Cargando…
Comparison of C(50) for Propofol-remifentanil Target-controlled Infusion and Bispectral Index at Loss of Consciousness and Response to Painful Stimulus in Elderly and Young Patients
BACKGROUND: In this prospective randomized study, we compared the predicted blood and effect-site C(50) for propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) and the bispectral index (BIS) values at loss of consciousness (LOC) and response to a standard noxious painful stimulus (LOS) in eld...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26228208 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.161338 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: In this prospective randomized study, we compared the predicted blood and effect-site C(50) for propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) and the bispectral index (BIS) values at loss of consciousness (LOC) and response to a standard noxious painful stimulus (LOS) in elderly and young patients, respectively. We hypothesized that the elderly patients will require lower target concentration of both propofol and remifentanil at above two clinical end-points. METHODS: There were 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II unpremedicated patients enrolled in this study, they were divided into elderly group (age ≥65 years, n = 40) and young group (aged 18–64 years, n = 40). Propofol was initially given to a predicted blood concentration of 1.2 μg/ml and thereafter increased by 0.3 μg/ml every 30 s until Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation score was 1. The propofol level was kept constant, and remifentanil was given to provide a predict blood concentration of 2.0 ng/ml, and then increased by 0.3 ng/ml every 30 s until loss of response to a tetanic stimulus. BIS (version 3.22, BIS Quattro sensor) was also recorded. RESULTS: In elderly group, the propofol effect-site C(50) at LOC of was 1.5 (1.4–1.6) μg/ml, was significantly lower than that of young group, which was 2.2 (2.1–2.3) μg/ml, the remifentanil effect-site C(50) at LOS was 3.5 (3.3–3.7) ng/ml in elderly patients, was similar with 3.7 (3.6–3.8) ng/ml in young patients. Fifty percent of patients lost consciousness at a BIS value of 57.3 (56.4–58.1), was similar with that of young group, which was 55.2 (54.0–56.3). CONCLUSION: In elderly patients, the predicted blood and effect-site concentrations of propofol at LOC were lower than that of young patients. At same sedation status, predicted blood and effect-site concentrations of remifentanil required at LOS were similar in elderly and young patients. BIS were not affected by age. Low-propofol/high-opioid may be optional TCI strategy for elderly patients. |
---|