Cargando…

Progression of breast cancer following locoregional ipsilateral recurrence: importance of interval time

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing prognosis of breast cancer (BC) patients with and without locoregional recurrence (LR) present conflicting results. We aimed to improve our understanding of the impact of LR on prognosis by examining a large cohort of patients treated at Guy's and St Thomas' N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melvin, Jennifer C, Purushotham, Arnie D, Garmo, Hans, Pinder, Sarah E, Fentiman, Ian S, Gillett, Cheryl, Mera, Anca, Lüctehnborg, Margreet, Holmberg, Lars, Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26657655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.314
_version_ 1782410553028771840
author Melvin, Jennifer C
Purushotham, Arnie D
Garmo, Hans
Pinder, Sarah E
Fentiman, Ian S
Gillett, Cheryl
Mera, Anca
Lüctehnborg, Margreet
Holmberg, Lars
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
author_facet Melvin, Jennifer C
Purushotham, Arnie D
Garmo, Hans
Pinder, Sarah E
Fentiman, Ian S
Gillett, Cheryl
Mera, Anca
Lüctehnborg, Margreet
Holmberg, Lars
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
author_sort Melvin, Jennifer C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies comparing prognosis of breast cancer (BC) patients with and without locoregional recurrence (LR) present conflicting results. We aimed to improve our understanding of the impact of LR on prognosis by examining a large cohort of patients treated at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. METHODS: Risk factors associated with BC-specific death were investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression in 5199 women diagnosed between 1975 and 2007. Breast cancer-specific death following LR was assessed with Poisson regression. RESULTS: Overall, 552 women (11%) developed LR, with a median follow-up time of 4.28 years. Known factors associated with BC-specific death (tumour stage, grade, and nodal status) were of significance in our data. Women with a shorter disease-free interval had a worse prognosis. For instance, the HR for BC-specific death among women undergoing mastectomy with an LR 0.5–1 year after diagnosis of their primary tumour was 6.67 (95% CI: 3.71–11.99), when compared with women who did not experience LR. CONCLUSIONS: It often remains difficult to distinguish between a genuine LR and a new primary. The HRs for risk of BC-specific death following a second lesion suggest that they may act as a marker of systemic disease, large tumour burden, or depleted host defence. The clinically highly relevant impairment in prognosis calls for further research into the underlying mechanisms. We showed that for at least 15 years of follow-up, the prognosis in women following the occurrence of an LR may benefit from careful diagnostic and therapeutic management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4716532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47165322017-01-12 Progression of breast cancer following locoregional ipsilateral recurrence: importance of interval time Melvin, Jennifer C Purushotham, Arnie D Garmo, Hans Pinder, Sarah E Fentiman, Ian S Gillett, Cheryl Mera, Anca Lüctehnborg, Margreet Holmberg, Lars Van Hemelrijck, Mieke Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Studies comparing prognosis of breast cancer (BC) patients with and without locoregional recurrence (LR) present conflicting results. We aimed to improve our understanding of the impact of LR on prognosis by examining a large cohort of patients treated at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. METHODS: Risk factors associated with BC-specific death were investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression in 5199 women diagnosed between 1975 and 2007. Breast cancer-specific death following LR was assessed with Poisson regression. RESULTS: Overall, 552 women (11%) developed LR, with a median follow-up time of 4.28 years. Known factors associated with BC-specific death (tumour stage, grade, and nodal status) were of significance in our data. Women with a shorter disease-free interval had a worse prognosis. For instance, the HR for BC-specific death among women undergoing mastectomy with an LR 0.5–1 year after diagnosis of their primary tumour was 6.67 (95% CI: 3.71–11.99), when compared with women who did not experience LR. CONCLUSIONS: It often remains difficult to distinguish between a genuine LR and a new primary. The HRs for risk of BC-specific death following a second lesion suggest that they may act as a marker of systemic disease, large tumour burden, or depleted host defence. The clinically highly relevant impairment in prognosis calls for further research into the underlying mechanisms. We showed that for at least 15 years of follow-up, the prognosis in women following the occurrence of an LR may benefit from careful diagnostic and therapeutic management. Nature Publishing Group 2016-01-12 2015-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4716532/ /pubmed/26657655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.314 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Melvin, Jennifer C
Purushotham, Arnie D
Garmo, Hans
Pinder, Sarah E
Fentiman, Ian S
Gillett, Cheryl
Mera, Anca
Lüctehnborg, Margreet
Holmberg, Lars
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Progression of breast cancer following locoregional ipsilateral recurrence: importance of interval time
title Progression of breast cancer following locoregional ipsilateral recurrence: importance of interval time
title_full Progression of breast cancer following locoregional ipsilateral recurrence: importance of interval time
title_fullStr Progression of breast cancer following locoregional ipsilateral recurrence: importance of interval time
title_full_unstemmed Progression of breast cancer following locoregional ipsilateral recurrence: importance of interval time
title_short Progression of breast cancer following locoregional ipsilateral recurrence: importance of interval time
title_sort progression of breast cancer following locoregional ipsilateral recurrence: importance of interval time
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26657655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.314
work_keys_str_mv AT melvinjenniferc progressionofbreastcancerfollowinglocoregionalipsilateralrecurrenceimportanceofintervaltime
AT purushothamarnied progressionofbreastcancerfollowinglocoregionalipsilateralrecurrenceimportanceofintervaltime
AT garmohans progressionofbreastcancerfollowinglocoregionalipsilateralrecurrenceimportanceofintervaltime
AT pindersarahe progressionofbreastcancerfollowinglocoregionalipsilateralrecurrenceimportanceofintervaltime
AT fentimanians progressionofbreastcancerfollowinglocoregionalipsilateralrecurrenceimportanceofintervaltime
AT gillettcheryl progressionofbreastcancerfollowinglocoregionalipsilateralrecurrenceimportanceofintervaltime
AT meraanca progressionofbreastcancerfollowinglocoregionalipsilateralrecurrenceimportanceofintervaltime
AT luctehnborgmargreet progressionofbreastcancerfollowinglocoregionalipsilateralrecurrenceimportanceofintervaltime
AT holmberglars progressionofbreastcancerfollowinglocoregionalipsilateralrecurrenceimportanceofintervaltime
AT vanhemelrijckmieke progressionofbreastcancerfollowinglocoregionalipsilateralrecurrenceimportanceofintervaltime