Cargando…
Effect of ski geometry and standing height on kinetic energy: equipment designed to reduce risk of severe traumatic injuries in alpine downhill ski racing
BACKGROUND: Injuries in downhill (DH) are often related to high speed and, therefore, to high energy and forces which are involved in injury situations. Yet to date, no study has investigated the effect of ski geometry and standing height on kinetic energy (E(KIN)) in DH. This knowledge would be ess...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26702013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095465 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Injuries in downhill (DH) are often related to high speed and, therefore, to high energy and forces which are involved in injury situations. Yet to date, no study has investigated the effect of ski geometry and standing height on kinetic energy (E(KIN)) in DH. This knowledge would be essential to define appropriate equipment rules that have the potential to protect the athletes’ health. METHODS: During a field experiment on an official World Cup DH course, 2 recently retired world class skiers skied on 5 different pairs of skis varying in width, length and standing height. Course characteristics, terrain and the skiers’ centre of mass position were captured by a differential Global Navigational Satellite System-based methodology. E(KIN), speed, ski–snow friction force (F(F)), ground reaction force (F(GRF)) and ski–snow friction coefficient (Coeff(F)) were calculated and analysed in dependency of the used skis. RESULTS: In the steep terrain, longer skis with reduced width and standing height significantly decreased average E(KIN) by ∼3%. Locally, even larger reductions of E(KIN) were observed (up to 7%). These local decreases in E(KIN) were mainly explainable by higher F(F). Moreover, Coeff(F) differences seem of greater importance for explaining local F(F) differences than the differences in F(GRF). CONCLUSIONS: Knowing that increased speed and E(KIN) likely lead to increased forces in fall/crash situations, the observed equipment-induced reduction in E(KIN) can be considered a reasonable measure to improve athlete safety, even though the achieved preventative gains are rather small and limited to steep terrain. |
---|