Cargando…
The Use of Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein 10 as a Potential Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Uganda
BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI), the current tests available for the diagnosis of LTBI are limited by their inability to differentiate between LTBI and active TB disease. We investigated IP-10 as a potential biomarker for L...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146098 |
_version_ | 1782410381464961024 |
---|---|
author | Biraro, Irene Andia Kimuda, Simon Egesa, Moses Cose, Stephen Webb, Emily L. Joloba, Moses Smith, Steven G. Elliott, Alison M. Dockrell, Hazel M. Katamba, Achilles |
author_facet | Biraro, Irene Andia Kimuda, Simon Egesa, Moses Cose, Stephen Webb, Emily L. Joloba, Moses Smith, Steven G. Elliott, Alison M. Dockrell, Hazel M. Katamba, Achilles |
author_sort | Biraro, Irene Andia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI), the current tests available for the diagnosis of LTBI are limited by their inability to differentiate between LTBI and active TB disease. We investigated IP-10 as a potential biomarker for LTBI among household contacts exposed to sputum positive active TB cases. METHODS: Active TB cases and contacts were recruited into a cohort with six months’ follow-up. Contacts were tested for LTBI using QuantiFERON(®)-TB Gold In-Tube (QFN) assay and the tuberculin skin test (TST). Baseline supernatants from the QFN assay of 237 contacts and 102 active TB cases were analysed for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) specific and mitogen specific IP-10 responses. RESULTS: Contacts with LTBI (QFN(+)TST(+)) had the highest MTB specific IP-10 responses at baseline, compared to uninfected contacts (QFN(-)TST(-)) p<0.0001; and active cases, p = 0.01. Using a cut-off of 8,239 pg/ml, MTB specific IP-10 was able to diagnose LTBI with a sensitivity of 87.1% (95% CI, 76.2–94.3) and specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 81.3–96.6). MTB specific to mitogen specific IP-10 ratio was higher in HIV negative active TB cases, compared to HIV negative latently infected contacts, p = 0.0004. Concentrations of MTB specific IP-10 were higher in contacts with TST conversion (negative at baseline, positive at 6-months) than in those that were persistently TST negative, p = 0.001. CONCLUSION: IP-10 performed well in differentiating contacts with either latent or active TB from those who were uninfected but was not able to differentiate LTBI from active disease except when MTB specific to mitogen specific ratios were used in HIV negative adults. In addition, IP-10 had the potential to diagnose ‘recent TB infection’ in persons classified as having LTBI using the TST. Such individuals with strong IP-10 responses would likely benefit from chemoprophylaxis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4714877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47148772016-01-30 The Use of Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein 10 as a Potential Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Uganda Biraro, Irene Andia Kimuda, Simon Egesa, Moses Cose, Stephen Webb, Emily L. Joloba, Moses Smith, Steven G. Elliott, Alison M. Dockrell, Hazel M. Katamba, Achilles PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI), the current tests available for the diagnosis of LTBI are limited by their inability to differentiate between LTBI and active TB disease. We investigated IP-10 as a potential biomarker for LTBI among household contacts exposed to sputum positive active TB cases. METHODS: Active TB cases and contacts were recruited into a cohort with six months’ follow-up. Contacts were tested for LTBI using QuantiFERON(®)-TB Gold In-Tube (QFN) assay and the tuberculin skin test (TST). Baseline supernatants from the QFN assay of 237 contacts and 102 active TB cases were analysed for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) specific and mitogen specific IP-10 responses. RESULTS: Contacts with LTBI (QFN(+)TST(+)) had the highest MTB specific IP-10 responses at baseline, compared to uninfected contacts (QFN(-)TST(-)) p<0.0001; and active cases, p = 0.01. Using a cut-off of 8,239 pg/ml, MTB specific IP-10 was able to diagnose LTBI with a sensitivity of 87.1% (95% CI, 76.2–94.3) and specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 81.3–96.6). MTB specific to mitogen specific IP-10 ratio was higher in HIV negative active TB cases, compared to HIV negative latently infected contacts, p = 0.0004. Concentrations of MTB specific IP-10 were higher in contacts with TST conversion (negative at baseline, positive at 6-months) than in those that were persistently TST negative, p = 0.001. CONCLUSION: IP-10 performed well in differentiating contacts with either latent or active TB from those who were uninfected but was not able to differentiate LTBI from active disease except when MTB specific to mitogen specific ratios were used in HIV negative adults. In addition, IP-10 had the potential to diagnose ‘recent TB infection’ in persons classified as having LTBI using the TST. Such individuals with strong IP-10 responses would likely benefit from chemoprophylaxis. Public Library of Science 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4714877/ /pubmed/26771653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146098 Text en © 2016 Biraro et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Biraro, Irene Andia Kimuda, Simon Egesa, Moses Cose, Stephen Webb, Emily L. Joloba, Moses Smith, Steven G. Elliott, Alison M. Dockrell, Hazel M. Katamba, Achilles The Use of Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein 10 as a Potential Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Uganda |
title | The Use of Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein 10 as a Potential Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Uganda |
title_full | The Use of Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein 10 as a Potential Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Uganda |
title_fullStr | The Use of Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein 10 as a Potential Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein 10 as a Potential Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Uganda |
title_short | The Use of Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein 10 as a Potential Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Uganda |
title_sort | use of interferon gamma inducible protein 10 as a potential biomarker in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in uganda |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146098 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biraroireneandia theuseofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT kimudasimon theuseofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT egesamoses theuseofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT cosestephen theuseofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT webbemilyl theuseofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT jolobamoses theuseofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT smithsteveng theuseofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT elliottalisonm theuseofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT dockrellhazelm theuseofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT katambaachilles theuseofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT biraroireneandia useofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT kimudasimon useofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT egesamoses useofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT cosestephen useofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT webbemilyl useofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT jolobamoses useofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT smithsteveng useofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT elliottalisonm useofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT dockrellhazelm useofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda AT katambaachilles useofinterferongammainducibleprotein10asapotentialbiomarkerinthediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninuganda |