Cargando…

Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common neoplasm in adult kidneys. One of the most important unmet medical needs in RCC is a prognostic biomarker to enable identification of patients at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy. New biomarkers can help improve diagnosis and hence th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasti, Arezoo, Mehrazma, Mitra, Madjd, Zahra, Keshtkar, Abbas Ali, Roudi, Raheleh, Babashah, Sadegh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009667
_version_ 1782410521732972544
author Rasti, Arezoo
Mehrazma, Mitra
Madjd, Zahra
Keshtkar, Abbas Ali
Roudi, Raheleh
Babashah, Sadegh
author_facet Rasti, Arezoo
Mehrazma, Mitra
Madjd, Zahra
Keshtkar, Abbas Ali
Roudi, Raheleh
Babashah, Sadegh
author_sort Rasti, Arezoo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common neoplasm in adult kidneys. One of the most important unmet medical needs in RCC is a prognostic biomarker to enable identification of patients at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy. New biomarkers can help improve diagnosis and hence the management of patients with renal cancer. Thus, this systematic review aims to clarify the prognostic and diagnostic accuracy of miR-21 in patients with RCC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include observational studies evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic roles of miR-21 in patients with renal cancer. The index test and reference standards should ideally be performed on all patients. We will search PubMed, SCOPUS and ISI Web of Science with no restriction of language. The outcome will be survival measures in adult patients with RCC. Study selection and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. QUADAS-1 will be used to assess study quality. Publication bias and data synthesis will be assessed by funnel plots and Begg's and Egger's tests using Stata software V.11.1. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are predicted. These findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This systematic review protocol is registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, registration number CRD42015025001.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4716203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47162032016-01-31 Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol Rasti, Arezoo Mehrazma, Mitra Madjd, Zahra Keshtkar, Abbas Ali Roudi, Raheleh Babashah, Sadegh BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common neoplasm in adult kidneys. One of the most important unmet medical needs in RCC is a prognostic biomarker to enable identification of patients at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy. New biomarkers can help improve diagnosis and hence the management of patients with renal cancer. Thus, this systematic review aims to clarify the prognostic and diagnostic accuracy of miR-21 in patients with RCC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include observational studies evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic roles of miR-21 in patients with renal cancer. The index test and reference standards should ideally be performed on all patients. We will search PubMed, SCOPUS and ISI Web of Science with no restriction of language. The outcome will be survival measures in adult patients with RCC. Study selection and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. QUADAS-1 will be used to assess study quality. Publication bias and data synthesis will be assessed by funnel plots and Begg's and Egger's tests using Stata software V.11.1. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are predicted. These findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This systematic review protocol is registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, registration number CRD42015025001. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4716203/ /pubmed/26729387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009667 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Rasti, Arezoo
Mehrazma, Mitra
Madjd, Zahra
Keshtkar, Abbas Ali
Roudi, Raheleh
Babashah, Sadegh
Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol
title Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol
title_full Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol
title_short Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of miR-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol
title_sort diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of mir-21 in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009667
work_keys_str_mv AT rastiarezoo diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT mehrazmamitra diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT madjdzahra diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT keshtkarabbasali diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT roudiraheleh diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT babashahsadegh diagnosticandprognosticaccuracyofmir21inrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewprotocol