Cargando…

Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the torque efficacy of square and rectangular wires in 0.018- and 0.022-in. conventionally ligated brackets. METHODS: Brackets of the same prescription were evaluated in both slot dimensions. Identical acrylic resin models of the maxilla were bonded w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papageorgiou, Spyridon N., Sifakakis, Iosif, Doulis, Ioannis, Eliades, Theodore, Bourauel, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26780465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0118-0
_version_ 1782410402493104128
author Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
Sifakakis, Iosif
Doulis, Ioannis
Eliades, Theodore
Bourauel, Christoph
author_facet Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
Sifakakis, Iosif
Doulis, Ioannis
Eliades, Theodore
Bourauel, Christoph
author_sort Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the torque efficacy of square and rectangular wires in 0.018- and 0.022-in. conventionally ligated brackets. METHODS: Brackets of the same prescription were evaluated in both slot dimensions. Identical acrylic resin models of the maxilla were bonded with the brackets and mounted on the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System. Ten 0.018 × 0.018 in., 0.018 × 0.022 in., and 0.018 × 0.025 in. stainless steel wires were evaluated in the 0.018-in. brackets and ten 0.019 × 0.019 in., 0.019 × 0.025 in., and 0.019 × 0.026 in. stainless steel wires were evaluated in the 0.022-in. brackets. A 15° buccal root torque was gradually applied to the right central incisor bracket, and the moments were recorded at this position. One-way ANOVA was applied for both bracket slot sizes along with post hoc analysis for the various archwire sizes. RESULTS: The mean measured moments varied between 10.78 and 30.60 Nmm among the assessed wire-and-bracket combinations. Both square and rectangular archwires in the 0.018-in. bracket system exerted statistically significantly higher moments in comparison with their counterparts in the 0.022-in. bracket system. Rectangular archwires exerted statistically significantly higher moments than square archwires, both for the 0.018- and the 0.022-in. bracket system. CONCLUSIONS: Rectangular archwires seem to be more efficient in torque exertion, especially in 0.018-in. brackets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4715034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47150342016-01-31 Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets Papageorgiou, Spyridon N. Sifakakis, Iosif Doulis, Ioannis Eliades, Theodore Bourauel, Christoph Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the torque efficacy of square and rectangular wires in 0.018- and 0.022-in. conventionally ligated brackets. METHODS: Brackets of the same prescription were evaluated in both slot dimensions. Identical acrylic resin models of the maxilla were bonded with the brackets and mounted on the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System. Ten 0.018 × 0.018 in., 0.018 × 0.022 in., and 0.018 × 0.025 in. stainless steel wires were evaluated in the 0.018-in. brackets and ten 0.019 × 0.019 in., 0.019 × 0.025 in., and 0.019 × 0.026 in. stainless steel wires were evaluated in the 0.022-in. brackets. A 15° buccal root torque was gradually applied to the right central incisor bracket, and the moments were recorded at this position. One-way ANOVA was applied for both bracket slot sizes along with post hoc analysis for the various archwire sizes. RESULTS: The mean measured moments varied between 10.78 and 30.60 Nmm among the assessed wire-and-bracket combinations. Both square and rectangular archwires in the 0.018-in. bracket system exerted statistically significantly higher moments in comparison with their counterparts in the 0.022-in. bracket system. Rectangular archwires exerted statistically significantly higher moments than square archwires, both for the 0.018- and the 0.022-in. bracket system. CONCLUSIONS: Rectangular archwires seem to be more efficient in torque exertion, especially in 0.018-in. brackets. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4715034/ /pubmed/26780465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0118-0 Text en © Papageorgiou et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
Sifakakis, Iosif
Doulis, Ioannis
Eliades, Theodore
Bourauel, Christoph
Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets
title Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets
title_full Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets
title_fullStr Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets
title_full_unstemmed Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets
title_short Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets
title_sort torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26780465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0118-0
work_keys_str_mv AT papageorgiouspyridonn torqueefficiencyofsquareandrectangulararchwiresinto0018and0022inconventionalbrackets
AT sifakakisiosif torqueefficiencyofsquareandrectangulararchwiresinto0018and0022inconventionalbrackets
AT doulisioannis torqueefficiencyofsquareandrectangulararchwiresinto0018and0022inconventionalbrackets
AT eliadestheodore torqueefficiencyofsquareandrectangulararchwiresinto0018and0022inconventionalbrackets
AT bourauelchristoph torqueefficiencyofsquareandrectangulararchwiresinto0018and0022inconventionalbrackets