Cargando…

Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales

BACKGROUND: Providers of psychological therapies are encouraged to offer patients choice about their treatment, but there is very little information about what preferences people have or the impact that meeting these has on treatment outcomes. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey of people receiving psych...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Ryan, Farquharson, Lorna, Palmer, Lucy, Bassett, Paul, Clarke, Jeremy, Clark, David M., Crawford, Mike J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26768890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0702-8
_version_ 1782410326665330688
author Williams, Ryan
Farquharson, Lorna
Palmer, Lucy
Bassett, Paul
Clarke, Jeremy
Clark, David M.
Crawford, Mike J.
author_facet Williams, Ryan
Farquharson, Lorna
Palmer, Lucy
Bassett, Paul
Clarke, Jeremy
Clark, David M.
Crawford, Mike J.
author_sort Williams, Ryan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Providers of psychological therapies are encouraged to offer patients choice about their treatment, but there is very little information about what preferences people have or the impact that meeting these has on treatment outcomes. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey of people receiving psychological treatment from 184 NHS services in England and Wales. 14,587 respondents were asked about treatment preferences and the extent to which these were met by their service. They were also asked to rate the extent to which therapy helped them cope with their difficulties. RESULTS: Most patients (12,549–86.0 %, 95 % CI: 85.5–86.6) expressed a preference for at least one aspect of their treatment. Of these, 4,600 (36.7 %, 95 % CI: 35.8–37.5) had at least one preference that was not met. While most patients reported that their preference for appointment times, venue and type of treatment were met, only 1,769 (40.5 %) of the 4,253 that had a preference for gender had it met. People who expressed a preference that was not met reported poorer outcomes than those with a preference that was met (Odds Ratios: appointment times = 0.29, venue = 0.32, treatment type = 0.16, therapist gender = 0.32, language in which treatment was delivered = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who took part in this survey had preferences about their treatment. People who reported preferences that were not met were less likely to state that treatment had helped them with their problems. Routinely assessing and meeting patient preferences may improve the outcomes of psychological treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4714467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47144672016-01-16 Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales Williams, Ryan Farquharson, Lorna Palmer, Lucy Bassett, Paul Clarke, Jeremy Clark, David M. Crawford, Mike J. BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Providers of psychological therapies are encouraged to offer patients choice about their treatment, but there is very little information about what preferences people have or the impact that meeting these has on treatment outcomes. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey of people receiving psychological treatment from 184 NHS services in England and Wales. 14,587 respondents were asked about treatment preferences and the extent to which these were met by their service. They were also asked to rate the extent to which therapy helped them cope with their difficulties. RESULTS: Most patients (12,549–86.0 %, 95 % CI: 85.5–86.6) expressed a preference for at least one aspect of their treatment. Of these, 4,600 (36.7 %, 95 % CI: 35.8–37.5) had at least one preference that was not met. While most patients reported that their preference for appointment times, venue and type of treatment were met, only 1,769 (40.5 %) of the 4,253 that had a preference for gender had it met. People who expressed a preference that was not met reported poorer outcomes than those with a preference that was met (Odds Ratios: appointment times = 0.29, venue = 0.32, treatment type = 0.16, therapist gender = 0.32, language in which treatment was delivered = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who took part in this survey had preferences about their treatment. People who reported preferences that were not met were less likely to state that treatment had helped them with their problems. Routinely assessing and meeting patient preferences may improve the outcomes of psychological treatment. BioMed Central 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4714467/ /pubmed/26768890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0702-8 Text en © Williams et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Williams, Ryan
Farquharson, Lorna
Palmer, Lucy
Bassett, Paul
Clarke, Jeremy
Clark, David M.
Crawford, Mike J.
Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales
title Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales
title_full Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales
title_fullStr Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales
title_full_unstemmed Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales
title_short Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales
title_sort patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in england and wales
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26768890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0702-8
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsryan patientpreferenceinpsychologicaltreatmentandassociationswithselfreportedoutcomenationalcrosssectionalsurveyinenglandandwales
AT farquharsonlorna patientpreferenceinpsychologicaltreatmentandassociationswithselfreportedoutcomenationalcrosssectionalsurveyinenglandandwales
AT palmerlucy patientpreferenceinpsychologicaltreatmentandassociationswithselfreportedoutcomenationalcrosssectionalsurveyinenglandandwales
AT bassettpaul patientpreferenceinpsychologicaltreatmentandassociationswithselfreportedoutcomenationalcrosssectionalsurveyinenglandandwales
AT clarkejeremy patientpreferenceinpsychologicaltreatmentandassociationswithselfreportedoutcomenationalcrosssectionalsurveyinenglandandwales
AT clarkdavidm patientpreferenceinpsychologicaltreatmentandassociationswithselfreportedoutcomenationalcrosssectionalsurveyinenglandandwales
AT crawfordmikej patientpreferenceinpsychologicaltreatmentandassociationswithselfreportedoutcomenationalcrosssectionalsurveyinenglandandwales