Cargando…
The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between jerk cost and the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement. [Subjects] Nineteen male volunteers were included (age: 21 ± 1 years). [Methods] The subjects moved...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4713812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3883 |
_version_ | 1782410203653734400 |
---|---|
author | Fujisawa, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Hiroto Murakami, Kenichi Kawakami, Shingo Suzuki, Makoto |
author_facet | Fujisawa, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Hiroto Murakami, Kenichi Kawakami, Shingo Suzuki, Makoto |
author_sort | Fujisawa, Hiroyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between jerk cost and the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement. [Subjects] Nineteen male volunteers were included (age: 21 ± 1 years). [Methods] The subjects moved from a sitting position to a standing position under two different foot placement conditions: (1) 0 degrees of dorsiflexion on the non-dominant side and 20 degrees of dorsiflexion on the dominant side (P1) and (2) 20 degrees of plantarflexion on the non-dominant side and 20 degrees of dorsiflexion on the dominant side (P2). Two standing conditions were used: (1) natural movement and (2) instructed movement, with instructions to increase weight bearing on the non-dominant side. The center of gravity trajectory and its jerk cost were calculated at each axis: front and back (jerk-x), right and left (jerk-y), and vertical (jerk-z). [Results] Jerk-x and jerk-y were significantly larger during instructed movement than natural movement in both P1 and P2. Jerk-z was not significantly different between instructed and natural movement in P1 or P2. [Conclusion] These results indicate that energy cost influences the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4713812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47138122016-01-29 The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion Fujisawa, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Hiroto Murakami, Kenichi Kawakami, Shingo Suzuki, Makoto J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between jerk cost and the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement. [Subjects] Nineteen male volunteers were included (age: 21 ± 1 years). [Methods] The subjects moved from a sitting position to a standing position under two different foot placement conditions: (1) 0 degrees of dorsiflexion on the non-dominant side and 20 degrees of dorsiflexion on the dominant side (P1) and (2) 20 degrees of plantarflexion on the non-dominant side and 20 degrees of dorsiflexion on the dominant side (P2). Two standing conditions were used: (1) natural movement and (2) instructed movement, with instructions to increase weight bearing on the non-dominant side. The center of gravity trajectory and its jerk cost were calculated at each axis: front and back (jerk-x), right and left (jerk-y), and vertical (jerk-z). [Results] Jerk-x and jerk-y were significantly larger during instructed movement than natural movement in both P1 and P2. Jerk-z was not significantly different between instructed and natural movement in P1 or P2. [Conclusion] These results indicate that energy cost influences the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-12-28 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4713812/ /pubmed/26834373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3883 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fujisawa, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Hiroto Murakami, Kenichi Kawakami, Shingo Suzuki, Makoto The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion |
title | The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory
during sit-to-stand motion |
title_full | The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory
during sit-to-stand motion |
title_fullStr | The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory
during sit-to-stand motion |
title_full_unstemmed | The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory
during sit-to-stand motion |
title_short | The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory
during sit-to-stand motion |
title_sort | relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory
during sit-to-stand motion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4713812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3883 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujisawahiroyuki therelationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion AT suzukihiroto therelationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion AT murakamikenichi therelationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion AT kawakamishingo therelationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion AT suzukimakoto therelationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion AT fujisawahiroyuki relationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion AT suzukihiroto relationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion AT murakamikenichi relationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion AT kawakamishingo relationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion AT suzukimakoto relationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion |