Cargando…

Maximum inspiratory pressure and rapid shallow breathing index as predictors of successful ventilator weaning

[Purpose] To investigate the predictive value of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) in a ventilator weaning protocol and to evaluate the differences between clinical and surgical patients in the intensive care unit. [Subjects and Methods] Patients aged ≥1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bien, Umilson dos Santos, Souza, Gerson Fonseca, Campos, Elisangela Siqueira, Farah de Carvalho, Etiene, Fernandes, Matheus Guedes, Santoro, Ilka, Costa, Dirceu, Arena, Ross, Sampaio, Luciana Maria Malosá
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4713778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3723
_version_ 1782410196049461248
author Bien, Umilson dos Santos
Souza, Gerson Fonseca
Campos, Elisangela Siqueira
Farah de Carvalho, Etiene
Fernandes, Matheus Guedes
Santoro, Ilka
Costa, Dirceu
Arena, Ross
Sampaio, Luciana Maria Malosá
author_facet Bien, Umilson dos Santos
Souza, Gerson Fonseca
Campos, Elisangela Siqueira
Farah de Carvalho, Etiene
Fernandes, Matheus Guedes
Santoro, Ilka
Costa, Dirceu
Arena, Ross
Sampaio, Luciana Maria Malosá
author_sort Bien, Umilson dos Santos
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] To investigate the predictive value of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) in a ventilator weaning protocol and to evaluate the differences between clinical and surgical patients in the intensive care unit. [Subjects and Methods] Patients aged ≥15 years who underwent orotracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation and who met the criteria of the weaning protocol were included in the study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for the analysis of each index. [Results] Logistic regression analysis was also performed. MIP showed greater sensitivity and specificity [area under the curve (AUC): 0.95 vs. 0.89] and likelihood ratios (LR) (positive(+): 20.85 vs. 9.45; negative(−): 0.07 vs. 0.17) than RSBI in the overall sample (OS) as well as in clinical patients (CP) (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.90; LR+: 24.66 vs. 7.22; LR-: 0.01 vs. 0.15) and surgical patients (SP) (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.87; LR+: 9.33 vs. 5.86; LR−: 0.07 vs. 0.14). The logistic regression analysis revealed that both parameters were significantly associated with the weaning success. The MIP showed greater accuracy than the RSBI (OS: 0.93 vs. 0.85; CP: 0.98 vs. 0.87; SP: 0.93 vs. 0.87). [Conclusion] Both parameters are good predictors of successful ventilator weaning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4713778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47137782016-01-29 Maximum inspiratory pressure and rapid shallow breathing index as predictors of successful ventilator weaning Bien, Umilson dos Santos Souza, Gerson Fonseca Campos, Elisangela Siqueira Farah de Carvalho, Etiene Fernandes, Matheus Guedes Santoro, Ilka Costa, Dirceu Arena, Ross Sampaio, Luciana Maria Malosá J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] To investigate the predictive value of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) in a ventilator weaning protocol and to evaluate the differences between clinical and surgical patients in the intensive care unit. [Subjects and Methods] Patients aged ≥15 years who underwent orotracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation and who met the criteria of the weaning protocol were included in the study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for the analysis of each index. [Results] Logistic regression analysis was also performed. MIP showed greater sensitivity and specificity [area under the curve (AUC): 0.95 vs. 0.89] and likelihood ratios (LR) (positive(+): 20.85 vs. 9.45; negative(−): 0.07 vs. 0.17) than RSBI in the overall sample (OS) as well as in clinical patients (CP) (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.90; LR+: 24.66 vs. 7.22; LR-: 0.01 vs. 0.15) and surgical patients (SP) (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.87; LR+: 9.33 vs. 5.86; LR−: 0.07 vs. 0.14). The logistic regression analysis revealed that both parameters were significantly associated with the weaning success. The MIP showed greater accuracy than the RSBI (OS: 0.93 vs. 0.85; CP: 0.98 vs. 0.87; SP: 0.93 vs. 0.87). [Conclusion] Both parameters are good predictors of successful ventilator weaning. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-12-28 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4713778/ /pubmed/26834339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3723 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bien, Umilson dos Santos
Souza, Gerson Fonseca
Campos, Elisangela Siqueira
Farah de Carvalho, Etiene
Fernandes, Matheus Guedes
Santoro, Ilka
Costa, Dirceu
Arena, Ross
Sampaio, Luciana Maria Malosá
Maximum inspiratory pressure and rapid shallow breathing index as predictors of successful ventilator weaning
title Maximum inspiratory pressure and rapid shallow breathing index as predictors of successful ventilator weaning
title_full Maximum inspiratory pressure and rapid shallow breathing index as predictors of successful ventilator weaning
title_fullStr Maximum inspiratory pressure and rapid shallow breathing index as predictors of successful ventilator weaning
title_full_unstemmed Maximum inspiratory pressure and rapid shallow breathing index as predictors of successful ventilator weaning
title_short Maximum inspiratory pressure and rapid shallow breathing index as predictors of successful ventilator weaning
title_sort maximum inspiratory pressure and rapid shallow breathing index as predictors of successful ventilator weaning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4713778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3723
work_keys_str_mv AT bienumilsondossantos maximuminspiratorypressureandrapidshallowbreathingindexaspredictorsofsuccessfulventilatorweaning
AT souzagersonfonseca maximuminspiratorypressureandrapidshallowbreathingindexaspredictorsofsuccessfulventilatorweaning
AT camposelisangelasiqueira maximuminspiratorypressureandrapidshallowbreathingindexaspredictorsofsuccessfulventilatorweaning
AT farahdecarvalhoetiene maximuminspiratorypressureandrapidshallowbreathingindexaspredictorsofsuccessfulventilatorweaning
AT fernandesmatheusguedes maximuminspiratorypressureandrapidshallowbreathingindexaspredictorsofsuccessfulventilatorweaning
AT santoroilka maximuminspiratorypressureandrapidshallowbreathingindexaspredictorsofsuccessfulventilatorweaning
AT costadirceu maximuminspiratorypressureandrapidshallowbreathingindexaspredictorsofsuccessfulventilatorweaning
AT arenaross maximuminspiratorypressureandrapidshallowbreathingindexaspredictorsofsuccessfulventilatorweaning
AT sampaiolucianamariamalosa maximuminspiratorypressureandrapidshallowbreathingindexaspredictorsofsuccessfulventilatorweaning