Cargando…

Comparative study of linear and curvilinear ultrasound probes to assess quadriceps rectus femoris muscle mass in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic respiratory disease

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound measurements of rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RF(CSA)) are clinically useful measurements in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and critically ill patients. Technical considerations as to the type of probe used, which affects image resolution, have limited w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandal, S, Suh, E, Thompson, A, Connolly, B, Ramsay, M, Harding, R, Puthucheary, Z, Moxham, J, Hart, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26835132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000103
_version_ 1782410519011917824
author Mandal, S
Suh, E
Thompson, A
Connolly, B
Ramsay, M
Harding, R
Puthucheary, Z
Moxham, J
Hart, N
author_facet Mandal, S
Suh, E
Thompson, A
Connolly, B
Ramsay, M
Harding, R
Puthucheary, Z
Moxham, J
Hart, N
author_sort Mandal, S
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound measurements of rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RF(CSA)) are clinically useful measurements in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and critically ill patients. Technical considerations as to the type of probe used, which affects image resolution, have limited widespread clinical application. We hypothesised that measurement of RF(CSA) would be similar with linear and curvilinear probes. METHODS: Four studies were performed to compare the use of the curvilinear probe in measuring RF(CSA). Study 1 investigated agreement of RF(CSA) measurements using linear and curvilinear probes in healthy subjects, and in patients with chronic respiratory disease. Study 2 investigated the intra-rater and inter-rater agreement using the curvilinear probe. Study 3 investigated the agreement of RF(CSA) measured from whole and spliced images using the linear probe. Study 4 investigated the applicability of ultrasound in measuring RF(CSA) during the acute and recovery phases of an exacerbation of COPD. RESULTS: Study 1 showed demonstrated no difference in the measurement of RF(CSA) using the curvilinear and linear probes (308±104 mm(2) vs 320±117 mm(2), p=0.80; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)>0.97). Study 2 demonstrated high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of RF(CSA) measurement with ICC>0.95 for both. Study 3 showed that the spliced image from the linear probe was similar to the whole image RF(CSA) (308±103.5 vs 263±147 mm(2), p=0.34; ICC>0.98). Study 4 confirmed the clinical acceptability of using the curvilinear probe during an exacerbation of COPD. There were relationships observed between admission RF(CSA) and body mass index (r=+0.65, p=0.018), and between RF(CSA) at admission and physical activity levels at 4 weeks post-hospital discharge (r=+0.75, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: These studies have demonstrated that clinicians can employ whole and spliced images from the linear probe or use images from the curvilinear probe, to measure RF(CSA). This will extend the clinical applicability of ultrasound in the measurement of muscle mass in all patient groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4716191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47161912016-01-29 Comparative study of linear and curvilinear ultrasound probes to assess quadriceps rectus femoris muscle mass in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic respiratory disease Mandal, S Suh, E Thompson, A Connolly, B Ramsay, M Harding, R Puthucheary, Z Moxham, J Hart, N BMJ Open Respir Res Respiratory Research INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound measurements of rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RF(CSA)) are clinically useful measurements in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and critically ill patients. Technical considerations as to the type of probe used, which affects image resolution, have limited widespread clinical application. We hypothesised that measurement of RF(CSA) would be similar with linear and curvilinear probes. METHODS: Four studies were performed to compare the use of the curvilinear probe in measuring RF(CSA). Study 1 investigated agreement of RF(CSA) measurements using linear and curvilinear probes in healthy subjects, and in patients with chronic respiratory disease. Study 2 investigated the intra-rater and inter-rater agreement using the curvilinear probe. Study 3 investigated the agreement of RF(CSA) measured from whole and spliced images using the linear probe. Study 4 investigated the applicability of ultrasound in measuring RF(CSA) during the acute and recovery phases of an exacerbation of COPD. RESULTS: Study 1 showed demonstrated no difference in the measurement of RF(CSA) using the curvilinear and linear probes (308±104 mm(2) vs 320±117 mm(2), p=0.80; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)>0.97). Study 2 demonstrated high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of RF(CSA) measurement with ICC>0.95 for both. Study 3 showed that the spliced image from the linear probe was similar to the whole image RF(CSA) (308±103.5 vs 263±147 mm(2), p=0.34; ICC>0.98). Study 4 confirmed the clinical acceptability of using the curvilinear probe during an exacerbation of COPD. There were relationships observed between admission RF(CSA) and body mass index (r=+0.65, p=0.018), and between RF(CSA) at admission and physical activity levels at 4 weeks post-hospital discharge (r=+0.75, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: These studies have demonstrated that clinicians can employ whole and spliced images from the linear probe or use images from the curvilinear probe, to measure RF(CSA). This will extend the clinical applicability of ultrasound in the measurement of muscle mass in all patient groups. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4716191/ /pubmed/26835132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000103 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Respiratory Research
Mandal, S
Suh, E
Thompson, A
Connolly, B
Ramsay, M
Harding, R
Puthucheary, Z
Moxham, J
Hart, N
Comparative study of linear and curvilinear ultrasound probes to assess quadriceps rectus femoris muscle mass in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic respiratory disease
title Comparative study of linear and curvilinear ultrasound probes to assess quadriceps rectus femoris muscle mass in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic respiratory disease
title_full Comparative study of linear and curvilinear ultrasound probes to assess quadriceps rectus femoris muscle mass in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic respiratory disease
title_fullStr Comparative study of linear and curvilinear ultrasound probes to assess quadriceps rectus femoris muscle mass in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic respiratory disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of linear and curvilinear ultrasound probes to assess quadriceps rectus femoris muscle mass in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic respiratory disease
title_short Comparative study of linear and curvilinear ultrasound probes to assess quadriceps rectus femoris muscle mass in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic respiratory disease
title_sort comparative study of linear and curvilinear ultrasound probes to assess quadriceps rectus femoris muscle mass in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic respiratory disease
topic Respiratory Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26835132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000103
work_keys_str_mv AT mandals comparativestudyoflinearandcurvilinearultrasoundprobestoassessquadricepsrectusfemorismusclemassinhealthysubjectsandinpatientswithchronicrespiratorydisease
AT suhe comparativestudyoflinearandcurvilinearultrasoundprobestoassessquadricepsrectusfemorismusclemassinhealthysubjectsandinpatientswithchronicrespiratorydisease
AT thompsona comparativestudyoflinearandcurvilinearultrasoundprobestoassessquadricepsrectusfemorismusclemassinhealthysubjectsandinpatientswithchronicrespiratorydisease
AT connollyb comparativestudyoflinearandcurvilinearultrasoundprobestoassessquadricepsrectusfemorismusclemassinhealthysubjectsandinpatientswithchronicrespiratorydisease
AT ramsaym comparativestudyoflinearandcurvilinearultrasoundprobestoassessquadricepsrectusfemorismusclemassinhealthysubjectsandinpatientswithchronicrespiratorydisease
AT hardingr comparativestudyoflinearandcurvilinearultrasoundprobestoassessquadricepsrectusfemorismusclemassinhealthysubjectsandinpatientswithchronicrespiratorydisease
AT puthuchearyz comparativestudyoflinearandcurvilinearultrasoundprobestoassessquadricepsrectusfemorismusclemassinhealthysubjectsandinpatientswithchronicrespiratorydisease
AT moxhamj comparativestudyoflinearandcurvilinearultrasoundprobestoassessquadricepsrectusfemorismusclemassinhealthysubjectsandinpatientswithchronicrespiratorydisease
AT hartn comparativestudyoflinearandcurvilinearultrasoundprobestoassessquadricepsrectusfemorismusclemassinhealthysubjectsandinpatientswithchronicrespiratorydisease