Cargando…

Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis

BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the recommended treatment for gastric cancer with liver metastasis. However, the improvement in survival has been disappointing. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of gastrectomy with transarterial chemoembolization plus SC (GTC) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Sen-Feng, Lu, Can-Rong, Cheng, Hai-Dong, Xi, Hong-Qing, Cui, Jian-Xin, Li, Ji-Yang, Shen, Wei-Song, Chen, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26265613
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.162497
_version_ 1782410717127770112
author Liu, Sen-Feng
Lu, Can-Rong
Cheng, Hai-Dong
Xi, Hong-Qing
Cui, Jian-Xin
Li, Ji-Yang
Shen, Wei-Song
Chen, Lin
author_facet Liu, Sen-Feng
Lu, Can-Rong
Cheng, Hai-Dong
Xi, Hong-Qing
Cui, Jian-Xin
Li, Ji-Yang
Shen, Wei-Song
Chen, Lin
author_sort Liu, Sen-Feng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the recommended treatment for gastric cancer with liver metastasis. However, the improvement in survival has been disappointing. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of gastrectomy with transarterial chemoembolization plus SC (GTC) and SC alone for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2013, 107 gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastasis attending the four participating centers were enrolled in this multicenter, ambispective, controlled cohort study. Patients who underwent GTC (n = 32) were compared with controls who were received SC alone (n = 75). The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were response rate to treatment and treatment-related adverse effects. RESULTS: The median OS was 14.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.1–14.9 months) in the GTC treatment group and 8.0 months (95% CI: 6.6–9.4 months) in SC group, this difference being statistically significant (P < 0.001). The median PFS was significantly longer in the GTC than in the SC group (5 months, 95% CI: 2.2–7.8 months vs. 3 months, 95% CI: 2.3–3.4 months, respectively) (P < 0.001). The rate of response to treatment was significantly better in the GTC than the SC group (59.4% vs. 37.4%, respectively) (P = 0.035). According to multivariate analysis, OS in patients receiving combination treatment was significantly correlated with the size (P = 0.037) and extent of liver metastases (P < 0.001). PFS was also correlated with the extent of liver metastases (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: GTC is more effective than SC alone in patients with gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. GTC therapy prolongs the survival of selected gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4717974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47179742016-04-04 Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis Liu, Sen-Feng Lu, Can-Rong Cheng, Hai-Dong Xi, Hong-Qing Cui, Jian-Xin Li, Ji-Yang Shen, Wei-Song Chen, Lin Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the recommended treatment for gastric cancer with liver metastasis. However, the improvement in survival has been disappointing. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of gastrectomy with transarterial chemoembolization plus SC (GTC) and SC alone for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2013, 107 gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastasis attending the four participating centers were enrolled in this multicenter, ambispective, controlled cohort study. Patients who underwent GTC (n = 32) were compared with controls who were received SC alone (n = 75). The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were response rate to treatment and treatment-related adverse effects. RESULTS: The median OS was 14.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.1–14.9 months) in the GTC treatment group and 8.0 months (95% CI: 6.6–9.4 months) in SC group, this difference being statistically significant (P < 0.001). The median PFS was significantly longer in the GTC than in the SC group (5 months, 95% CI: 2.2–7.8 months vs. 3 months, 95% CI: 2.3–3.4 months, respectively) (P < 0.001). The rate of response to treatment was significantly better in the GTC than the SC group (59.4% vs. 37.4%, respectively) (P = 0.035). According to multivariate analysis, OS in patients receiving combination treatment was significantly correlated with the size (P = 0.037) and extent of liver metastases (P < 0.001). PFS was also correlated with the extent of liver metastases (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: GTC is more effective than SC alone in patients with gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. GTC therapy prolongs the survival of selected gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastasis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4717974/ /pubmed/26265613 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.162497 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Liu, Sen-Feng
Lu, Can-Rong
Cheng, Hai-Dong
Xi, Hong-Qing
Cui, Jian-Xin
Li, Ji-Yang
Shen, Wei-Song
Chen, Lin
Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis
title Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis
title_full Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis
title_fullStr Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis
title_short Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Gastrectomy with Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Systemic Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis
title_sort comparison of therapeutic efficacy between gastrectomy with transarterial chemoembolization plus systemic chemotherapy and systemic chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26265613
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.162497
work_keys_str_mv AT liusenfeng comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis
AT lucanrong comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis
AT chenghaidong comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis
AT xihongqing comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis
AT cuijianxin comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis
AT lijiyang comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis
AT shenweisong comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis
AT chenlin comparisonoftherapeuticefficacybetweengastrectomywithtransarterialchemoembolizationplussystemicchemotherapyandsystemicchemotherapyaloneingastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasis