Cargando…

The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: This literature review evaluates the current state of knowledge about the impact of process redesign on the quality of healthcare. METHODS: Pubmed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Business Premier Source were searched for relevant studies published in the last ten years [2004–2014]. To be inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Leijen-Zeelenberg, Janneke E., Elissen, Arianne M. J., Grube, Kerstin, van Raak, Arno J. A., Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M., Kremer, Bernd, Ruwaard, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26782132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1266-0
_version_ 1782410667446239232
author van Leijen-Zeelenberg, Janneke E.
Elissen, Arianne M. J.
Grube, Kerstin
van Raak, Arno J. A.
Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M.
Kremer, Bernd
Ruwaard, Dirk
author_facet van Leijen-Zeelenberg, Janneke E.
Elissen, Arianne M. J.
Grube, Kerstin
van Raak, Arno J. A.
Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M.
Kremer, Bernd
Ruwaard, Dirk
author_sort van Leijen-Zeelenberg, Janneke E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This literature review evaluates the current state of knowledge about the impact of process redesign on the quality of healthcare. METHODS: Pubmed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Business Premier Source were searched for relevant studies published in the last ten years [2004–2014]. To be included, studies had to be original research, published in English with a before-and-after study design, and be focused on changes in healthcare processes and quality of care. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were independently assessed for excellence in reporting by three reviewers using the SQUIRE checklist. Data was extracted using a framework developed for this review. RESULTS: Reporting adequacy varied across the studies. Process redesign interventions were diverse, and none of the studies described their effects on all dimensions of quality defined by the Institute of Medicine. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic literature review suggests that process redesign interventions have positive effects on certain aspects of quality. However, the full impact cannot be determined on the basis of the literature. A wide range of outcome measures were used, and research methods were limited. This review demonstrates the need for further investigation of the impact of redesign interventions on the quality of healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4717535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47175352016-01-20 The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review van Leijen-Zeelenberg, Janneke E. Elissen, Arianne M. J. Grube, Kerstin van Raak, Arno J. A. Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M. Kremer, Bernd Ruwaard, Dirk BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: This literature review evaluates the current state of knowledge about the impact of process redesign on the quality of healthcare. METHODS: Pubmed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Business Premier Source were searched for relevant studies published in the last ten years [2004–2014]. To be included, studies had to be original research, published in English with a before-and-after study design, and be focused on changes in healthcare processes and quality of care. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were independently assessed for excellence in reporting by three reviewers using the SQUIRE checklist. Data was extracted using a framework developed for this review. RESULTS: Reporting adequacy varied across the studies. Process redesign interventions were diverse, and none of the studies described their effects on all dimensions of quality defined by the Institute of Medicine. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic literature review suggests that process redesign interventions have positive effects on certain aspects of quality. However, the full impact cannot be determined on the basis of the literature. A wide range of outcome measures were used, and research methods were limited. This review demonstrates the need for further investigation of the impact of redesign interventions on the quality of healthcare. BioMed Central 2016-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4717535/ /pubmed/26782132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1266-0 Text en © van Leijen-Zeelenberg et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Leijen-Zeelenberg, Janneke E.
Elissen, Arianne M. J.
Grube, Kerstin
van Raak, Arno J. A.
Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M.
Kremer, Bernd
Ruwaard, Dirk
The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review
title The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review
title_full The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review
title_fullStr The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review
title_short The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review
title_sort impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26782132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1266-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vanleijenzeelenbergjannekee theimpactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT elissenariannemj theimpactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT grubekerstin theimpactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT vanraakarnoja theimpactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT vrijhoefhubertusjm theimpactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT kremerbernd theimpactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT ruwaarddirk theimpactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT vanleijenzeelenbergjannekee impactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT elissenariannemj impactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT grubekerstin impactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT vanraakarnoja impactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT vrijhoefhubertusjm impactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT kremerbernd impactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview
AT ruwaarddirk impactofredesigningcareprocessesonqualityofcareasystematicreview