Cargando…
Volumetric and Correlational Implications of Brain Parcellation Method Selection: A 3-Way Comparison in the Frontal Lobes
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to compare distinct brain frontal lobe parcellation methods across 90 brain magnetic resonance imaging scans and examine their associations with cognition in older age. METHODS: Three parcellation methods (Manual, FreeSurfer, and Stereology) were applied to T1-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000314 |
_version_ | 1782410754535718912 |
---|---|
author | Cox, Simon R. McKenzie, Tahlia I. Aribisala, Benjamin S. Royle, Natalie A. MacPherson, Sarah E. MacLullich, Alasdair M.J. Bastin, Mark E. Wardlaw, Joanna M. Deary, Ian J. Ferguson, Karen J. |
author_facet | Cox, Simon R. McKenzie, Tahlia I. Aribisala, Benjamin S. Royle, Natalie A. MacPherson, Sarah E. MacLullich, Alasdair M.J. Bastin, Mark E. Wardlaw, Joanna M. Deary, Ian J. Ferguson, Karen J. |
author_sort | Cox, Simon R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to compare distinct brain frontal lobe parcellation methods across 90 brain magnetic resonance imaging scans and examine their associations with cognition in older age. METHODS: Three parcellation methods (Manual, FreeSurfer, and Stereology) were applied to T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of 90 older men, aged ∼73 years. A measure of general fluid intelligence (g(f)) associated with dorsolateral frontal regions was also derived from a contemporaneous psychological test battery. RESULTS: Despite highly discordant raw volumes for the same nominal regions, Manual and FreeSurfer (but not Stereology) left dorsolateral measures were significantly correlated with g(f) (r > 0.22), whereas orbital and inferior lateral volumes were not, consistent with the hypothesized frontal localization of g(f). CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences in specific frontal lobe brain volumes—variously measured—show consistent associations with cognitive ability in older age. Importantly, differences in parcellation protocol for some regions that may impact the outcome of brain-cognition analyses are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4718185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47181852016-02-17 Volumetric and Correlational Implications of Brain Parcellation Method Selection: A 3-Way Comparison in the Frontal Lobes Cox, Simon R. McKenzie, Tahlia I. Aribisala, Benjamin S. Royle, Natalie A. MacPherson, Sarah E. MacLullich, Alasdair M.J. Bastin, Mark E. Wardlaw, Joanna M. Deary, Ian J. Ferguson, Karen J. J Comput Assist Tomogr Neuroradiology OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to compare distinct brain frontal lobe parcellation methods across 90 brain magnetic resonance imaging scans and examine their associations with cognition in older age. METHODS: Three parcellation methods (Manual, FreeSurfer, and Stereology) were applied to T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of 90 older men, aged ∼73 years. A measure of general fluid intelligence (g(f)) associated with dorsolateral frontal regions was also derived from a contemporaneous psychological test battery. RESULTS: Despite highly discordant raw volumes for the same nominal regions, Manual and FreeSurfer (but not Stereology) left dorsolateral measures were significantly correlated with g(f) (r > 0.22), whereas orbital and inferior lateral volumes were not, consistent with the hypothesized frontal localization of g(f). CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences in specific frontal lobe brain volumes—variously measured—show consistent associations with cognitive ability in older age. Importantly, differences in parcellation protocol for some regions that may impact the outcome of brain-cognition analyses are discussed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-01 2016-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4718185/ /pubmed/26466114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000314 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroradiology Cox, Simon R. McKenzie, Tahlia I. Aribisala, Benjamin S. Royle, Natalie A. MacPherson, Sarah E. MacLullich, Alasdair M.J. Bastin, Mark E. Wardlaw, Joanna M. Deary, Ian J. Ferguson, Karen J. Volumetric and Correlational Implications of Brain Parcellation Method Selection: A 3-Way Comparison in the Frontal Lobes |
title | Volumetric and Correlational Implications of Brain Parcellation Method Selection: A 3-Way Comparison in the Frontal Lobes |
title_full | Volumetric and Correlational Implications of Brain Parcellation Method Selection: A 3-Way Comparison in the Frontal Lobes |
title_fullStr | Volumetric and Correlational Implications of Brain Parcellation Method Selection: A 3-Way Comparison in the Frontal Lobes |
title_full_unstemmed | Volumetric and Correlational Implications of Brain Parcellation Method Selection: A 3-Way Comparison in the Frontal Lobes |
title_short | Volumetric and Correlational Implications of Brain Parcellation Method Selection: A 3-Way Comparison in the Frontal Lobes |
title_sort | volumetric and correlational implications of brain parcellation method selection: a 3-way comparison in the frontal lobes |
topic | Neuroradiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coxsimonr volumetricandcorrelationalimplicationsofbrainparcellationmethodselectiona3waycomparisoninthefrontallobes AT mckenzietahliai volumetricandcorrelationalimplicationsofbrainparcellationmethodselectiona3waycomparisoninthefrontallobes AT aribisalabenjamins volumetricandcorrelationalimplicationsofbrainparcellationmethodselectiona3waycomparisoninthefrontallobes AT roylenataliea volumetricandcorrelationalimplicationsofbrainparcellationmethodselectiona3waycomparisoninthefrontallobes AT macphersonsarahe volumetricandcorrelationalimplicationsofbrainparcellationmethodselectiona3waycomparisoninthefrontallobes AT maclullichalasdairmj volumetricandcorrelationalimplicationsofbrainparcellationmethodselectiona3waycomparisoninthefrontallobes AT bastinmarke volumetricandcorrelationalimplicationsofbrainparcellationmethodselectiona3waycomparisoninthefrontallobes AT wardlawjoannam volumetricandcorrelationalimplicationsofbrainparcellationmethodselectiona3waycomparisoninthefrontallobes AT dearyianj volumetricandcorrelationalimplicationsofbrainparcellationmethodselectiona3waycomparisoninthefrontallobes AT fergusonkarenj volumetricandcorrelationalimplicationsofbrainparcellationmethodselectiona3waycomparisoninthefrontallobes |