Cargando…

Calcium channel blockers and cancer: a risk analysis using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

OBJECTIVE: The evidence of an association between calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and cancer is conflicting. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the risk of cancer (all, breast, prostate and colon cancers) in association with exposure to CCB. METHODS: This is a population-based cohort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grimaldi-Bensouda, Lamiae, Klungel, Olaf, Kurz, Xavier, de Groot, Mark C H, Maciel Afonso, Ana S, de Bruin, Marie L, Reynolds, Robert, Rossignol, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26747033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009147
_version_ 1782410515353436160
author Grimaldi-Bensouda, Lamiae
Klungel, Olaf
Kurz, Xavier
de Groot, Mark C H
Maciel Afonso, Ana S
de Bruin, Marie L
Reynolds, Robert
Rossignol, Michel
author_facet Grimaldi-Bensouda, Lamiae
Klungel, Olaf
Kurz, Xavier
de Groot, Mark C H
Maciel Afonso, Ana S
de Bruin, Marie L
Reynolds, Robert
Rossignol, Michel
author_sort Grimaldi-Bensouda, Lamiae
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The evidence of an association between calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and cancer is conflicting. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the risk of cancer (all, breast, prostate and colon cancers) in association with exposure to CCB. METHODS: This is a population-based cohort study in patients exposed to CCBs from across the UK, using two comparison cohorts: (1) patients with no exposure to CCB (non-CCB) matched on age and gender and (2) unmatched patients unexposed to CCB and at least one other antihypertensive (AHT) prescription. Cancer incidence rates computed in the exposed and the two unexposed groups were compared using HRs and 95% CIs obtained from multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 150 750, 557 931 and 156 966 patients were included, respectively, in the CCB, non-CCB and AHT cohorts. Crude cancer incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 16.51, 15.75 and 10.62 for the three cohorts, respectively. Adjusted HRs (CI) for all cancers comparing CCB, non-CCB and AHT cohorts were 0.88 (0.86 to 0.89) and 1.01 (0.98 to 1.04), respectively. Compared to the AHT cohort, adjusted HRs (CI) for breast, prostate and colon cancer for the CCB cohort were 0.95 (0.87 to 1.04), 1.07 (0.98 to 1.16) and 0.89 (0.81 to 0.98), respectively. Analyses by duration of exposure to CCB did not show excess risk. CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based study provides strong evidence that CCB use is not associated with an increased risk of cancer. The analyses yielded robust results across all types of cancer and different durations of exposure to CCBs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4716173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47161732016-01-31 Calcium channel blockers and cancer: a risk analysis using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Grimaldi-Bensouda, Lamiae Klungel, Olaf Kurz, Xavier de Groot, Mark C H Maciel Afonso, Ana S de Bruin, Marie L Reynolds, Robert Rossignol, Michel BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: The evidence of an association between calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and cancer is conflicting. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the risk of cancer (all, breast, prostate and colon cancers) in association with exposure to CCB. METHODS: This is a population-based cohort study in patients exposed to CCBs from across the UK, using two comparison cohorts: (1) patients with no exposure to CCB (non-CCB) matched on age and gender and (2) unmatched patients unexposed to CCB and at least one other antihypertensive (AHT) prescription. Cancer incidence rates computed in the exposed and the two unexposed groups were compared using HRs and 95% CIs obtained from multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 150 750, 557 931 and 156 966 patients were included, respectively, in the CCB, non-CCB and AHT cohorts. Crude cancer incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 16.51, 15.75 and 10.62 for the three cohorts, respectively. Adjusted HRs (CI) for all cancers comparing CCB, non-CCB and AHT cohorts were 0.88 (0.86 to 0.89) and 1.01 (0.98 to 1.04), respectively. Compared to the AHT cohort, adjusted HRs (CI) for breast, prostate and colon cancer for the CCB cohort were 0.95 (0.87 to 1.04), 1.07 (0.98 to 1.16) and 0.89 (0.81 to 0.98), respectively. Analyses by duration of exposure to CCB did not show excess risk. CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based study provides strong evidence that CCB use is not associated with an increased risk of cancer. The analyses yielded robust results across all types of cancer and different durations of exposure to CCBs. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4716173/ /pubmed/26747033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009147 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Grimaldi-Bensouda, Lamiae
Klungel, Olaf
Kurz, Xavier
de Groot, Mark C H
Maciel Afonso, Ana S
de Bruin, Marie L
Reynolds, Robert
Rossignol, Michel
Calcium channel blockers and cancer: a risk analysis using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)
title Calcium channel blockers and cancer: a risk analysis using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)
title_full Calcium channel blockers and cancer: a risk analysis using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)
title_fullStr Calcium channel blockers and cancer: a risk analysis using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)
title_full_unstemmed Calcium channel blockers and cancer: a risk analysis using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)
title_short Calcium channel blockers and cancer: a risk analysis using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)
title_sort calcium channel blockers and cancer: a risk analysis using the uk clinical practice research datalink (cprd)
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26747033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009147
work_keys_str_mv AT grimaldibensoudalamiae calciumchannelblockersandcancerariskanalysisusingtheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalinkcprd
AT klungelolaf calciumchannelblockersandcancerariskanalysisusingtheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalinkcprd
AT kurzxavier calciumchannelblockersandcancerariskanalysisusingtheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalinkcprd
AT degrootmarkch calciumchannelblockersandcancerariskanalysisusingtheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalinkcprd
AT macielafonsoanas calciumchannelblockersandcancerariskanalysisusingtheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalinkcprd
AT debruinmariel calciumchannelblockersandcancerariskanalysisusingtheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalinkcprd
AT reynoldsrobert calciumchannelblockersandcancerariskanalysisusingtheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalinkcprd
AT rossignolmichel calciumchannelblockersandcancerariskanalysisusingtheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalinkcprd