? A Case Study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
title Who Benefits from Ecosystem Services? A Case Study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
title_full Who Benefits from Ecosystem Services? A Case Study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
title_fullStr Who Benefits from Ecosystem Services? A Case Study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Who Benefits from Ecosystem Services? A Case Study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
title_short Who Benefits from Ecosystem Services? A Case Study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
title_sort who benefits from ecosystem services? a case study for central kalimantan, indonesia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26467675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0623-9
work_keys_str_mv AT suwarnoaritta whobenefitsfromecosystemservicesacasestudyforcentralkalimantanindonesia
AT heinlars whobenefitsfromecosystemservicesacasestudyforcentralkalimantanindonesia
AT sumargaelham whobenefitsfromecosystemservicesacasestudyforcentralkalimantanindonesia