Cargando…

Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Student engagement is an important domain for medical education, however, it is difficult to quantify. The goal of this study was to investigate the utility of virtual patient simulations (VPS) for increasing medical student engagement. Our aims were specifically to investigate how and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCoy, Lise, Pettit, Robin K., Lewis, Joy H., Allgood, J. Aaron, Bay, Curt, Schwartz, Frederic N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7
_version_ 1782410448954458112
author McCoy, Lise
Pettit, Robin K.
Lewis, Joy H.
Allgood, J. Aaron
Bay, Curt
Schwartz, Frederic N.
author_facet McCoy, Lise
Pettit, Robin K.
Lewis, Joy H.
Allgood, J. Aaron
Bay, Curt
Schwartz, Frederic N.
author_sort McCoy, Lise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Student engagement is an important domain for medical education, however, it is difficult to quantify. The goal of this study was to investigate the utility of virtual patient simulations (VPS) for increasing medical student engagement. Our aims were specifically to investigate how and to what extent the VPS foster student engagement. This study took place at A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona (ATSU-SOMA), in the USA. METHODS: First year medical students (n = 108) worked in teams to complete a series of four in-class virtual patient case studies. Student engagement was measured, defined as flow, interest, and relevance. These dimensions were measured using four data collection instruments: researcher observations, classroom photographs, tutor feedback, and an electronic exit survey. Qualitative data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Triangulation of findings between the four data sources indicate that VPS foster engagement in three facets: 1. Flow. In general, students enjoyed the activities, and were absorbed in the task at hand. 2. Interest. Students demonstrated interest in the activities, as evidenced by enjoyment, active discussion, and humor. Students remarked upon elements that caused cognitive dissonance: excessive text and classroom noise generated by multi-media and peer conversations. 3. Relevance. VPS were relevant, in terms of situational clinical practice, exam preparation, and obtaining concrete feedback on clinical decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers successfully introduced a new learning platform into the medical school curriculum. The data collected during this study were also used to improve new learning modules and techniques associated with implementing them in the classroom. Results of this study assert that virtual patient simulations foster engagement in terms of flow, relevance, and interest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4715308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47153082016-01-17 Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study McCoy, Lise Pettit, Robin K. Lewis, Joy H. Allgood, J. Aaron Bay, Curt Schwartz, Frederic N. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Student engagement is an important domain for medical education, however, it is difficult to quantify. The goal of this study was to investigate the utility of virtual patient simulations (VPS) for increasing medical student engagement. Our aims were specifically to investigate how and to what extent the VPS foster student engagement. This study took place at A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona (ATSU-SOMA), in the USA. METHODS: First year medical students (n = 108) worked in teams to complete a series of four in-class virtual patient case studies. Student engagement was measured, defined as flow, interest, and relevance. These dimensions were measured using four data collection instruments: researcher observations, classroom photographs, tutor feedback, and an electronic exit survey. Qualitative data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Triangulation of findings between the four data sources indicate that VPS foster engagement in three facets: 1. Flow. In general, students enjoyed the activities, and were absorbed in the task at hand. 2. Interest. Students demonstrated interest in the activities, as evidenced by enjoyment, active discussion, and humor. Students remarked upon elements that caused cognitive dissonance: excessive text and classroom noise generated by multi-media and peer conversations. 3. Relevance. VPS were relevant, in terms of situational clinical practice, exam preparation, and obtaining concrete feedback on clinical decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers successfully introduced a new learning platform into the medical school curriculum. The data collected during this study were also used to improve new learning modules and techniques associated with implementing them in the classroom. Results of this study assert that virtual patient simulations foster engagement in terms of flow, relevance, and interest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4715308/ /pubmed/26774892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7 Text en © McCoy et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McCoy, Lise
Pettit, Robin K.
Lewis, Joy H.
Allgood, J. Aaron
Bay, Curt
Schwartz, Frederic N.
Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study
title Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study
title_full Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study
title_fullStr Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study
title_short Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study
title_sort evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mccoylise evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy
AT pettitrobink evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy
AT lewisjoyh evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy
AT allgoodjaaron evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy
AT baycurt evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy
AT schwartzfredericn evaluatingmedicalstudentengagementduringvirtualpatientsimulationsasequentialmixedmethodsstudy