Cargando…

Non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in Norway

OBJECTIVES: Declining participation in epidemiological studies has been reported in recent decades and may lead to biased prevalence estimates and selection bias. The aim of the study was to identify possible causes and effects of non-response in a population-based study of respiratory health in Nor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abrahamsen, Regine, Svendsen, Martin Veel, Henneberger, Paul K, Gundersen, Gølin Finckenhagen, Torén, Kjell, Kongerud, Johny, Fell, Anne Kristin Møller
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26739738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009912
_version_ 1782410527434080256
author Abrahamsen, Regine
Svendsen, Martin Veel
Henneberger, Paul K
Gundersen, Gølin Finckenhagen
Torén, Kjell
Kongerud, Johny
Fell, Anne Kristin Møller
author_facet Abrahamsen, Regine
Svendsen, Martin Veel
Henneberger, Paul K
Gundersen, Gølin Finckenhagen
Torén, Kjell
Kongerud, Johny
Fell, Anne Kristin Møller
author_sort Abrahamsen, Regine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Declining participation in epidemiological studies has been reported in recent decades and may lead to biased prevalence estimates and selection bias. The aim of the study was to identify possible causes and effects of non-response in a population-based study of respiratory health in Norway. DESIGN: The Telemark study is a longitudinal study that began with a cross-sectional survey in 2013. SETTING: In 2013, a random sample of 50 000 inhabitants aged 16–50 years, living in Telemark county, received a validated postal questionnaire. The response rate was 33%. In this study, a random sample of 700 non-responders was contacted first by telephone and then by mail. OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rates, prevalence and OR of asthma and respiratory symptoms based on exposure to vapours, gas, dust or fumes (VGDF) and smoking. Causes of non-response. RESULTS: A total of 260 non-responders (37%) participated. Non-response was associated with younger age, male sex, living in a rural area and past smoking. The prevalence was similar for responders and non-responders for physician-diagnosed asthma and several respiratory symptoms. The prevalence of chronic cough and use of asthma medication was overestimated in the Telemark study, and adjusted prevalence estimates were 17.4% and 5%, respectively. Current smoking was identified as a risk factor for respiratory symptoms among responders and non-responders, while occupational VGDF exposure was a risk factor only among responders. The Breslow-Day test detected heterogeneity between productive cough and occupational VGDF exposure among responders. CONCLUSIONS: The Telemark study provided valid estimates for physician-diagnosed asthma and several respiratory symptoms, while it was necessary to adjust prevalence estimates for chronic cough and use of asthma medication. Reminder letters had little effect on risk factor associations. Selection bias should be considered in future investigations of the relationship between respiratory outcomes and exposures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4716229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47162292016-01-31 Non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in Norway Abrahamsen, Regine Svendsen, Martin Veel Henneberger, Paul K Gundersen, Gølin Finckenhagen Torén, Kjell Kongerud, Johny Fell, Anne Kristin Møller BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: Declining participation in epidemiological studies has been reported in recent decades and may lead to biased prevalence estimates and selection bias. The aim of the study was to identify possible causes and effects of non-response in a population-based study of respiratory health in Norway. DESIGN: The Telemark study is a longitudinal study that began with a cross-sectional survey in 2013. SETTING: In 2013, a random sample of 50 000 inhabitants aged 16–50 years, living in Telemark county, received a validated postal questionnaire. The response rate was 33%. In this study, a random sample of 700 non-responders was contacted first by telephone and then by mail. OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rates, prevalence and OR of asthma and respiratory symptoms based on exposure to vapours, gas, dust or fumes (VGDF) and smoking. Causes of non-response. RESULTS: A total of 260 non-responders (37%) participated. Non-response was associated with younger age, male sex, living in a rural area and past smoking. The prevalence was similar for responders and non-responders for physician-diagnosed asthma and several respiratory symptoms. The prevalence of chronic cough and use of asthma medication was overestimated in the Telemark study, and adjusted prevalence estimates were 17.4% and 5%, respectively. Current smoking was identified as a risk factor for respiratory symptoms among responders and non-responders, while occupational VGDF exposure was a risk factor only among responders. The Breslow-Day test detected heterogeneity between productive cough and occupational VGDF exposure among responders. CONCLUSIONS: The Telemark study provided valid estimates for physician-diagnosed asthma and several respiratory symptoms, while it was necessary to adjust prevalence estimates for chronic cough and use of asthma medication. Reminder letters had little effect on risk factor associations. Selection bias should be considered in future investigations of the relationship between respiratory outcomes and exposures. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4716229/ /pubmed/26739738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009912 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Abrahamsen, Regine
Svendsen, Martin Veel
Henneberger, Paul K
Gundersen, Gølin Finckenhagen
Torén, Kjell
Kongerud, Johny
Fell, Anne Kristin Møller
Non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in Norway
title Non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in Norway
title_full Non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in Norway
title_fullStr Non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in Norway
title_short Non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in Norway
title_sort non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in norway
topic Occupational and Environmental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26739738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009912
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamsenregine nonresponseinacrosssectionalstudyofrespiratoryhealthinnorway
AT svendsenmartinveel nonresponseinacrosssectionalstudyofrespiratoryhealthinnorway
AT hennebergerpaulk nonresponseinacrosssectionalstudyofrespiratoryhealthinnorway
AT gundersengølinfinckenhagen nonresponseinacrosssectionalstudyofrespiratoryhealthinnorway
AT torenkjell nonresponseinacrosssectionalstudyofrespiratoryhealthinnorway
AT kongerudjohny nonresponseinacrosssectionalstudyofrespiratoryhealthinnorway
AT fellannekristinmøller nonresponseinacrosssectionalstudyofrespiratoryhealthinnorway