Cargando…

Reducing Wildlife Damage with Cost-Effective Management Programmes

Limiting the impact of wildlife damage in a cost effective manner requires an understanding of how control inputs change the occurrence of damage through their effect on animal density. Despite this, there are few studies linking wildlife management (control), with changes in animal abundance and pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krull, Cheryl R., Stanley, Margaret C., Burns, Bruce R., Choquenot, David, Etherington, Thomas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146765
_version_ 1782410373418188800
author Krull, Cheryl R.
Stanley, Margaret C.
Burns, Bruce R.
Choquenot, David
Etherington, Thomas R.
author_facet Krull, Cheryl R.
Stanley, Margaret C.
Burns, Bruce R.
Choquenot, David
Etherington, Thomas R.
author_sort Krull, Cheryl R.
collection PubMed
description Limiting the impact of wildlife damage in a cost effective manner requires an understanding of how control inputs change the occurrence of damage through their effect on animal density. Despite this, there are few studies linking wildlife management (control), with changes in animal abundance and prevailing levels of wildlife damage. We use the impact and management of wild pigs as a case study to demonstrate this linkage. Ground disturbance by wild pigs has become a conservation issue of global concern because of its potential effects on successional changes in vegetation structure and composition, habitat for other species, and functional soil properties. In this study, we used a 3-year pig control programme (ground hunting) undertaken in a temperate rainforest area of northern New Zealand to evaluate effects on pig abundance, and patterns and rates of ground disturbance and ground disturbance recovery and the cost effectiveness of differing control strategies. Control reduced pig densities by over a third of the estimated carrying capacity, but more than halved average prevailing ground disturbance. Rates of new ground disturbance accelerated with increasing pig density, while rates of ground disturbance recovery were not related to prevailing pig density. Stochastic simulation models based on the measured relationships between control, pig density and rate of ground disturbance and recovery indicated that control could reduce ground disturbance substantially. However, the rate at which prevailing ground disturbance was reduced diminished rapidly as more intense, and hence expensive, pig control regimes were simulated. The model produced in this study provides a framework that links conservation of indigenous ecological communities to control inputs through the reduction of wildlife damage and suggests that managers should consider carefully the marginal cost of higher investment in wildlife damage control, relative to its marginal conservation return.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4714809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47148092016-01-30 Reducing Wildlife Damage with Cost-Effective Management Programmes Krull, Cheryl R. Stanley, Margaret C. Burns, Bruce R. Choquenot, David Etherington, Thomas R. PLoS One Research Article Limiting the impact of wildlife damage in a cost effective manner requires an understanding of how control inputs change the occurrence of damage through their effect on animal density. Despite this, there are few studies linking wildlife management (control), with changes in animal abundance and prevailing levels of wildlife damage. We use the impact and management of wild pigs as a case study to demonstrate this linkage. Ground disturbance by wild pigs has become a conservation issue of global concern because of its potential effects on successional changes in vegetation structure and composition, habitat for other species, and functional soil properties. In this study, we used a 3-year pig control programme (ground hunting) undertaken in a temperate rainforest area of northern New Zealand to evaluate effects on pig abundance, and patterns and rates of ground disturbance and ground disturbance recovery and the cost effectiveness of differing control strategies. Control reduced pig densities by over a third of the estimated carrying capacity, but more than halved average prevailing ground disturbance. Rates of new ground disturbance accelerated with increasing pig density, while rates of ground disturbance recovery were not related to prevailing pig density. Stochastic simulation models based on the measured relationships between control, pig density and rate of ground disturbance and recovery indicated that control could reduce ground disturbance substantially. However, the rate at which prevailing ground disturbance was reduced diminished rapidly as more intense, and hence expensive, pig control regimes were simulated. The model produced in this study provides a framework that links conservation of indigenous ecological communities to control inputs through the reduction of wildlife damage and suggests that managers should consider carefully the marginal cost of higher investment in wildlife damage control, relative to its marginal conservation return. Public Library of Science 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4714809/ /pubmed/26771384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146765 Text en © 2016 Krull et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Krull, Cheryl R.
Stanley, Margaret C.
Burns, Bruce R.
Choquenot, David
Etherington, Thomas R.
Reducing Wildlife Damage with Cost-Effective Management Programmes
title Reducing Wildlife Damage with Cost-Effective Management Programmes
title_full Reducing Wildlife Damage with Cost-Effective Management Programmes
title_fullStr Reducing Wildlife Damage with Cost-Effective Management Programmes
title_full_unstemmed Reducing Wildlife Damage with Cost-Effective Management Programmes
title_short Reducing Wildlife Damage with Cost-Effective Management Programmes
title_sort reducing wildlife damage with cost-effective management programmes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146765
work_keys_str_mv AT krullcherylr reducingwildlifedamagewithcosteffectivemanagementprogrammes
AT stanleymargaretc reducingwildlifedamagewithcosteffectivemanagementprogrammes
AT burnsbrucer reducingwildlifedamagewithcosteffectivemanagementprogrammes
AT choquenotdavid reducingwildlifedamagewithcosteffectivemanagementprogrammes
AT etheringtonthomasr reducingwildlifedamagewithcosteffectivemanagementprogrammes