Cargando…

Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most?

INTRODUCTION: The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) was established for the prehospital trauma care of patients. Improved rescue times and increased coverage areas are discussed as specific advantages of HEMS. We recently found evidence that HEMS exerts beneficial effects on outcomes for s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andruszkow, Hagen, Schweigkofler, Uwe, Lefering, Rolf, Frey, Magnus, Horst, Klemens, Pfeifer, Roman, Beckers, Stefan Kurt, Pape, Hans-Christoph, Hildebrand, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146897
_version_ 1782410373196939264
author Andruszkow, Hagen
Schweigkofler, Uwe
Lefering, Rolf
Frey, Magnus
Horst, Klemens
Pfeifer, Roman
Beckers, Stefan Kurt
Pape, Hans-Christoph
Hildebrand, Frank
author_facet Andruszkow, Hagen
Schweigkofler, Uwe
Lefering, Rolf
Frey, Magnus
Horst, Klemens
Pfeifer, Roman
Beckers, Stefan Kurt
Pape, Hans-Christoph
Hildebrand, Frank
author_sort Andruszkow, Hagen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) was established for the prehospital trauma care of patients. Improved rescue times and increased coverage areas are discussed as specific advantages of HEMS. We recently found evidence that HEMS exerts beneficial effects on outcomes for severely injured patients. However, it still remains unknown which group of trauma patients might benefit most from HEMS rescue. Consequently, the unique aim of this study was to reveal which patients might benefit most from HEMS rescue. METHODS: Trauma patients (ISS ≥9) primarily treated by HEMS or ground emergency medical services (GEMS) between 2002 and 2012 were analysed using the TraumaRegister DGU. A multivariate regression analysis was used to reveal the survival benefit between different trauma populations. RESULTS: The study included 52 281 trauma patients. Of these, 68.8% (35 974) were rescued by GEMS and 31.2% (16 307) by HEMS. HEMS patients were more severely injured compared to GEMS patients (ISS: HEMS 24.8±13.5 vs. GEMS 21.7±18.0) and more frequently suffered traumatic shock (SBP sys <90mmHg: HEMS 18.3% vs. GEMS 14.8%). However, logistic regression analysis revealed that HEMS rescues resulted in an overall survival benefit compared to GEMS (OR 0.81, 95% CI [0.75–0.87], p<0.001, Nagelkerke's R squared 0.526, area under the ROC curve 0.922, 95% CI [0.919–0.925]). Analysis of specific subgroups demonstrated that patients aged older than 55 years (OR 0.62, 95% CI [0.50–0.77]) had the highest survival benefit after HEMS treatment. Furthermore, HEMS rescue had the most significant impact after ‘low falls’ (OR 0.68, 95% CI [0.55–0.84]) and in the case of minor severity injuries (ISS 9–15) (OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.49–0.88]). CONCLUSIONS: In general, trauma patients benefit from HEMS rescue with in-hospital survival as the main outcome parameter. Focusing on special subgroups, middle aged and older patients, low-energy trauma, and minor severity injuries had the highest survival benefit when rescued by HEMS. Further studies are required to determine the potential reasons of this benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4714808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47148082016-01-30 Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most? Andruszkow, Hagen Schweigkofler, Uwe Lefering, Rolf Frey, Magnus Horst, Klemens Pfeifer, Roman Beckers, Stefan Kurt Pape, Hans-Christoph Hildebrand, Frank PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) was established for the prehospital trauma care of patients. Improved rescue times and increased coverage areas are discussed as specific advantages of HEMS. We recently found evidence that HEMS exerts beneficial effects on outcomes for severely injured patients. However, it still remains unknown which group of trauma patients might benefit most from HEMS rescue. Consequently, the unique aim of this study was to reveal which patients might benefit most from HEMS rescue. METHODS: Trauma patients (ISS ≥9) primarily treated by HEMS or ground emergency medical services (GEMS) between 2002 and 2012 were analysed using the TraumaRegister DGU. A multivariate regression analysis was used to reveal the survival benefit between different trauma populations. RESULTS: The study included 52 281 trauma patients. Of these, 68.8% (35 974) were rescued by GEMS and 31.2% (16 307) by HEMS. HEMS patients were more severely injured compared to GEMS patients (ISS: HEMS 24.8±13.5 vs. GEMS 21.7±18.0) and more frequently suffered traumatic shock (SBP sys <90mmHg: HEMS 18.3% vs. GEMS 14.8%). However, logistic regression analysis revealed that HEMS rescues resulted in an overall survival benefit compared to GEMS (OR 0.81, 95% CI [0.75–0.87], p<0.001, Nagelkerke's R squared 0.526, area under the ROC curve 0.922, 95% CI [0.919–0.925]). Analysis of specific subgroups demonstrated that patients aged older than 55 years (OR 0.62, 95% CI [0.50–0.77]) had the highest survival benefit after HEMS treatment. Furthermore, HEMS rescue had the most significant impact after ‘low falls’ (OR 0.68, 95% CI [0.55–0.84]) and in the case of minor severity injuries (ISS 9–15) (OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.49–0.88]). CONCLUSIONS: In general, trauma patients benefit from HEMS rescue with in-hospital survival as the main outcome parameter. Focusing on special subgroups, middle aged and older patients, low-energy trauma, and minor severity injuries had the highest survival benefit when rescued by HEMS. Further studies are required to determine the potential reasons of this benefit. Public Library of Science 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4714808/ /pubmed/26771462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146897 Text en © 2016 Andruszkow et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Andruszkow, Hagen
Schweigkofler, Uwe
Lefering, Rolf
Frey, Magnus
Horst, Klemens
Pfeifer, Roman
Beckers, Stefan Kurt
Pape, Hans-Christoph
Hildebrand, Frank
Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most?
title Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most?
title_full Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most?
title_fullStr Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most?
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most?
title_short Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most?
title_sort impact of helicopter emergency medical service in traumatized patients: which patient benefits most?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146897
work_keys_str_mv AT andruszkowhagen impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost
AT schweigkofleruwe impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost
AT leferingrolf impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost
AT freymagnus impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost
AT horstklemens impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost
AT pfeiferroman impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost
AT beckersstefankurt impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost
AT papehanschristoph impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost
AT hildebrandfrank impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost