Cargando…

Is referral of postsurgical colorectal cancer survivors to cardiac rehabilitation feasible and acceptable? A pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: (1) Assess whether cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a feasible and acceptable model of rehabilitation for postsurgical colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors, (2) evaluate trial procedures. This article reports the results of the first objective. DESIGN AND SETTING: A pragmatic pilot randomised...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hubbard, Gill, Adams, Richard, Campbell, Anna, Kidd, Lisa, Leslie, Stephen J, Munro, Julie, Watson, Angus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009284
_version_ 1782410524256894976
author Hubbard, Gill
Adams, Richard
Campbell, Anna
Kidd, Lisa
Leslie, Stephen J
Munro, Julie
Watson, Angus
author_facet Hubbard, Gill
Adams, Richard
Campbell, Anna
Kidd, Lisa
Leslie, Stephen J
Munro, Julie
Watson, Angus
author_sort Hubbard, Gill
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: (1) Assess whether cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a feasible and acceptable model of rehabilitation for postsurgical colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors, (2) evaluate trial procedures. This article reports the results of the first objective. DESIGN AND SETTING: A pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study was conducted in 3 UK hospitals with CR facilities. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise trial parameters indicative of intervention feasibility and acceptability. Interviews and focus groups were conducted and data analysed thematically. PARTICIPANTS: People with CRC were considered for inclusion in the trial if they were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with primary CRC and in the recovery period postsurgery (they could still be receiving adjuvant therapy). 31% (n=41) of all eligible CRC survivors consented to participate in the trial. 22 of these CRC survivors, and 8 people with cardiovascular disease (CVD), 5 CRC nurses and 6 CR clinicians participated in the qualitative study. INTERVENTION: Referral of postsurgical CRC survivors to weekly CR exercise classes and information sessions. Classes included CRC survivors and people with CVD. CR nurses and physiotherapists were given training about cancer and exercise. RESULTS: Barriers to CR were protracted recoveries from surgery, ongoing treatments and poor mobility. No adverse events were reported during the trial, suggesting that CR is safe. 62% of participants completed the intervention as per protocol and had high levels of attendance. 20 health professionals attended the cancer and exercise training course, rating it as excellent. Participants perceived that CR increased CRC survivors’ confidence and motivation to exercise, and offered peer support. CR professionals were concerned about CR capacity to accommodate cancer survivors and their ability to provide psychosocial support to this group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: CR is feasible and acceptable for postsurgical CRC survivors. A large-scale effectiveness trial of the intervention should be conducted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN63510637.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4716214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47162142016-01-31 Is referral of postsurgical colorectal cancer survivors to cardiac rehabilitation feasible and acceptable? A pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study Hubbard, Gill Adams, Richard Campbell, Anna Kidd, Lisa Leslie, Stephen J Munro, Julie Watson, Angus BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: (1) Assess whether cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a feasible and acceptable model of rehabilitation for postsurgical colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors, (2) evaluate trial procedures. This article reports the results of the first objective. DESIGN AND SETTING: A pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study was conducted in 3 UK hospitals with CR facilities. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise trial parameters indicative of intervention feasibility and acceptability. Interviews and focus groups were conducted and data analysed thematically. PARTICIPANTS: People with CRC were considered for inclusion in the trial if they were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with primary CRC and in the recovery period postsurgery (they could still be receiving adjuvant therapy). 31% (n=41) of all eligible CRC survivors consented to participate in the trial. 22 of these CRC survivors, and 8 people with cardiovascular disease (CVD), 5 CRC nurses and 6 CR clinicians participated in the qualitative study. INTERVENTION: Referral of postsurgical CRC survivors to weekly CR exercise classes and information sessions. Classes included CRC survivors and people with CVD. CR nurses and physiotherapists were given training about cancer and exercise. RESULTS: Barriers to CR were protracted recoveries from surgery, ongoing treatments and poor mobility. No adverse events were reported during the trial, suggesting that CR is safe. 62% of participants completed the intervention as per protocol and had high levels of attendance. 20 health professionals attended the cancer and exercise training course, rating it as excellent. Participants perceived that CR increased CRC survivors’ confidence and motivation to exercise, and offered peer support. CR professionals were concerned about CR capacity to accommodate cancer survivors and their ability to provide psychosocial support to this group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: CR is feasible and acceptable for postsurgical CRC survivors. A large-scale effectiveness trial of the intervention should be conducted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN63510637. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4716214/ /pubmed/26729381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009284 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Hubbard, Gill
Adams, Richard
Campbell, Anna
Kidd, Lisa
Leslie, Stephen J
Munro, Julie
Watson, Angus
Is referral of postsurgical colorectal cancer survivors to cardiac rehabilitation feasible and acceptable? A pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study
title Is referral of postsurgical colorectal cancer survivors to cardiac rehabilitation feasible and acceptable? A pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study
title_full Is referral of postsurgical colorectal cancer survivors to cardiac rehabilitation feasible and acceptable? A pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study
title_fullStr Is referral of postsurgical colorectal cancer survivors to cardiac rehabilitation feasible and acceptable? A pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Is referral of postsurgical colorectal cancer survivors to cardiac rehabilitation feasible and acceptable? A pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study
title_short Is referral of postsurgical colorectal cancer survivors to cardiac rehabilitation feasible and acceptable? A pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study
title_sort is referral of postsurgical colorectal cancer survivors to cardiac rehabilitation feasible and acceptable? a pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009284
work_keys_str_mv AT hubbardgill isreferralofpostsurgicalcolorectalcancersurvivorstocardiacrehabilitationfeasibleandacceptableapragmaticpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialwithembeddedqualitativestudy
AT adamsrichard isreferralofpostsurgicalcolorectalcancersurvivorstocardiacrehabilitationfeasibleandacceptableapragmaticpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialwithembeddedqualitativestudy
AT campbellanna isreferralofpostsurgicalcolorectalcancersurvivorstocardiacrehabilitationfeasibleandacceptableapragmaticpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialwithembeddedqualitativestudy
AT kiddlisa isreferralofpostsurgicalcolorectalcancersurvivorstocardiacrehabilitationfeasibleandacceptableapragmaticpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialwithembeddedqualitativestudy
AT lesliestephenj isreferralofpostsurgicalcolorectalcancersurvivorstocardiacrehabilitationfeasibleandacceptableapragmaticpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialwithembeddedqualitativestudy
AT munrojulie isreferralofpostsurgicalcolorectalcancersurvivorstocardiacrehabilitationfeasibleandacceptableapragmaticpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialwithembeddedqualitativestudy
AT watsonangus isreferralofpostsurgicalcolorectalcancersurvivorstocardiacrehabilitationfeasibleandacceptableapragmaticpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialwithembeddedqualitativestudy