Cargando…

Outcomes of domestic violence screening at an acute London trust: are there missed opportunities for intervention?

OBJECTIVES: Domestic violence screening is advocated in some healthcare settings. Evidence that it increases referral to support agencies or improves health outcomes is limited. This study aimed to (1) investigate the proportion of hospital patients reporting domestic violence, (2) describe characte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warren-Gash, Charlotte, Bartley, Angela, Bayly, Jude, Dutey-Magni, Peter, Edwards, Sarah, Madge, Sara, Miller, Charlotte, Nicholas, Rachel, Radhakrishnan, Sheila, Sathia, Leena, Swarbrick, Helen, Blaikie, Dee, Rodger, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009069
_version_ 1782410517860581376
author Warren-Gash, Charlotte
Bartley, Angela
Bayly, Jude
Dutey-Magni, Peter
Edwards, Sarah
Madge, Sara
Miller, Charlotte
Nicholas, Rachel
Radhakrishnan, Sheila
Sathia, Leena
Swarbrick, Helen
Blaikie, Dee
Rodger, Alison
author_facet Warren-Gash, Charlotte
Bartley, Angela
Bayly, Jude
Dutey-Magni, Peter
Edwards, Sarah
Madge, Sara
Miller, Charlotte
Nicholas, Rachel
Radhakrishnan, Sheila
Sathia, Leena
Swarbrick, Helen
Blaikie, Dee
Rodger, Alison
author_sort Warren-Gash, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Domestic violence screening is advocated in some healthcare settings. Evidence that it increases referral to support agencies or improves health outcomes is limited. This study aimed to (1) investigate the proportion of hospital patients reporting domestic violence, (2) describe characteristics and previous hospital attendances of affected patients and (3) assess referrals to an in-house domestic violence advisor from Camden Safety Net. DESIGN: A series of observational studies. SETTING: Three outpatient clinics at the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust. PARTICIPANTS: 10 158 patients screened for domestic violence in community gynaecology, genitourinary medicine (GUM) and HIV medicine clinics between 1 October 2013 and 30 June 2014. Also 2253 Camden Safety Net referrals over the same period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Percentage reporting domestic violence by age group gender, ethnicity and clinic. (2) Rates of hospital attendances in the past 3 years for those screening positive and negative. (3) Characteristics, uptake and risk assessment results for hospital in-house domestic violence referrals compared with Camden Safety Net referrals from other sources. RESULTS: Of the 10 158 patients screened, 57.4% were female with a median age of 30 years. Overall, 7.1% reported ever-experiencing domestic violence, ranging from 5.7% in GUM to 29.4% in HIV services. People screening positive for domestic violence had higher rates of previous emergency department attendances (rate ratio (RR) 1.63, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.48), emergency inpatient admissions (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.37 to 3.84) and day-case admissions (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.43) than those screening negative. The 77 hospital referrals to the hospital-based domestic violence advisor during the study period were more likely to be taken up and to be classified as high risk than referrals from elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: Selective screening for domestic violence in high-risk hospital clinic populations has the potential to identify affected patients and promote good uptake of referrals for in-house domestic violence support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4716185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47161852016-01-31 Outcomes of domestic violence screening at an acute London trust: are there missed opportunities for intervention? Warren-Gash, Charlotte Bartley, Angela Bayly, Jude Dutey-Magni, Peter Edwards, Sarah Madge, Sara Miller, Charlotte Nicholas, Rachel Radhakrishnan, Sheila Sathia, Leena Swarbrick, Helen Blaikie, Dee Rodger, Alison BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Domestic violence screening is advocated in some healthcare settings. Evidence that it increases referral to support agencies or improves health outcomes is limited. This study aimed to (1) investigate the proportion of hospital patients reporting domestic violence, (2) describe characteristics and previous hospital attendances of affected patients and (3) assess referrals to an in-house domestic violence advisor from Camden Safety Net. DESIGN: A series of observational studies. SETTING: Three outpatient clinics at the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust. PARTICIPANTS: 10 158 patients screened for domestic violence in community gynaecology, genitourinary medicine (GUM) and HIV medicine clinics between 1 October 2013 and 30 June 2014. Also 2253 Camden Safety Net referrals over the same period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Percentage reporting domestic violence by age group gender, ethnicity and clinic. (2) Rates of hospital attendances in the past 3 years for those screening positive and negative. (3) Characteristics, uptake and risk assessment results for hospital in-house domestic violence referrals compared with Camden Safety Net referrals from other sources. RESULTS: Of the 10 158 patients screened, 57.4% were female with a median age of 30 years. Overall, 7.1% reported ever-experiencing domestic violence, ranging from 5.7% in GUM to 29.4% in HIV services. People screening positive for domestic violence had higher rates of previous emergency department attendances (rate ratio (RR) 1.63, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.48), emergency inpatient admissions (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.37 to 3.84) and day-case admissions (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.43) than those screening negative. The 77 hospital referrals to the hospital-based domestic violence advisor during the study period were more likely to be taken up and to be classified as high risk than referrals from elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: Selective screening for domestic violence in high-risk hospital clinic populations has the potential to identify affected patients and promote good uptake of referrals for in-house domestic violence support. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4716185/ /pubmed/26729380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009069 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Warren-Gash, Charlotte
Bartley, Angela
Bayly, Jude
Dutey-Magni, Peter
Edwards, Sarah
Madge, Sara
Miller, Charlotte
Nicholas, Rachel
Radhakrishnan, Sheila
Sathia, Leena
Swarbrick, Helen
Blaikie, Dee
Rodger, Alison
Outcomes of domestic violence screening at an acute London trust: are there missed opportunities for intervention?
title Outcomes of domestic violence screening at an acute London trust: are there missed opportunities for intervention?
title_full Outcomes of domestic violence screening at an acute London trust: are there missed opportunities for intervention?
title_fullStr Outcomes of domestic violence screening at an acute London trust: are there missed opportunities for intervention?
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of domestic violence screening at an acute London trust: are there missed opportunities for intervention?
title_short Outcomes of domestic violence screening at an acute London trust: are there missed opportunities for intervention?
title_sort outcomes of domestic violence screening at an acute london trust: are there missed opportunities for intervention?
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009069
work_keys_str_mv AT warrengashcharlotte outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT bartleyangela outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT baylyjude outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT duteymagnipeter outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT edwardssarah outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT madgesara outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT millercharlotte outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT nicholasrachel outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT radhakrishnansheila outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT sathialeena outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT swarbrickhelen outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT blaikiedee outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention
AT rodgeralison outcomesofdomesticviolencescreeningatanacutelondontrustaretheremissedopportunitiesforintervention