Cargando…
Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis
BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the recommended treatment for gastric cancer with liver metastasis. However, the improvement in survival has been disappointing. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of gastrectomy with transarterial chemoembolization plus SC (GTC) a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26265613 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.162497 |
_version_ | 1782410717127770112 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Sen-Feng Lu, Can-Rong Cheng, Hai-Dong Xi, Hong-Qing Cui, Jian-Xin Li, Ji-Yang Shen, Wei-Song Chen, Lin |
author_facet | Liu, Sen-Feng Lu, Can-Rong Cheng, Hai-Dong Xi, Hong-Qing Cui, Jian-Xin Li, Ji-Yang Shen, Wei-Song Chen, Lin |
author_sort | Liu, Sen-Feng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the recommended treatment for gastric cancer with liver metastasis. However, the improvement in survival has been disappointing. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of gastrectomy with transarterial chemoembolization plus SC (GTC) and SC alone for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2013, 107 gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastasis attending the four participating centers were enrolled in this multicenter, ambispective, controlled cohort study. Patients who underwent GTC (n = 32) were compared with controls who were received SC alone (n = 75). The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were response rate to treatment and treatment-related adverse effects. RESULTS: The median OS was 14.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.1–14.9 months) in the GTC treatment group and 8.0 months (95% CI: 6.6–9.4 months) in SC group, this difference being statistically significant (P < 0.001). The median PFS was significantly longer in the GTC than in the SC group (5 months, 95% CI: 2.2–7.8 months vs. 3 months, 95% CI: 2.3–3.4 months, respectively) (P < 0.001). The rate of response to treatment was significantly better in the GTC than the SC group (59.4% vs. 37.4%, respectively) (P = 0.035). According to multivariate analysis, OS in patients receiving combination treatment was significantly correlated with the size (P = 0.037) and extent of liver metastases (P < 0.001). PFS was also correlated with the extent of liver metastases (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: GTC is more effective than SC alone in patients with gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. GTC therapy prolongs the survival of selected gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastasis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4717974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47179742016-04-04 Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis Liu, Sen-Feng Lu, Can-Rong Cheng, Hai-Dong Xi, Hong-Qing Cui, Jian-Xin Li, Ji-Yang Shen, Wei-Song Chen, Lin Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the recommended treatment for gastric cancer with liver metastasis. However, the improvement in survival has been disappointing. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of gastrectomy with transarterial chemoembolization plus SC (GTC) and SC alone for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2013, 107 gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastasis attending the four participating centers were enrolled in this multicenter, ambispective, controlled cohort study. Patients who underwent GTC (n = 32) were compared with controls who were received SC alone (n = 75). The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were response rate to treatment and treatment-related adverse effects. RESULTS: The median OS was 14.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.1–14.9 months) in the GTC treatment group and 8.0 months (95% CI: 6.6–9.4 months) in SC group, this difference being statistically significant (P < 0.001). The median PFS was significantly longer in the GTC than in the SC group (5 months, 95% CI: 2.2–7.8 months vs. 3 months, 95% CI: 2.3–3.4 months, respectively) (P < 0.001). The rate of response to treatment was significantly better in the GTC than the SC group (59.4% vs. 37.4%, respectively) (P = 0.035). According to multivariate analysis, OS in patients receiving combination treatment was significantly correlated with the size (P = 0.037) and extent of liver metastases (P < 0.001). PFS was also correlated with the extent of liver metastases (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: GTC is more effective than SC alone in patients with gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. GTC therapy prolongs the survival of selected gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastasis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4717974/ /pubmed/26265613 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.162497 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Liu, Sen-Feng Lu, Can-Rong Cheng, Hai-Dong Xi, Hong-Qing Cui, Jian-Xin Li, Ji-Yang Shen, Wei-Song Chen, Lin Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis |
title | Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis |
title_full | Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis |
title_short | Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis |
title_sort | comparison of therapeutic efficacy between gastrectomy with transarterial chemoembolization plus systemic chemotherapy and systemic chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26265613 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.162497 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liusenfeng comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis AT lucanrong comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis AT chenghaidong comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis AT xihongqing comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis AT cuijianxin comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis AT lijiyang comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis AT shenweisong comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis AT chenlin comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis |