Cargando…

The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between jerk cost and the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement. [Subjects] Nineteen male volunteers were included (age: 21 ± 1 years). [Methods] The subjects moved...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujisawa, Hiroyuki, Suzuki, Hiroto, Murakami, Kenichi, Kawakami, Shingo, Suzuki, Makoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4713812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3883
_version_ 1782410203653734400
author Fujisawa, Hiroyuki
Suzuki, Hiroto
Murakami, Kenichi
Kawakami, Shingo
Suzuki, Makoto
author_facet Fujisawa, Hiroyuki
Suzuki, Hiroto
Murakami, Kenichi
Kawakami, Shingo
Suzuki, Makoto
author_sort Fujisawa, Hiroyuki
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between jerk cost and the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement. [Subjects] Nineteen male volunteers were included (age: 21 ± 1 years). [Methods] The subjects moved from a sitting position to a standing position under two different foot placement conditions: (1) 0 degrees of dorsiflexion on the non-dominant side and 20 degrees of dorsiflexion on the dominant side (P1) and (2) 20 degrees of plantarflexion on the non-dominant side and 20 degrees of dorsiflexion on the dominant side (P2). Two standing conditions were used: (1) natural movement and (2) instructed movement, with instructions to increase weight bearing on the non-dominant side. The center of gravity trajectory and its jerk cost were calculated at each axis: front and back (jerk-x), right and left (jerk-y), and vertical (jerk-z). [Results] Jerk-x and jerk-y were significantly larger during instructed movement than natural movement in both P1 and P2. Jerk-z was not significantly different between instructed and natural movement in P1 or P2. [Conclusion] These results indicate that energy cost influences the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4713812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47138122016-01-29 The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion Fujisawa, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Hiroto Murakami, Kenichi Kawakami, Shingo Suzuki, Makoto J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between jerk cost and the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement. [Subjects] Nineteen male volunteers were included (age: 21 ± 1 years). [Methods] The subjects moved from a sitting position to a standing position under two different foot placement conditions: (1) 0 degrees of dorsiflexion on the non-dominant side and 20 degrees of dorsiflexion on the dominant side (P1) and (2) 20 degrees of plantarflexion on the non-dominant side and 20 degrees of dorsiflexion on the dominant side (P2). Two standing conditions were used: (1) natural movement and (2) instructed movement, with instructions to increase weight bearing on the non-dominant side. The center of gravity trajectory and its jerk cost were calculated at each axis: front and back (jerk-x), right and left (jerk-y), and vertical (jerk-z). [Results] Jerk-x and jerk-y were significantly larger during instructed movement than natural movement in both P1 and P2. Jerk-z was not significantly different between instructed and natural movement in P1 or P2. [Conclusion] These results indicate that energy cost influences the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-12-28 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4713812/ /pubmed/26834373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3883 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fujisawa, Hiroyuki
Suzuki, Hiroto
Murakami, Kenichi
Kawakami, Shingo
Suzuki, Makoto
The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion
title The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion
title_full The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion
title_fullStr The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion
title_short The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion
title_sort relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4713812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3883
work_keys_str_mv AT fujisawahiroyuki therelationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion
AT suzukihiroto therelationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion
AT murakamikenichi therelationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion
AT kawakamishingo therelationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion
AT suzukimakoto therelationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion
AT fujisawahiroyuki relationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion
AT suzukihiroto relationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion
AT murakamikenichi relationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion
AT kawakamishingo relationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion
AT suzukimakoto relationshipbetweenenergycostandthecenterofgravitytrajectoryduringsittostandmotion