Cargando…

Panobinostat PK/PD profile in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

PURPOSE: Panobinostat, a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma when combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone in a phase 3 trial, PANORAMA-1. This study aims to explore exposure–response relationship for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mu, Song, Kuroda, Yoshiaki, Shibayama, Hirohiko, Hino, Masayuki, Tajima, Takeshi, Corrado, Claudia, Lin, Rong, Waldron, Edward, Binlich, Florence, Suzuki, Kenshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4713719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26494130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1967-z
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Panobinostat, a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma when combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone in a phase 3 trial, PANORAMA-1. This study aims to explore exposure–response relationship for panobinostat in this combination in a phase 1 trial, B2207 and contrast with data from historical single-agent studies. METHODS: Panobinostat plasma concentration–time profiles were obtained in patients from PANORAMA-1 (n = 12) and B2207 (n = 12) trials. Overall response rates (ORR) and major adverse events (AE) by panobinostat exposure were investigated in the B2207 trial. Panobinostat PK data from combination trials were contrasted with data from single-agent studies. RESULTS: At maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the geometric mean of panobinostat area under curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) was 47.5 ng h/mL (77 % CV), and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 8.1 ng/mL (90 % CV). These values were comparable with exposure data obtained in PANORAMA-1, but were 20 % lower than those without dexamethasone, and ∼50 % lower from single-agent trials, likely due to enzyme induction by dexamethasone. Higher levels of panobinostat exposure were associated with higher response rates and higher incidences of diarrhea and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Apparent panobinostat exposure–AE and exposure–ORR relationships were observed when combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. The addition of dexamethasone facilitated best response even though plasma exposure of panobinostat was reduced. Combination with a strong enzyme inducer should be avoided in future trials to prevent further reduction of panobinostat exposure.