Cargando…
Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study
BACKGROUND: Student engagement is an important domain for medical education, however, it is difficult to quantify. The goal of this study was to investigate the utility of virtual patient simulations (VPS) for increasing medical student engagement. Our aims were specifically to investigate how and t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7 |
_version_ | 1782410448954458112 |
---|---|
author | McCoy, Lise Pettit, Robin K. Lewis, Joy H. Allgood, J. Aaron Bay, Curt Schwartz, Frederic N. |
author_facet | McCoy, Lise Pettit, Robin K. Lewis, Joy H. Allgood, J. Aaron Bay, Curt Schwartz, Frederic N. |
author_sort | McCoy, Lise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Student engagement is an important domain for medical education, however, it is difficult to quantify. The goal of this study was to investigate the utility of virtual patient simulations (VPS) for increasing medical student engagement. Our aims were specifically to investigate how and to what extent the VPS foster student engagement. This study took place at A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona (ATSU-SOMA), in the USA. METHODS: First year medical students (n = 108) worked in teams to complete a series of four in-class virtual patient case studies. Student engagement was measured, defined as flow, interest, and relevance. These dimensions were measured using four data collection instruments: researcher observations, classroom photographs, tutor feedback, and an electronic exit survey. Qualitative data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Triangulation of findings between the four data sources indicate that VPS foster engagement in three facets: 1. Flow. In general, students enjoyed the activities, and were absorbed in the task at hand. 2. Interest. Students demonstrated interest in the activities, as evidenced by enjoyment, active discussion, and humor. Students remarked upon elements that caused cognitive dissonance: excessive text and classroom noise generated by multi-media and peer conversations. 3. Relevance. VPS were relevant, in terms of situational clinical practice, exam preparation, and obtaining concrete feedback on clinical decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers successfully introduced a new learning platform into the medical school curriculum. The data collected during this study were also used to improve new learning modules and techniques associated with implementing them in the classroom. Results of this study assert that virtual patient simulations foster engagement in terms of flow, relevance, and interest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4715308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47153082016-01-17 Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study McCoy, Lise Pettit, Robin K. Lewis, Joy H. Allgood, J. Aaron Bay, Curt Schwartz, Frederic N. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Student engagement is an important domain for medical education, however, it is difficult to quantify. The goal of this study was to investigate the utility of virtual patient simulations (VPS) for increasing medical student engagement. Our aims were specifically to investigate how and to what extent the VPS foster student engagement. This study took place at A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona (ATSU-SOMA), in the USA. METHODS: First year medical students (n = 108) worked in teams to complete a series of four in-class virtual patient case studies. Student engagement was measured, defined as flow, interest, and relevance. These dimensions were measured using four data collection instruments: researcher observations, classroom photographs, tutor feedback, and an electronic exit survey. Qualitative data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Triangulation of findings between the four data sources indicate that VPS foster engagement in three facets: 1. Flow. In general, students enjoyed the activities, and were absorbed in the task at hand. 2. Interest. Students demonstrated interest in the activities, as evidenced by enjoyment, active discussion, and humor. Students remarked upon elements that caused cognitive dissonance: excessive text and classroom noise generated by multi-media and peer conversations. 3. Relevance. VPS were relevant, in terms of situational clinical practice, exam preparation, and obtaining concrete feedback on clinical decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers successfully introduced a new learning platform into the medical school curriculum. The data collected during this study were also used to improve new learning modules and techniques associated with implementing them in the classroom. Results of this study assert that virtual patient simulations foster engagement in terms of flow, relevance, and interest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4715308/ /pubmed/26774892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7 Text en © McCoy et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McCoy, Lise Pettit, Robin K. Lewis, Joy H. Allgood, J. Aaron Bay, Curt Schwartz, Frederic N. Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study |
title | Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study |
title_full | Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study |
title_short | Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study |
title_sort | evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccoylise evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy AT pettitrobink evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy AT lewisjoyh evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy AT allgoodjaaron evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy AT baycurt evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy AT schwartzfredericn evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy |