Cargando…

Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND. Many studies have explored associations between depression and facial emotion recognition (ER). However, these studies have used various paradigms and multiple stimulus sets, rendering comparisons difficult. Few studies have attempted to determine the magnitude of any effect and whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalili, M. N., Penton-Voak, I. S., Harmer, C. J., Munafò, M. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714002591
_version_ 1782410070280110080
author Dalili, M. N.
Penton-Voak, I. S.
Harmer, C. J.
Munafò, M. R.
author_facet Dalili, M. N.
Penton-Voak, I. S.
Harmer, C. J.
Munafò, M. R.
author_sort Dalili, M. N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Many studies have explored associations between depression and facial emotion recognition (ER). However, these studies have used various paradigms and multiple stimulus sets, rendering comparisons difficult. Few studies have attempted to determine the magnitude of any effect and whether studies are properly powered to detect it. We conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize the findings across studies on ER in depressed individuals compared to controls. METHOD. Studies of ER that included depressed and control samples and published before June 2013 were identified in PubMed and Web of Science. Studies using schematic faces, neuroimaging studies and drug treatment studies were excluded. RESULTS. Meta-analysis of k = 22 independent samples indicated impaired recognition of emotion [k = 22, g = −0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.25 to −0.07, p < 0.001]. Critically, this was observed for anger, disgust, fear, happiness and surprise (k's = 7–22, g's = −0.42 to −0.17, p's < 0.08), but not sadness (k = 21, g = −0.09, 95% CI −0.23 to +0.06, p = 0.23). Study-level characteristics did not appear to be associated with the observed effect. Power analysis indicated that a sample of approximately 615 cases and 615 controls would be required to detect this association with 80% power at an alpha level of 0.05. CONCLUSIONS. These findings suggest that the ER impairment reported in the depression literature exists across all basic emotions except sadness. The effect size, however, is small, and previous studies have been underpowered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4712476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47124762016-01-20 Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder Dalili, M. N. Penton-Voak, I. S. Harmer, C. J. Munafò, M. R. Psychol Med Review Articles BACKGROUND. Many studies have explored associations between depression and facial emotion recognition (ER). However, these studies have used various paradigms and multiple stimulus sets, rendering comparisons difficult. Few studies have attempted to determine the magnitude of any effect and whether studies are properly powered to detect it. We conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize the findings across studies on ER in depressed individuals compared to controls. METHOD. Studies of ER that included depressed and control samples and published before June 2013 were identified in PubMed and Web of Science. Studies using schematic faces, neuroimaging studies and drug treatment studies were excluded. RESULTS. Meta-analysis of k = 22 independent samples indicated impaired recognition of emotion [k = 22, g = −0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.25 to −0.07, p < 0.001]. Critically, this was observed for anger, disgust, fear, happiness and surprise (k's = 7–22, g's = −0.42 to −0.17, p's < 0.08), but not sadness (k = 21, g = −0.09, 95% CI −0.23 to +0.06, p = 0.23). Study-level characteristics did not appear to be associated with the observed effect. Power analysis indicated that a sample of approximately 615 cases and 615 controls would be required to detect this association with 80% power at an alpha level of 0.05. CONCLUSIONS. These findings suggest that the ER impairment reported in the depression literature exists across all basic emotions except sadness. The effect size, however, is small, and previous studies have been underpowered. Cambridge University Press 2015-04 2014-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4712476/ /pubmed/25395075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714002591 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Dalili, M. N.
Penton-Voak, I. S.
Harmer, C. J.
Munafò, M. R.
Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder
title Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder
title_full Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder
title_short Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder
title_sort meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714002591
work_keys_str_mv AT dalilimn metaanalysisofemotionrecognitiondeficitsinmajordepressivedisorder
AT pentonvoakis metaanalysisofemotionrecognitiondeficitsinmajordepressivedisorder
AT harmercj metaanalysisofemotionrecognitiondeficitsinmajordepressivedisorder
AT munafomr metaanalysisofemotionrecognitiondeficitsinmajordepressivedisorder