Cargando…

Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Penile cancer, although rare, is one of the common genitourinary cancers in India affecting mostly aged uncircumcised males. For patients presenting with small superficial lesions < 3 cm restricted to glans, surgery, radical external radiation or brachytherapy may be offered, the latter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bindal, Arpita, Mahantshetty, Umesh, Tambe, Chandrashekhar M., Ghadi, Yogesh, Murthy, Vedang, Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816509
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2015.56410
_version_ 1782410504880259072
author Bindal, Arpita
Mahantshetty, Umesh
Tambe, Chandrashekhar M.
Ghadi, Yogesh
Murthy, Vedang
Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore
author_facet Bindal, Arpita
Mahantshetty, Umesh
Tambe, Chandrashekhar M.
Ghadi, Yogesh
Murthy, Vedang
Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore
author_sort Bindal, Arpita
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Penile cancer, although rare, is one of the common genitourinary cancers in India affecting mostly aged uncircumcised males. For patients presenting with small superficial lesions < 3 cm restricted to glans, surgery, radical external radiation or brachytherapy may be offered, the latter being preferred as it allows organ and function preservation. In patients receiving brachytherapy, testicular morbidity is not commonly addressed. With an aim to minimize and document the doses to testis after adequate shielding during radical interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancers, we undertook this study in 2 patients undergoing brachytherapy and forms the basis of this report. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two patients with early stage penile cancer limited to the glans were treated with radical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using interstitial implant. A total of 7-8 tubes were implanted in two planes, parallel to the penile shaft. A total dose of 44-48 Gy (55-60 Gy EQD2 doses with α/β = 10) was delivered in 11-12 fractions of 4 Gy each delivered twice daily. Lead sheets adding to 11 mm (4-5 half value layer) were interposed between the penile shaft and scrotum. The testicular dose was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. For each patient, dosimetry was done for 3 fractions and mean calculated. RESULTS: The cumulative testicular dose to left and right testis was 31.68 cGy and 42.79 cGy for patient A, and 21.96 cGy and 23.28 cGy for patient B. For the same patients, the mean cumulative dose measured at the posterior aspect of penile shaft was 722.15 cGy and 807.72 cGy, amounting to 16.4% and 16.8% of the prescribed dose. Hence, the application of lead shield 11 mm thick reduced testicular dose from 722-808 cGy to 21.96-42.57 cGy, an “absolute reduction” of 95.99 ± 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of a simple lead shield as described, we were able to effectively reduce testicular dose from “spermicidal” range to “oligospermic” range with possible reversibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4716126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47161262016-01-26 Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy Bindal, Arpita Mahantshetty, Umesh Tambe, Chandrashekhar M. Ghadi, Yogesh Murthy, Vedang Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore J Contemp Brachytherapy Case Report PURPOSE: Penile cancer, although rare, is one of the common genitourinary cancers in India affecting mostly aged uncircumcised males. For patients presenting with small superficial lesions < 3 cm restricted to glans, surgery, radical external radiation or brachytherapy may be offered, the latter being preferred as it allows organ and function preservation. In patients receiving brachytherapy, testicular morbidity is not commonly addressed. With an aim to minimize and document the doses to testis after adequate shielding during radical interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancers, we undertook this study in 2 patients undergoing brachytherapy and forms the basis of this report. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two patients with early stage penile cancer limited to the glans were treated with radical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using interstitial implant. A total of 7-8 tubes were implanted in two planes, parallel to the penile shaft. A total dose of 44-48 Gy (55-60 Gy EQD2 doses with α/β = 10) was delivered in 11-12 fractions of 4 Gy each delivered twice daily. Lead sheets adding to 11 mm (4-5 half value layer) were interposed between the penile shaft and scrotum. The testicular dose was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. For each patient, dosimetry was done for 3 fractions and mean calculated. RESULTS: The cumulative testicular dose to left and right testis was 31.68 cGy and 42.79 cGy for patient A, and 21.96 cGy and 23.28 cGy for patient B. For the same patients, the mean cumulative dose measured at the posterior aspect of penile shaft was 722.15 cGy and 807.72 cGy, amounting to 16.4% and 16.8% of the prescribed dose. Hence, the application of lead shield 11 mm thick reduced testicular dose from 722-808 cGy to 21.96-42.57 cGy, an “absolute reduction” of 95.99 ± 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of a simple lead shield as described, we were able to effectively reduce testicular dose from “spermicidal” range to “oligospermic” range with possible reversibility. Termedia Publishing House 2015-12-16 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4716126/ /pubmed/26816509 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2015.56410 Text en Copyright © 2015 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Case Report
Bindal, Arpita
Mahantshetty, Umesh
Tambe, Chandrashekhar M.
Ghadi, Yogesh
Murthy, Vedang
Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore
Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy
title Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy
title_full Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy
title_fullStr Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy
title_short Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy
title_sort testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816509
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2015.56410
work_keys_str_mv AT bindalarpita testicularshieldinginpenilebrachytherapy
AT mahantshettyumesh testicularshieldinginpenilebrachytherapy
AT tambechandrashekharm testicularshieldinginpenilebrachytherapy
AT ghadiyogesh testicularshieldinginpenilebrachytherapy
AT murthyvedang testicularshieldinginpenilebrachytherapy
AT shrivastavashyamkishore testicularshieldinginpenilebrachytherapy