Cargando…
Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study
PURPOSE: To verify the accuracy of volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) using the RapidArc™ device when switching patients from one single linear accelerator (linac) to a paired energy and mechanics "twin" linac without reoptimization of the original treatment plan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four cen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26762179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0577-3 |
_version_ | 1782410066634211328 |
---|---|
author | Fenoglietto, P. Khodri, M. Nguyen, D. Josserand-Pietri, F. Aillères, N. |
author_facet | Fenoglietto, P. Khodri, M. Nguyen, D. Josserand-Pietri, F. Aillères, N. |
author_sort | Fenoglietto, P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To verify the accuracy of volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) using the RapidArc™ device when switching patients from one single linear accelerator (linac) to a paired energy and mechanics "twin" linac without reoptimization of the original treatment plan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four centers using 8 linacs were involved in this study. Seventy-four patients previously treated with the 6MV photon RapidArc™ technique were selected for analysis, using 242 measurements. In each institution, all patients were planned on linac A, and their plans were verified both on linac A and on the twin linac B. Verifications were done using the amorphous silicium electronic portal imager (EPID) of the linacs and were analyzed with the EpiQa software (Epidos, Bratislavia, Slovakia). The gamma index formalism was used for validation with a double threshold of 3 % and 3 mm with a measurement resolution of 0.39 mm/pixel, and a smoothed resolution of approximately 2.5 mm. RESULTS: The number of points passing the gamma criteria between the measured and computed doses was 94.79 ± 2.57 % for linac A and 94.61 ± 2.46 % for linac B. Concerning the smoothed measurement analysis, 98.67 ± 1.26 % and 98.59 ± 1.20 % points passing the threshold were obtained for linacs A and B, respectively. The difference between the 2 dose matrices acquired on the EPID was very small, with 99.92 ± 0.06 % of the points passing the criteria. CONCLUSION: For linacs sharing the same mechanical and energy parameters, this study tends to indicate that patients may be safely switched from treatment with one linac to treatment with its twin linac using the same VMAT plan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4712460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47124602016-01-15 Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study Fenoglietto, P. Khodri, M. Nguyen, D. Josserand-Pietri, F. Aillères, N. Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To verify the accuracy of volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) using the RapidArc™ device when switching patients from one single linear accelerator (linac) to a paired energy and mechanics "twin" linac without reoptimization of the original treatment plan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four centers using 8 linacs were involved in this study. Seventy-four patients previously treated with the 6MV photon RapidArc™ technique were selected for analysis, using 242 measurements. In each institution, all patients were planned on linac A, and their plans were verified both on linac A and on the twin linac B. Verifications were done using the amorphous silicium electronic portal imager (EPID) of the linacs and were analyzed with the EpiQa software (Epidos, Bratislavia, Slovakia). The gamma index formalism was used for validation with a double threshold of 3 % and 3 mm with a measurement resolution of 0.39 mm/pixel, and a smoothed resolution of approximately 2.5 mm. RESULTS: The number of points passing the gamma criteria between the measured and computed doses was 94.79 ± 2.57 % for linac A and 94.61 ± 2.46 % for linac B. Concerning the smoothed measurement analysis, 98.67 ± 1.26 % and 98.59 ± 1.20 % points passing the threshold were obtained for linacs A and B, respectively. The difference between the 2 dose matrices acquired on the EPID was very small, with 99.92 ± 0.06 % of the points passing the criteria. CONCLUSION: For linacs sharing the same mechanical and energy parameters, this study tends to indicate that patients may be safely switched from treatment with one linac to treatment with its twin linac using the same VMAT plan. BioMed Central 2016-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4712460/ /pubmed/26762179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0577-3 Text en © Fenoglietto et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Fenoglietto, P. Khodri, M. Nguyen, D. Josserand-Pietri, F. Aillères, N. Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study |
title | Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study |
title_full | Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study |
title_short | Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study |
title_sort | twin machines validation for vmat treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26762179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0577-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fenogliettop twinmachinesvalidationforvmattreatmentsusingelectronicportalimagingdeviceamulticenterstudy AT khodrim twinmachinesvalidationforvmattreatmentsusingelectronicportalimagingdeviceamulticenterstudy AT nguyend twinmachinesvalidationforvmattreatmentsusingelectronicportalimagingdeviceamulticenterstudy AT josserandpietrif twinmachinesvalidationforvmattreatmentsusingelectronicportalimagingdeviceamulticenterstudy AT ailleresn twinmachinesvalidationforvmattreatmentsusingelectronicportalimagingdeviceamulticenterstudy |