Cargando…
Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common neoplasm in adult kidneys. One of the most important unmet medical needs in RCC is a prognostic biomarker to enable identification of patients at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy. New biomarkers can help improve diagnosis and hence th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009667 |
_version_ | 1782410521732972544 |
---|---|
author | Rasti, Arezoo Mehrazma, Mitra Madjd, Zahra Keshtkar, Abbas Ali Roudi, Raheleh Babashah, Sadegh |
author_facet | Rasti, Arezoo Mehrazma, Mitra Madjd, Zahra Keshtkar, Abbas Ali Roudi, Raheleh Babashah, Sadegh |
author_sort | Rasti, Arezoo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common neoplasm in adult kidneys. One of the most important unmet medical needs in RCC is a prognostic biomarker to enable identification of patients at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy. New biomarkers can help improve diagnosis and hence the management of patients with renal cancer. Thus, this systematic review aims to clarify the prognostic and diagnostic accuracy of miR-21 in patients with RCC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include observational studies evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic roles of miR-21 in patients with renal cancer. The index test and reference standards should ideally be performed on all patients. We will search PubMed, SCOPUS and ISI Web of Science with no restriction of language. The outcome will be survival measures in adult patients with RCC. Study selection and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. QUADAS-1 will be used to assess study quality. Publication bias and data synthesis will be assessed by funnel plots and Begg's and Egger's tests using Stata software V.11.1. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are predicted. These findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This systematic review protocol is registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, registration number CRD42015025001. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4716203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47162032016-01-31 Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol Rasti, Arezoo Mehrazma, Mitra Madjd, Zahra Keshtkar, Abbas Ali Roudi, Raheleh Babashah, Sadegh BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common neoplasm in adult kidneys. One of the most important unmet medical needs in RCC is a prognostic biomarker to enable identification of patients at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy. New biomarkers can help improve diagnosis and hence the management of patients with renal cancer. Thus, this systematic review aims to clarify the prognostic and diagnostic accuracy of miR-21 in patients with RCC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include observational studies evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic roles of miR-21 in patients with renal cancer. The index test and reference standards should ideally be performed on all patients. We will search PubMed, SCOPUS and ISI Web of Science with no restriction of language. The outcome will be survival measures in adult patients with RCC. Study selection and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. QUADAS-1 will be used to assess study quality. Publication bias and data synthesis will be assessed by funnel plots and Begg's and Egger's tests using Stata software V.11.1. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are predicted. These findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This systematic review protocol is registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, registration number CRD42015025001. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4716203/ /pubmed/26729387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009667 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Oncology Rasti, Arezoo Mehrazma, Mitra Madjd, Zahra Keshtkar, Abbas Ali Roudi, Raheleh Babashah, Sadegh Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol |
title | Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol |
title_full | Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol |
title_short | Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol |
title_sort | diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of mir-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009667 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rastiarezoo diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol AT mehrazmamitra diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol AT madjdzahra diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol AT keshtkarabbasali diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol AT roudiraheleh diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol AT babashahsadegh diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol |