Cargando…

DAS steered therapy in clinical practice; cross-sectional results from the METEOR database

BACKGROUND: Little is known on how well targeted treatment, for instance targeting towards low DAS, is implemented in clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate treatment adjustments in response to DAS in RA patients in clinical practice. METHODS: We used data from one referral centre, multiple rheu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gvozdenović, Emilia, Wolterbeek, Ron, van der Heijde, Désirée, Huizinga, Tom, Allaart, Cornelia, Landewé, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0878-1
_version_ 1782410453933096960
author Gvozdenović, Emilia
Wolterbeek, Ron
van der Heijde, Désirée
Huizinga, Tom
Allaart, Cornelia
Landewé, Robert
author_facet Gvozdenović, Emilia
Wolterbeek, Ron
van der Heijde, Désirée
Huizinga, Tom
Allaart, Cornelia
Landewé, Robert
author_sort Gvozdenović, Emilia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known on how well targeted treatment, for instance targeting towards low DAS, is implemented in clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate treatment adjustments in response to DAS in RA patients in clinical practice. METHODS: We used data from one referral centre, multiple rheumatologists, from the METEOR database. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were used to assess whether in case of non-low disease activity (DAS > 2.4) treatment intensifications in DMARD therapy occurred ((change or increase in dose or number of DMARDs, including synthetic (s)DMARDs, biologic (b)DMARDs and corticosteroids compared to the visit before)). Determinants of not intensifying the treatment when DAS > 2.4 were investigated using GEE. RESULTS: Five thousand one hundred fifty-seven registered visits of 1202 patients were available for the analyses. A DAS > 2.4 was weakly (OR: 1.19; 95 % CI 1.07–1.33) associated with a treatment intensification. In 69 % (n = 3577) of the visits patients were in low disease activity. In 66 % (n = 1028) of the visits with DAS > 2.4 treatment was not intensified. These patients had a higher tender joint count and received more often methotrexate plus a bDMARD, or csDMARD monotherapy, as compared to patients that received treatment intensification. CONCLUSION: In the majority of visits in the METEOR database patients were already in a state of low disease activity, reflecting appropriate treatment intensity. When DAS was greater than 2.4, treatment was often not intensified due to high tender joint count or specific treatment combinations. This data suggest that while aiming for low DAS, physicians per patient weigh whether all DAS elements indicate disease activity or will respond to DMARD adjustment or not, and make treatment decisions accordingly. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-0878-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4715330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47153302016-01-17 DAS steered therapy in clinical practice; cross-sectional results from the METEOR database Gvozdenović, Emilia Wolterbeek, Ron van der Heijde, Désirée Huizinga, Tom Allaart, Cornelia Landewé, Robert BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Little is known on how well targeted treatment, for instance targeting towards low DAS, is implemented in clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate treatment adjustments in response to DAS in RA patients in clinical practice. METHODS: We used data from one referral centre, multiple rheumatologists, from the METEOR database. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were used to assess whether in case of non-low disease activity (DAS > 2.4) treatment intensifications in DMARD therapy occurred ((change or increase in dose or number of DMARDs, including synthetic (s)DMARDs, biologic (b)DMARDs and corticosteroids compared to the visit before)). Determinants of not intensifying the treatment when DAS > 2.4 were investigated using GEE. RESULTS: Five thousand one hundred fifty-seven registered visits of 1202 patients were available for the analyses. A DAS > 2.4 was weakly (OR: 1.19; 95 % CI 1.07–1.33) associated with a treatment intensification. In 69 % (n = 3577) of the visits patients were in low disease activity. In 66 % (n = 1028) of the visits with DAS > 2.4 treatment was not intensified. These patients had a higher tender joint count and received more often methotrexate plus a bDMARD, or csDMARD monotherapy, as compared to patients that received treatment intensification. CONCLUSION: In the majority of visits in the METEOR database patients were already in a state of low disease activity, reflecting appropriate treatment intensity. When DAS was greater than 2.4, treatment was often not intensified due to high tender joint count or specific treatment combinations. This data suggest that while aiming for low DAS, physicians per patient weigh whether all DAS elements indicate disease activity or will respond to DMARD adjustment or not, and make treatment decisions accordingly. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-0878-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4715330/ /pubmed/26774261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0878-1 Text en © Gvozdenović et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gvozdenović, Emilia
Wolterbeek, Ron
van der Heijde, Désirée
Huizinga, Tom
Allaart, Cornelia
Landewé, Robert
DAS steered therapy in clinical practice; cross-sectional results from the METEOR database
title DAS steered therapy in clinical practice; cross-sectional results from the METEOR database
title_full DAS steered therapy in clinical practice; cross-sectional results from the METEOR database
title_fullStr DAS steered therapy in clinical practice; cross-sectional results from the METEOR database
title_full_unstemmed DAS steered therapy in clinical practice; cross-sectional results from the METEOR database
title_short DAS steered therapy in clinical practice; cross-sectional results from the METEOR database
title_sort das steered therapy in clinical practice; cross-sectional results from the meteor database
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0878-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gvozdenovicemilia dassteeredtherapyinclinicalpracticecrosssectionalresultsfromthemeteordatabase
AT wolterbeekron dassteeredtherapyinclinicalpracticecrosssectionalresultsfromthemeteordatabase
AT vanderheijdedesiree dassteeredtherapyinclinicalpracticecrosssectionalresultsfromthemeteordatabase
AT huizingatom dassteeredtherapyinclinicalpracticecrosssectionalresultsfromthemeteordatabase
AT allaartcornelia dassteeredtherapyinclinicalpracticecrosssectionalresultsfromthemeteordatabase
AT landewerobert dassteeredtherapyinclinicalpracticecrosssectionalresultsfromthemeteordatabase