Cargando…

When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering?

Stressors and heterogeneity are ubiquitous features of natural environments, and theory suggests that when environmental qualities alter flowering schedules through phenotypic plasticity, assortative mating can result that promotes evolutionary divergence. Therefore, it is important to determine whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jordan, Crispin Y., Ally, Dilara, Hodgins, Kathryn A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1821
_version_ 1782410636333940736
author Jordan, Crispin Y.
Ally, Dilara
Hodgins, Kathryn A.
author_facet Jordan, Crispin Y.
Ally, Dilara
Hodgins, Kathryn A.
author_sort Jordan, Crispin Y.
collection PubMed
description Stressors and heterogeneity are ubiquitous features of natural environments, and theory suggests that when environmental qualities alter flowering schedules through phenotypic plasticity, assortative mating can result that promotes evolutionary divergence. Therefore, it is important to determine whether common ecological stressors induce similar changes in flowering time. We review previous studies to determine whether two important stressors, water restriction and herbivory, induce consistent flowering time responses among species; for example, how often do water restriction and herbivory both delay flowering? We focus on the direction of change in flowering time, which affects the potential for divergence in heterogeneous environments. We also tested whether these stressors influenced time to flowering and nonphenology traits using Mimulus guttatus. The literature review suggests that water restriction has variable effects on flowering time, whereas herbivory delays flowering with exceptional consistency. In the Mimulus experiment, low water and herbivory advanced and delayed flowering, respectively. Overall, our results temper theoretical predictions for evolutionary divergence due to habitat‐induced changes in flowering time; in particular, we discuss how accounting for variation in the direction of change in flowering time can either increase or decrease the potential for divergence. In addition, we caution against adaptive interpretations of stress‐induced phenology shifts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4717339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47173392016-01-25 When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering? Jordan, Crispin Y. Ally, Dilara Hodgins, Kathryn A. Ecol Evol Original Research Stressors and heterogeneity are ubiquitous features of natural environments, and theory suggests that when environmental qualities alter flowering schedules through phenotypic plasticity, assortative mating can result that promotes evolutionary divergence. Therefore, it is important to determine whether common ecological stressors induce similar changes in flowering time. We review previous studies to determine whether two important stressors, water restriction and herbivory, induce consistent flowering time responses among species; for example, how often do water restriction and herbivory both delay flowering? We focus on the direction of change in flowering time, which affects the potential for divergence in heterogeneous environments. We also tested whether these stressors influenced time to flowering and nonphenology traits using Mimulus guttatus. The literature review suggests that water restriction has variable effects on flowering time, whereas herbivory delays flowering with exceptional consistency. In the Mimulus experiment, low water and herbivory advanced and delayed flowering, respectively. Overall, our results temper theoretical predictions for evolutionary divergence due to habitat‐induced changes in flowering time; in particular, we discuss how accounting for variation in the direction of change in flowering time can either increase or decrease the potential for divergence. In addition, we caution against adaptive interpretations of stress‐induced phenology shifts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4717339/ /pubmed/26811768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1821 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jordan, Crispin Y.
Ally, Dilara
Hodgins, Kathryn A.
When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering?
title When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering?
title_full When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering?
title_fullStr When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering?
title_full_unstemmed When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering?
title_short When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering?
title_sort when can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1821
work_keys_str_mv AT jordancrispiny whencanstressfacilitatedivergencebyalteringtimetoflowering
AT allydilara whencanstressfacilitatedivergencebyalteringtimetoflowering
AT hodginskathryna whencanstressfacilitatedivergencebyalteringtimetoflowering