Cargando…

Efficacious and safe orotracheal intubation for laboratory mice using slim torqueable guidewire-based technique: comparisons between a modified and a conventional method

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation of laboratory mice remains essential yet challenging for most researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this procedure can be more efficiently and safely accomplished by a novel method using slim and torqueable guidewires to guide access to the tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Chieh-Shou, Lai, Hui-Chin, Wang, Chih-Yen, Lee, Wen-Lieng, Wang, Kuo-Yang, Yang, Ya-Ling, Wang, Li-Chun, Liu, Chia-Ning, Liu, Tsun-Jui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26776367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0173-6
_version_ 1782410563903553536
author Su, Chieh-Shou
Lai, Hui-Chin
Wang, Chih-Yen
Lee, Wen-Lieng
Wang, Kuo-Yang
Yang, Ya-Ling
Wang, Li-Chun
Liu, Chia-Ning
Liu, Tsun-Jui
author_facet Su, Chieh-Shou
Lai, Hui-Chin
Wang, Chih-Yen
Lee, Wen-Lieng
Wang, Kuo-Yang
Yang, Ya-Ling
Wang, Li-Chun
Liu, Chia-Ning
Liu, Tsun-Jui
author_sort Su, Chieh-Shou
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation of laboratory mice remains essential yet challenging for most researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this procedure can be more efficiently and safely accomplished by a novel method using slim and torqueable guidewires to guide access to the trachea. METHODS: This study was carried out in an animal laboratory affiliated to a tertiary medical center. Mice weighing 22 to 28 g were subjected to various open-chest experiments after being anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine (100 mg/kg) and lidocaine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg). The oropharyngeal cavity was opened with angled tissue forceps, and the trachea was transilluminated using an external light. The vocal cords were then crossed using either the Conventional method with a 38-mm-long, end-blunted stiff needle as a guide for insertion of a 22-gauge, 25-mm-long intravenous catheter into the trachea, or the Modified method utilizing using a 0.014-inch-thin torqueable wire as the guide to introduce an identical tube over it into the trachea. The epithelial integrity of the trachea was later examined histologically when the animals were sacrificed either immediately after the surgery or at 28 days post-surgery, depending on the corresponding research protocols. RESULTS: Orotracheal intubation was successfully completed in all mice using either the Conventional (N = 42) or the Modified method (N = 50). With the Modified method, intubation took less time (1.73 vs. 2.17 min, Modified vs. Conventional, p < 0.001) and fewer attempts (1.0 vs. 1.33, p < 0.001), and there were fewer procedural difficulties (0 % vs. 16.7 %, p = 0.009) and complications (0 % vs. 11.9 %, p = 0.041) compared with the Conventional method. Histological analysis revealed a significantly lower incidence of immediate (0 % vs. 39 %, p < 0.001) and late (0 % vs. 58 %, p < 0.001) injuries to the tracheal epithelial lining with the Modified method compared to the Conventional method. CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal intubation for laboratory mice can be completed efficiently, safely and atraumatically using the proposed Modified method employing readily available inexpensive instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4716634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47166342016-01-19 Efficacious and safe orotracheal intubation for laboratory mice using slim torqueable guidewire-based technique: comparisons between a modified and a conventional method Su, Chieh-Shou Lai, Hui-Chin Wang, Chih-Yen Lee, Wen-Lieng Wang, Kuo-Yang Yang, Ya-Ling Wang, Li-Chun Liu, Chia-Ning Liu, Tsun-Jui BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation of laboratory mice remains essential yet challenging for most researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this procedure can be more efficiently and safely accomplished by a novel method using slim and torqueable guidewires to guide access to the trachea. METHODS: This study was carried out in an animal laboratory affiliated to a tertiary medical center. Mice weighing 22 to 28 g were subjected to various open-chest experiments after being anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine (100 mg/kg) and lidocaine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg). The oropharyngeal cavity was opened with angled tissue forceps, and the trachea was transilluminated using an external light. The vocal cords were then crossed using either the Conventional method with a 38-mm-long, end-blunted stiff needle as a guide for insertion of a 22-gauge, 25-mm-long intravenous catheter into the trachea, or the Modified method utilizing using a 0.014-inch-thin torqueable wire as the guide to introduce an identical tube over it into the trachea. The epithelial integrity of the trachea was later examined histologically when the animals were sacrificed either immediately after the surgery or at 28 days post-surgery, depending on the corresponding research protocols. RESULTS: Orotracheal intubation was successfully completed in all mice using either the Conventional (N = 42) or the Modified method (N = 50). With the Modified method, intubation took less time (1.73 vs. 2.17 min, Modified vs. Conventional, p < 0.001) and fewer attempts (1.0 vs. 1.33, p < 0.001), and there were fewer procedural difficulties (0 % vs. 16.7 %, p = 0.009) and complications (0 % vs. 11.9 %, p = 0.041) compared with the Conventional method. Histological analysis revealed a significantly lower incidence of immediate (0 % vs. 39 %, p < 0.001) and late (0 % vs. 58 %, p < 0.001) injuries to the tracheal epithelial lining with the Modified method compared to the Conventional method. CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal intubation for laboratory mice can be completed efficiently, safely and atraumatically using the proposed Modified method employing readily available inexpensive instruments. BioMed Central 2016-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4716634/ /pubmed/26776367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0173-6 Text en © Su et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Su, Chieh-Shou
Lai, Hui-Chin
Wang, Chih-Yen
Lee, Wen-Lieng
Wang, Kuo-Yang
Yang, Ya-Ling
Wang, Li-Chun
Liu, Chia-Ning
Liu, Tsun-Jui
Efficacious and safe orotracheal intubation for laboratory mice using slim torqueable guidewire-based technique: comparisons between a modified and a conventional method
title Efficacious and safe orotracheal intubation for laboratory mice using slim torqueable guidewire-based technique: comparisons between a modified and a conventional method
title_full Efficacious and safe orotracheal intubation for laboratory mice using slim torqueable guidewire-based technique: comparisons between a modified and a conventional method
title_fullStr Efficacious and safe orotracheal intubation for laboratory mice using slim torqueable guidewire-based technique: comparisons between a modified and a conventional method
title_full_unstemmed Efficacious and safe orotracheal intubation for laboratory mice using slim torqueable guidewire-based technique: comparisons between a modified and a conventional method
title_short Efficacious and safe orotracheal intubation for laboratory mice using slim torqueable guidewire-based technique: comparisons between a modified and a conventional method
title_sort efficacious and safe orotracheal intubation for laboratory mice using slim torqueable guidewire-based technique: comparisons between a modified and a conventional method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26776367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0173-6
work_keys_str_mv AT suchiehshou efficaciousandsafeorotrachealintubationforlaboratorymiceusingslimtorqueableguidewirebasedtechniquecomparisonsbetweenamodifiedandaconventionalmethod
AT laihuichin efficaciousandsafeorotrachealintubationforlaboratorymiceusingslimtorqueableguidewirebasedtechniquecomparisonsbetweenamodifiedandaconventionalmethod
AT wangchihyen efficaciousandsafeorotrachealintubationforlaboratorymiceusingslimtorqueableguidewirebasedtechniquecomparisonsbetweenamodifiedandaconventionalmethod
AT leewenlieng efficaciousandsafeorotrachealintubationforlaboratorymiceusingslimtorqueableguidewirebasedtechniquecomparisonsbetweenamodifiedandaconventionalmethod
AT wangkuoyang efficaciousandsafeorotrachealintubationforlaboratorymiceusingslimtorqueableguidewirebasedtechniquecomparisonsbetweenamodifiedandaconventionalmethod
AT yangyaling efficaciousandsafeorotrachealintubationforlaboratorymiceusingslimtorqueableguidewirebasedtechniquecomparisonsbetweenamodifiedandaconventionalmethod
AT wanglichun efficaciousandsafeorotrachealintubationforlaboratorymiceusingslimtorqueableguidewirebasedtechniquecomparisonsbetweenamodifiedandaconventionalmethod
AT liuchianing efficaciousandsafeorotrachealintubationforlaboratorymiceusingslimtorqueableguidewirebasedtechniquecomparisonsbetweenamodifiedandaconventionalmethod
AT liutsunjui efficaciousandsafeorotrachealintubationforlaboratorymiceusingslimtorqueableguidewirebasedtechniquecomparisonsbetweenamodifiedandaconventionalmethod