Cargando…

Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study

PURPOSE: To verify the accuracy of volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) using the RapidArc™ device when switching patients from one single linear accelerator (linac) to a paired energy and mechanics "twin" linac without reoptimization of the original treatment plan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four cen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fenoglietto, P., Khodri, M., Nguyen, D., Josserand-Pietri, F., Aillères, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26762179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0577-3
_version_ 1782410066634211328
author Fenoglietto, P.
Khodri, M.
Nguyen, D.
Josserand-Pietri, F.
Aillères, N.
author_facet Fenoglietto, P.
Khodri, M.
Nguyen, D.
Josserand-Pietri, F.
Aillères, N.
author_sort Fenoglietto, P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To verify the accuracy of volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) using the RapidArc™ device when switching patients from one single linear accelerator (linac) to a paired energy and mechanics "twin" linac without reoptimization of the original treatment plan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four centers using 8 linacs were involved in this study. Seventy-four patients previously treated with the 6MV photon RapidArc™ technique were selected for analysis, using 242 measurements. In each institution, all patients were planned on linac A, and their plans were verified both on linac A and on the twin linac B. Verifications were done using the amorphous silicium electronic portal imager (EPID) of the linacs and were analyzed with the EpiQa software (Epidos, Bratislavia, Slovakia). The gamma index formalism was used for validation with a double threshold of 3 % and 3 mm with a measurement resolution of 0.39 mm/pixel, and a smoothed resolution of approximately 2.5 mm. RESULTS: The number of points passing the gamma criteria between the measured and computed doses was 94.79 ± 2.57 % for linac A and 94.61 ± 2.46 % for linac B. Concerning the smoothed measurement analysis, 98.67 ± 1.26 % and 98.59 ± 1.20 % points passing the threshold were obtained for linacs A and B, respectively. The difference between the 2 dose matrices acquired on the EPID was very small, with 99.92 ± 0.06 % of the points passing the criteria. CONCLUSION: For linacs sharing the same mechanical and energy parameters, this study tends to indicate that patients may be safely switched from treatment with one linac to treatment with its twin linac using the same VMAT plan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4712460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47124602016-01-15 Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study Fenoglietto, P. Khodri, M. Nguyen, D. Josserand-Pietri, F. Aillères, N. Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To verify the accuracy of volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) using the RapidArc™ device when switching patients from one single linear accelerator (linac) to a paired energy and mechanics "twin" linac without reoptimization of the original treatment plan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four centers using 8 linacs were involved in this study. Seventy-four patients previously treated with the 6MV photon RapidArc™ technique were selected for analysis, using 242 measurements. In each institution, all patients were planned on linac A, and their plans were verified both on linac A and on the twin linac B. Verifications were done using the amorphous silicium electronic portal imager (EPID) of the linacs and were analyzed with the EpiQa software (Epidos, Bratislavia, Slovakia). The gamma index formalism was used for validation with a double threshold of 3 % and 3 mm with a measurement resolution of 0.39 mm/pixel, and a smoothed resolution of approximately 2.5 mm. RESULTS: The number of points passing the gamma criteria between the measured and computed doses was 94.79 ± 2.57 % for linac A and 94.61 ± 2.46 % for linac B. Concerning the smoothed measurement analysis, 98.67 ± 1.26 % and 98.59 ± 1.20 % points passing the threshold were obtained for linacs A and B, respectively. The difference between the 2 dose matrices acquired on the EPID was very small, with 99.92 ± 0.06 % of the points passing the criteria. CONCLUSION: For linacs sharing the same mechanical and energy parameters, this study tends to indicate that patients may be safely switched from treatment with one linac to treatment with its twin linac using the same VMAT plan. BioMed Central 2016-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4712460/ /pubmed/26762179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0577-3 Text en © Fenoglietto et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Fenoglietto, P.
Khodri, M.
Nguyen, D.
Josserand-Pietri, F.
Aillères, N.
Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study
title Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study
title_full Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study
title_fullStr Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study
title_short Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study
title_sort twin machines validation for vmat treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26762179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0577-3
work_keys_str_mv AT fenogliettop twinmachinesvalidationforvmattreatmentsusingelectronicportalimagingdeviceamulticenterstudy
AT khodrim twinmachinesvalidationforvmattreatmentsusingelectronicportalimagingdeviceamulticenterstudy
AT nguyend twinmachinesvalidationforvmattreatmentsusingelectronicportalimagingdeviceamulticenterstudy
AT josserandpietrif twinmachinesvalidationforvmattreatmentsusingelectronicportalimagingdeviceamulticenterstudy
AT ailleresn twinmachinesvalidationforvmattreatmentsusingelectronicportalimagingdeviceamulticenterstudy