Cargando…

A phylogenetic assessment of the polyphyletic nature and intraspecific color polymorphism in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Diptera, Tephritidae)

Abstract. The Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Tephritidae) comprises 85 species of fruit flies, including five highly destructive polyphagous fruit pests. Despite significant work on a few key pest species within the complex, little has been published on the majority of non-economic species in the comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leblanc, Luc, San Jose, Michael, Barr, Norman, Rubinoff, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.540.9786
_version_ 1782410256748380160
author Leblanc, Luc
San Jose, Michael
Barr, Norman
Rubinoff, Daniel
author_facet Leblanc, Luc
San Jose, Michael
Barr, Norman
Rubinoff, Daniel
author_sort Leblanc, Luc
collection PubMed
description Abstract. The Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Tephritidae) comprises 85 species of fruit flies, including five highly destructive polyphagous fruit pests. Despite significant work on a few key pest species within the complex, little has been published on the majority of non-economic species in the complex, other than basic descriptions and illustrations of single specimens regarded as typical representatives. To elucidate the species relationships within the Bactrocera dorsalis complex, we used 159 sequences from one mitochondrial (COI) and two nuclear (elongation factor-1α and period) genes to construct a phylogeny containing 20 described species from within the complex, four additional species that may be new to science, and 26 other species from Bactrocera and its sister genus Dacus. The resulting concatenated phylogeny revealed that most of the species placed in the complex appear to be unrelated, emerging across numerous clades. This suggests that they were placed in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex based on the similarity of convergent characters, which does not appear to be diagnostic. Variations in scutum and abdomen color patterns within each of the non-economic species are presented and demonstrate that distantly-related, cryptic species overlap greatly in traditional morphological color patterns used to separate them in keys. Some of these species may not be distinguishable with confidence by means other than DNA data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4714077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47140772016-01-21 A phylogenetic assessment of the polyphyletic nature and intraspecific color polymorphism in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Diptera, Tephritidae) Leblanc, Luc San Jose, Michael Barr, Norman Rubinoff, Daniel Zookeys Research Article Abstract. The Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Tephritidae) comprises 85 species of fruit flies, including five highly destructive polyphagous fruit pests. Despite significant work on a few key pest species within the complex, little has been published on the majority of non-economic species in the complex, other than basic descriptions and illustrations of single specimens regarded as typical representatives. To elucidate the species relationships within the Bactrocera dorsalis complex, we used 159 sequences from one mitochondrial (COI) and two nuclear (elongation factor-1α and period) genes to construct a phylogeny containing 20 described species from within the complex, four additional species that may be new to science, and 26 other species from Bactrocera and its sister genus Dacus. The resulting concatenated phylogeny revealed that most of the species placed in the complex appear to be unrelated, emerging across numerous clades. This suggests that they were placed in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex based on the similarity of convergent characters, which does not appear to be diagnostic. Variations in scutum and abdomen color patterns within each of the non-economic species are presented and demonstrate that distantly-related, cryptic species overlap greatly in traditional morphological color patterns used to separate them in keys. Some of these species may not be distinguishable with confidence by means other than DNA data. Pensoft Publishers 2015-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4714077/ /pubmed/26798267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.540.9786 Text en Luc Leblanc, Michael San Jose, Norman Barr, Daniel Rubinoff http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leblanc, Luc
San Jose, Michael
Barr, Norman
Rubinoff, Daniel
A phylogenetic assessment of the polyphyletic nature and intraspecific color polymorphism in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Diptera, Tephritidae)
title A phylogenetic assessment of the polyphyletic nature and intraspecific color polymorphism in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Diptera, Tephritidae)
title_full A phylogenetic assessment of the polyphyletic nature and intraspecific color polymorphism in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Diptera, Tephritidae)
title_fullStr A phylogenetic assessment of the polyphyletic nature and intraspecific color polymorphism in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Diptera, Tephritidae)
title_full_unstemmed A phylogenetic assessment of the polyphyletic nature and intraspecific color polymorphism in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Diptera, Tephritidae)
title_short A phylogenetic assessment of the polyphyletic nature and intraspecific color polymorphism in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex (Diptera, Tephritidae)
title_sort phylogenetic assessment of the polyphyletic nature and intraspecific color polymorphism in the bactrocera dorsalis complex (diptera, tephritidae)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.540.9786
work_keys_str_mv AT leblancluc aphylogeneticassessmentofthepolyphyleticnatureandintraspecificcolorpolymorphisminthebactroceradorsaliscomplexdipteratephritidae
AT sanjosemichael aphylogeneticassessmentofthepolyphyleticnatureandintraspecificcolorpolymorphisminthebactroceradorsaliscomplexdipteratephritidae
AT barrnorman aphylogeneticassessmentofthepolyphyleticnatureandintraspecificcolorpolymorphisminthebactroceradorsaliscomplexdipteratephritidae
AT rubinoffdaniel aphylogeneticassessmentofthepolyphyleticnatureandintraspecificcolorpolymorphisminthebactroceradorsaliscomplexdipteratephritidae
AT leblancluc phylogeneticassessmentofthepolyphyleticnatureandintraspecificcolorpolymorphisminthebactroceradorsaliscomplexdipteratephritidae
AT sanjosemichael phylogeneticassessmentofthepolyphyleticnatureandintraspecificcolorpolymorphisminthebactroceradorsaliscomplexdipteratephritidae
AT barrnorman phylogeneticassessmentofthepolyphyleticnatureandintraspecificcolorpolymorphisminthebactroceradorsaliscomplexdipteratephritidae
AT rubinoffdaniel phylogeneticassessmentofthepolyphyleticnatureandintraspecificcolorpolymorphisminthebactroceradorsaliscomplexdipteratephritidae