Cargando…
Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most?
INTRODUCTION: The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) was established for the prehospital trauma care of patients. Improved rescue times and increased coverage areas are discussed as specific advantages of HEMS. We recently found evidence that HEMS exerts beneficial effects on outcomes for s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146897 |
_version_ | 1782410373196939264 |
---|---|
author | Andruszkow, Hagen Schweigkofler, Uwe Lefering, Rolf Frey, Magnus Horst, Klemens Pfeifer, Roman Beckers, Stefan Kurt Pape, Hans-Christoph Hildebrand, Frank |
author_facet | Andruszkow, Hagen Schweigkofler, Uwe Lefering, Rolf Frey, Magnus Horst, Klemens Pfeifer, Roman Beckers, Stefan Kurt Pape, Hans-Christoph Hildebrand, Frank |
author_sort | Andruszkow, Hagen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) was established for the prehospital trauma care of patients. Improved rescue times and increased coverage areas are discussed as specific advantages of HEMS. We recently found evidence that HEMS exerts beneficial effects on outcomes for severely injured patients. However, it still remains unknown which group of trauma patients might benefit most from HEMS rescue. Consequently, the unique aim of this study was to reveal which patients might benefit most from HEMS rescue. METHODS: Trauma patients (ISS ≥9) primarily treated by HEMS or ground emergency medical services (GEMS) between 2002 and 2012 were analysed using the TraumaRegister DGU. A multivariate regression analysis was used to reveal the survival benefit between different trauma populations. RESULTS: The study included 52 281 trauma patients. Of these, 68.8% (35 974) were rescued by GEMS and 31.2% (16 307) by HEMS. HEMS patients were more severely injured compared to GEMS patients (ISS: HEMS 24.8±13.5 vs. GEMS 21.7±18.0) and more frequently suffered traumatic shock (SBP sys <90mmHg: HEMS 18.3% vs. GEMS 14.8%). However, logistic regression analysis revealed that HEMS rescues resulted in an overall survival benefit compared to GEMS (OR 0.81, 95% CI [0.75–0.87], p<0.001, Nagelkerke's R squared 0.526, area under the ROC curve 0.922, 95% CI [0.919–0.925]). Analysis of specific subgroups demonstrated that patients aged older than 55 years (OR 0.62, 95% CI [0.50–0.77]) had the highest survival benefit after HEMS treatment. Furthermore, HEMS rescue had the most significant impact after ‘low falls’ (OR 0.68, 95% CI [0.55–0.84]) and in the case of minor severity injuries (ISS 9–15) (OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.49–0.88]). CONCLUSIONS: In general, trauma patients benefit from HEMS rescue with in-hospital survival as the main outcome parameter. Focusing on special subgroups, middle aged and older patients, low-energy trauma, and minor severity injuries had the highest survival benefit when rescued by HEMS. Further studies are required to determine the potential reasons of this benefit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4714808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47148082016-01-30 Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most? Andruszkow, Hagen Schweigkofler, Uwe Lefering, Rolf Frey, Magnus Horst, Klemens Pfeifer, Roman Beckers, Stefan Kurt Pape, Hans-Christoph Hildebrand, Frank PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) was established for the prehospital trauma care of patients. Improved rescue times and increased coverage areas are discussed as specific advantages of HEMS. We recently found evidence that HEMS exerts beneficial effects on outcomes for severely injured patients. However, it still remains unknown which group of trauma patients might benefit most from HEMS rescue. Consequently, the unique aim of this study was to reveal which patients might benefit most from HEMS rescue. METHODS: Trauma patients (ISS ≥9) primarily treated by HEMS or ground emergency medical services (GEMS) between 2002 and 2012 were analysed using the TraumaRegister DGU. A multivariate regression analysis was used to reveal the survival benefit between different trauma populations. RESULTS: The study included 52 281 trauma patients. Of these, 68.8% (35 974) were rescued by GEMS and 31.2% (16 307) by HEMS. HEMS patients were more severely injured compared to GEMS patients (ISS: HEMS 24.8±13.5 vs. GEMS 21.7±18.0) and more frequently suffered traumatic shock (SBP sys <90mmHg: HEMS 18.3% vs. GEMS 14.8%). However, logistic regression analysis revealed that HEMS rescues resulted in an overall survival benefit compared to GEMS (OR 0.81, 95% CI [0.75–0.87], p<0.001, Nagelkerke's R squared 0.526, area under the ROC curve 0.922, 95% CI [0.919–0.925]). Analysis of specific subgroups demonstrated that patients aged older than 55 years (OR 0.62, 95% CI [0.50–0.77]) had the highest survival benefit after HEMS treatment. Furthermore, HEMS rescue had the most significant impact after ‘low falls’ (OR 0.68, 95% CI [0.55–0.84]) and in the case of minor severity injuries (ISS 9–15) (OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.49–0.88]). CONCLUSIONS: In general, trauma patients benefit from HEMS rescue with in-hospital survival as the main outcome parameter. Focusing on special subgroups, middle aged and older patients, low-energy trauma, and minor severity injuries had the highest survival benefit when rescued by HEMS. Further studies are required to determine the potential reasons of this benefit. Public Library of Science 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4714808/ /pubmed/26771462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146897 Text en © 2016 Andruszkow et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Andruszkow, Hagen Schweigkofler, Uwe Lefering, Rolf Frey, Magnus Horst, Klemens Pfeifer, Roman Beckers, Stefan Kurt Pape, Hans-Christoph Hildebrand, Frank Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most? |
title | Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most? |
title_full | Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most? |
title_fullStr | Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most? |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most? |
title_short | Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most? |
title_sort | impact of helicopter emergency medical service in traumatized patients: which patient benefits most? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146897 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andruszkowhagen impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost AT schweigkofleruwe impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost AT leferingrolf impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost AT freymagnus impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost AT horstklemens impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost AT pfeiferroman impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost AT beckersstefankurt impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost AT papehanschristoph impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost AT hildebrandfrank impactofhelicopteremergencymedicalserviceintraumatizedpatientswhichpatientbenefitsmost |