Cargando…

Anatomy of the Adductor Magnus Origin: Implications for Proximal Hamstring Injuries

BACKGROUND: The adductor magnus (AM) has historically been a potential source of confusion in patients with suspected proximal hamstring avulsion injuries. PURPOSE: To investigate the anatomic characteristics of the AM, including its osseous origin, anatomic dimensions, and relationship to the proxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obey, Mitchel R., Broski, Stephen M., Spinner, Robert J., Collins, Mark S., Krych, Aaron J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
110
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115625055
_version_ 1782410269110042624
author Obey, Mitchel R.
Broski, Stephen M.
Spinner, Robert J.
Collins, Mark S.
Krych, Aaron J.
author_facet Obey, Mitchel R.
Broski, Stephen M.
Spinner, Robert J.
Collins, Mark S.
Krych, Aaron J.
author_sort Obey, Mitchel R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The adductor magnus (AM) has historically been a potential source of confusion in patients with suspected proximal hamstring avulsion injuries. PURPOSE: To investigate the anatomic characteristics of the AM, including its osseous origin, anatomic dimensions, and relationship to the proximal hamstring tendons. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Dissection of the AM origin was performed in 11 (8 cadavers) fresh-frozen hip-to-foot cadaveric hemipelvis specimens. The gross anatomy and architecture of the proximal hamstring and AM tendons were studied. After dissecting the hamstring tendons away from their origin, the dimension, shape, and orientation of the tendon footprints on the ischial tuberosity were determined. RESULTS: The AM was identified in all cadaveric specimens. The mean tendon thickness (anterior to posterior [AP]) was 5.7 ± 2.9 mm. The mean tendon width (medial to lateral [ML]) was 7.1 ± 2.2 mm. The mean tendon length was 13.1 ± 8.7 cm. The mean footprint height (AP dimension) was 12.1 ± 2.9 mm, and mean footprint width (ML dimension) was 17.3 ± 7.1 mm. The mean distance between the AM footprint and the most medial aspect of the conjoint tendon footprint was 8.5 ± 4.2 mm. Tendon measurements demonstrated a considerable degree of both intra- and interspecimen variability. CONCLUSION: The AM tendon is consistently present just medial to the conjoint tendon at the ischial tuberosity, representing the lateral-most portion of the AM muscle. This study found wide variation in the dimensional characteristics of the AM tendon between specimens. Its shape and location can mimic the appearance of an intact hamstring (conjoint or semimembranosus) tendon intraoperatively or on diagnostic imaging, potentially misleading surgeons and radiologists. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the AM tendon anatomy, footprint anatomy, and its relationship to the hamstring muscle complex is paramount when planning surgical approach and technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The reported data may aid surgeons in more accurate recognition, diagnosis, and repair of proximal hamstring avulsion injuries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4714133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47141332016-01-21 Anatomy of the Adductor Magnus Origin: Implications for Proximal Hamstring Injuries Obey, Mitchel R. Broski, Stephen M. Spinner, Robert J. Collins, Mark S. Krych, Aaron J. Orthop J Sports Med 110 BACKGROUND: The adductor magnus (AM) has historically been a potential source of confusion in patients with suspected proximal hamstring avulsion injuries. PURPOSE: To investigate the anatomic characteristics of the AM, including its osseous origin, anatomic dimensions, and relationship to the proximal hamstring tendons. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Dissection of the AM origin was performed in 11 (8 cadavers) fresh-frozen hip-to-foot cadaveric hemipelvis specimens. The gross anatomy and architecture of the proximal hamstring and AM tendons were studied. After dissecting the hamstring tendons away from their origin, the dimension, shape, and orientation of the tendon footprints on the ischial tuberosity were determined. RESULTS: The AM was identified in all cadaveric specimens. The mean tendon thickness (anterior to posterior [AP]) was 5.7 ± 2.9 mm. The mean tendon width (medial to lateral [ML]) was 7.1 ± 2.2 mm. The mean tendon length was 13.1 ± 8.7 cm. The mean footprint height (AP dimension) was 12.1 ± 2.9 mm, and mean footprint width (ML dimension) was 17.3 ± 7.1 mm. The mean distance between the AM footprint and the most medial aspect of the conjoint tendon footprint was 8.5 ± 4.2 mm. Tendon measurements demonstrated a considerable degree of both intra- and interspecimen variability. CONCLUSION: The AM tendon is consistently present just medial to the conjoint tendon at the ischial tuberosity, representing the lateral-most portion of the AM muscle. This study found wide variation in the dimensional characteristics of the AM tendon between specimens. Its shape and location can mimic the appearance of an intact hamstring (conjoint or semimembranosus) tendon intraoperatively or on diagnostic imaging, potentially misleading surgeons and radiologists. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the AM tendon anatomy, footprint anatomy, and its relationship to the hamstring muscle complex is paramount when planning surgical approach and technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The reported data may aid surgeons in more accurate recognition, diagnosis, and repair of proximal hamstring avulsion injuries. SAGE Publications 2016-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4714133/ /pubmed/26798764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115625055 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 110
Obey, Mitchel R.
Broski, Stephen M.
Spinner, Robert J.
Collins, Mark S.
Krych, Aaron J.
Anatomy of the Adductor Magnus Origin: Implications for Proximal Hamstring Injuries
title Anatomy of the Adductor Magnus Origin: Implications for Proximal Hamstring Injuries
title_full Anatomy of the Adductor Magnus Origin: Implications for Proximal Hamstring Injuries
title_fullStr Anatomy of the Adductor Magnus Origin: Implications for Proximal Hamstring Injuries
title_full_unstemmed Anatomy of the Adductor Magnus Origin: Implications for Proximal Hamstring Injuries
title_short Anatomy of the Adductor Magnus Origin: Implications for Proximal Hamstring Injuries
title_sort anatomy of the adductor magnus origin: implications for proximal hamstring injuries
topic 110
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115625055
work_keys_str_mv AT obeymitchelr anatomyoftheadductormagnusoriginimplicationsforproximalhamstringinjuries
AT broskistephenm anatomyoftheadductormagnusoriginimplicationsforproximalhamstringinjuries
AT spinnerrobertj anatomyoftheadductormagnusoriginimplicationsforproximalhamstringinjuries
AT collinsmarks anatomyoftheadductormagnusoriginimplicationsforproximalhamstringinjuries
AT krychaaronj anatomyoftheadductormagnusoriginimplicationsforproximalhamstringinjuries