Cargando…
Usefulness of using laser-induced photoacoustic measurement and 3.0 Tesla MRI to assess knee cartilage damage: a comparison study
BACKGROUND: T2 mapping is an MRI method particularly reflective of the collagen arrangement in the cartilage, and diffusion tensor (DT) imaging captures the diffusion of water molecules. Laser-induced photoacoustic measurement (LIPA) makes it possible to assess not only the thickness of the cartilag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26717992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0899-4 |
_version_ | 1782410728572977152 |
---|---|
author | Ukai, Taku Sato, Masato Ishihara, Miya Yokoyama, Munetaka Takagaki, Tomonori Mitani, Genya Tani, Yoshiki Yamashita, Tomohiro Imai, Yutaka Mochida, Joji |
author_facet | Ukai, Taku Sato, Masato Ishihara, Miya Yokoyama, Munetaka Takagaki, Tomonori Mitani, Genya Tani, Yoshiki Yamashita, Tomohiro Imai, Yutaka Mochida, Joji |
author_sort | Ukai, Taku |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: T2 mapping is an MRI method particularly reflective of the collagen arrangement in the cartilage, and diffusion tensor (DT) imaging captures the diffusion of water molecules. Laser-induced photoacoustic measurement (LIPA) makes it possible to assess not only the thickness of the cartilage layer but also its viscoelastic properties. By assessing cartilage damage assessment using LIPA and 3.0 Tesla MRI (T2 mapping and DT imaging), this study investigates the usefulness of the various methods. METHODS: The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification was used to classify 29 bone cartilage pieces excised during surgical procedures. At the same time, LIPA was performed at sites matching the area of cartilage damage. MRI was performed preoperatively to measure the T2 and the apparent diffusion coefficient. In addition, tissue sections for histological assessment using the Mankin score were prepared for each ICRS grade, and the results with the various methods were compared. RESULTS: With DT imaging, significant differences were observed in all grades (P < 0.01). With T2 mapping, significant differences were observed in all grades except for grade 1 versus grade 2 (P < 0.01). With LIPA, significant differences were observed in ICRS grade 1 versus grade 3 (P < 0.05), grade 1 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), grade 2 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), and grade 3 versus grade 4 (P < 0.05). With the Mankin score, significant differences were observed in ICRS grade 1 versus grade 3 (P < 0.01), grade 1 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), grade 2 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), and grade 3 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01). Correlations were observed in all combinations of ICRS grade with DT imaging, T2 mapping, LIPA, and Mankin score. Correlations were observed between the degree of histological degeneration and DT imaging, T2 mapping, and ICRS grade, but LIPA had a weaker correlation than MRI. CONCLUSIONS: In the assessment of knee osteoarthritis, there are instances where it is difficult to assess the damaged cartilage site with MRI alone, and we believe that it is desirable to use a combination of LIPA and MRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4718041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47180412016-01-20 Usefulness of using laser-induced photoacoustic measurement and 3.0 Tesla MRI to assess knee cartilage damage: a comparison study Ukai, Taku Sato, Masato Ishihara, Miya Yokoyama, Munetaka Takagaki, Tomonori Mitani, Genya Tani, Yoshiki Yamashita, Tomohiro Imai, Yutaka Mochida, Joji Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: T2 mapping is an MRI method particularly reflective of the collagen arrangement in the cartilage, and diffusion tensor (DT) imaging captures the diffusion of water molecules. Laser-induced photoacoustic measurement (LIPA) makes it possible to assess not only the thickness of the cartilage layer but also its viscoelastic properties. By assessing cartilage damage assessment using LIPA and 3.0 Tesla MRI (T2 mapping and DT imaging), this study investigates the usefulness of the various methods. METHODS: The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification was used to classify 29 bone cartilage pieces excised during surgical procedures. At the same time, LIPA was performed at sites matching the area of cartilage damage. MRI was performed preoperatively to measure the T2 and the apparent diffusion coefficient. In addition, tissue sections for histological assessment using the Mankin score were prepared for each ICRS grade, and the results with the various methods were compared. RESULTS: With DT imaging, significant differences were observed in all grades (P < 0.01). With T2 mapping, significant differences were observed in all grades except for grade 1 versus grade 2 (P < 0.01). With LIPA, significant differences were observed in ICRS grade 1 versus grade 3 (P < 0.05), grade 1 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), grade 2 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), and grade 3 versus grade 4 (P < 0.05). With the Mankin score, significant differences were observed in ICRS grade 1 versus grade 3 (P < 0.01), grade 1 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), grade 2 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), and grade 3 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01). Correlations were observed in all combinations of ICRS grade with DT imaging, T2 mapping, LIPA, and Mankin score. Correlations were observed between the degree of histological degeneration and DT imaging, T2 mapping, and ICRS grade, but LIPA had a weaker correlation than MRI. CONCLUSIONS: In the assessment of knee osteoarthritis, there are instances where it is difficult to assess the damaged cartilage site with MRI alone, and we believe that it is desirable to use a combination of LIPA and MRI. BioMed Central 2015-12-30 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4718041/ /pubmed/26717992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0899-4 Text en © Ukai et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ukai, Taku Sato, Masato Ishihara, Miya Yokoyama, Munetaka Takagaki, Tomonori Mitani, Genya Tani, Yoshiki Yamashita, Tomohiro Imai, Yutaka Mochida, Joji Usefulness of using laser-induced photoacoustic measurement and 3.0 Tesla MRI to assess knee cartilage damage: a comparison study |
title | Usefulness of using laser-induced photoacoustic measurement and 3.0 Tesla MRI to assess knee cartilage damage: a comparison study |
title_full | Usefulness of using laser-induced photoacoustic measurement and 3.0 Tesla MRI to assess knee cartilage damage: a comparison study |
title_fullStr | Usefulness of using laser-induced photoacoustic measurement and 3.0 Tesla MRI to assess knee cartilage damage: a comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Usefulness of using laser-induced photoacoustic measurement and 3.0 Tesla MRI to assess knee cartilage damage: a comparison study |
title_short | Usefulness of using laser-induced photoacoustic measurement and 3.0 Tesla MRI to assess knee cartilage damage: a comparison study |
title_sort | usefulness of using laser-induced photoacoustic measurement and 3.0 tesla mri to assess knee cartilage damage: a comparison study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26717992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0899-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ukaitaku usefulnessofusinglaserinducedphotoacousticmeasurementand30teslamritoassesskneecartilagedamageacomparisonstudy AT satomasato usefulnessofusinglaserinducedphotoacousticmeasurementand30teslamritoassesskneecartilagedamageacomparisonstudy AT ishiharamiya usefulnessofusinglaserinducedphotoacousticmeasurementand30teslamritoassesskneecartilagedamageacomparisonstudy AT yokoyamamunetaka usefulnessofusinglaserinducedphotoacousticmeasurementand30teslamritoassesskneecartilagedamageacomparisonstudy AT takagakitomonori usefulnessofusinglaserinducedphotoacousticmeasurementand30teslamritoassesskneecartilagedamageacomparisonstudy AT mitanigenya usefulnessofusinglaserinducedphotoacousticmeasurementand30teslamritoassesskneecartilagedamageacomparisonstudy AT taniyoshiki usefulnessofusinglaserinducedphotoacousticmeasurementand30teslamritoassesskneecartilagedamageacomparisonstudy AT yamashitatomohiro usefulnessofusinglaserinducedphotoacousticmeasurementand30teslamritoassesskneecartilagedamageacomparisonstudy AT imaiyutaka usefulnessofusinglaserinducedphotoacousticmeasurementand30teslamritoassesskneecartilagedamageacomparisonstudy AT mochidajoji usefulnessofusinglaserinducedphotoacousticmeasurementand30teslamritoassesskneecartilagedamageacomparisonstudy |