Cargando…

Development and validation of clinical performance assessment in simulated medical emergencies: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Critical illness is a time-sensitive process which requires practitioners to process vast quantities of data and make decisions rapidly. We have developed a tool, the Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness (CERTAIN), aimed at enhancing care delivery in such situat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erdogan, Aysen, Dong, Yue, Chen, Xiaomei, Schmickl, Christopher, Sevilla Berrios, Ronaldo A., Garcia Arguello, Lisbeth Y., Kashyap, Rahul, Kilickaya, Oguz, Pickering, Brian, Gajic, Ognjen, O’Horo, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26772732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0066-x
_version_ 1782410442948214784
author Erdogan, Aysen
Dong, Yue
Chen, Xiaomei
Schmickl, Christopher
Sevilla Berrios, Ronaldo A.
Garcia Arguello, Lisbeth Y.
Kashyap, Rahul
Kilickaya, Oguz
Pickering, Brian
Gajic, Ognjen
O’Horo, John C.
author_facet Erdogan, Aysen
Dong, Yue
Chen, Xiaomei
Schmickl, Christopher
Sevilla Berrios, Ronaldo A.
Garcia Arguello, Lisbeth Y.
Kashyap, Rahul
Kilickaya, Oguz
Pickering, Brian
Gajic, Ognjen
O’Horo, John C.
author_sort Erdogan, Aysen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Critical illness is a time-sensitive process which requires practitioners to process vast quantities of data and make decisions rapidly. We have developed a tool, the Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness (CERTAIN), aimed at enhancing care delivery in such situations. To determine the efficacy of CERTAIN and similar cognitive aids, we developed rubric for evaluating provider performance in a simulated medical resuscitation environments. METHODS: We recruited 18 clinicians with current valid ACLS certification for evaluation in three simulated medical scenarios designed to mimic typical medical decompensation events routinely experienced in clinical care. Subjects were stratified as experienced or novice based on prior critical care training. A checklist of critical actions was designed using face validity for each scenario to evaluate task completion and performance. Simulation sessions were video recorded and scored by two independent raters. Construct validity was assessed under the assumption that experienced clinicians should perform better than novice clinicians on each task. Reliability was assessed as percentage agreement, kappa statistics and Bland-Altman plots as appropriate. RESULTS: Eleven experts and seven novices completed evaluation. The overall agreement on common checklist item completion was 84.8 %. The overall model achieved face validity and was consistent with our construct, with experienced clinicians trending towards better performance compared to novices for accuracy and speed of task completion. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized video assessment tool has potential to provide a valid and reliable method to assess 12 performances of clinicians facing simulated medical emergencies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12873-015-0066-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4715281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47152812016-01-17 Development and validation of clinical performance assessment in simulated medical emergencies: an observational study Erdogan, Aysen Dong, Yue Chen, Xiaomei Schmickl, Christopher Sevilla Berrios, Ronaldo A. Garcia Arguello, Lisbeth Y. Kashyap, Rahul Kilickaya, Oguz Pickering, Brian Gajic, Ognjen O’Horo, John C. BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Critical illness is a time-sensitive process which requires practitioners to process vast quantities of data and make decisions rapidly. We have developed a tool, the Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness (CERTAIN), aimed at enhancing care delivery in such situations. To determine the efficacy of CERTAIN and similar cognitive aids, we developed rubric for evaluating provider performance in a simulated medical resuscitation environments. METHODS: We recruited 18 clinicians with current valid ACLS certification for evaluation in three simulated medical scenarios designed to mimic typical medical decompensation events routinely experienced in clinical care. Subjects were stratified as experienced or novice based on prior critical care training. A checklist of critical actions was designed using face validity for each scenario to evaluate task completion and performance. Simulation sessions were video recorded and scored by two independent raters. Construct validity was assessed under the assumption that experienced clinicians should perform better than novice clinicians on each task. Reliability was assessed as percentage agreement, kappa statistics and Bland-Altman plots as appropriate. RESULTS: Eleven experts and seven novices completed evaluation. The overall agreement on common checklist item completion was 84.8 %. The overall model achieved face validity and was consistent with our construct, with experienced clinicians trending towards better performance compared to novices for accuracy and speed of task completion. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized video assessment tool has potential to provide a valid and reliable method to assess 12 performances of clinicians facing simulated medical emergencies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12873-015-0066-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4715281/ /pubmed/26772732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0066-x Text en © Erdogan et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Erdogan, Aysen
Dong, Yue
Chen, Xiaomei
Schmickl, Christopher
Sevilla Berrios, Ronaldo A.
Garcia Arguello, Lisbeth Y.
Kashyap, Rahul
Kilickaya, Oguz
Pickering, Brian
Gajic, Ognjen
O’Horo, John C.
Development and validation of clinical performance assessment in simulated medical emergencies: an observational study
title Development and validation of clinical performance assessment in simulated medical emergencies: an observational study
title_full Development and validation of clinical performance assessment in simulated medical emergencies: an observational study
title_fullStr Development and validation of clinical performance assessment in simulated medical emergencies: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of clinical performance assessment in simulated medical emergencies: an observational study
title_short Development and validation of clinical performance assessment in simulated medical emergencies: an observational study
title_sort development and validation of clinical performance assessment in simulated medical emergencies: an observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26772732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0066-x
work_keys_str_mv AT erdoganaysen developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy
AT dongyue developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy
AT chenxiaomei developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy
AT schmicklchristopher developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy
AT sevillaberriosronaldoa developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy
AT garciaarguellolisbethy developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy
AT kashyaprahul developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy
AT kilickayaoguz developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy
AT pickeringbrian developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy
AT gajicognjen developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy
AT ohorojohnc developmentandvalidationofclinicalperformanceassessmentinsimulatedmedicalemergenciesanobservationalstudy