Cargando…
Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series
Clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in esophagus are limited, because of the relatively rare incidence of esophageal GISTs. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of esoph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26765432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002446 |
_version_ | 1782410765030916096 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Fan Tian, Yangzi Liu, Zhen Xu, Guanghui Liu, Shushang Guo, Man Lian, Xiao Fan, Daiming Zhang, Hongwei |
author_facet | Feng, Fan Tian, Yangzi Liu, Zhen Xu, Guanghui Liu, Shushang Guo, Man Lian, Xiao Fan, Daiming Zhang, Hongwei |
author_sort | Feng, Fan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in esophagus are limited, because of the relatively rare incidence of esophageal GISTs. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of esophageal GISTs, and to investigate the potential factors that may predict prognosis. Esophageal GIST cases were obtained from our center and from case reports and clinical studies extracted from MEDLINE. Clinicopathologic features and survivals were analyzed and compared with gastric GISTs from our center. The most common location was lower esophagus (86.84%), followed by middle and upper esophagus (11.40% and 1.76%). The majority of esophageal GISTs were classified as high-risk category (70.83%). Mitotic index was correlated with histologic type, mutational status, and tumor size. The 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 65.1% and 65.9%, respectively. Tumor size, mitotic index, and National Institutes of Health risk classification were associated with prognosis of esophageal GISTs. Only tumor size, however, was the independent risk factor for the prognosis of esophageal GISTs. In comparison to gastric GISTs, the distribution of tumor size, histologic type, and National Institutes of Health risk classification were significantly different between esophageal GISTs and gastric GISTs. The disease-free survival and disease-specific survival of esophageal GISTs were significantly lower than that of gastric GISTs. The most common location for esophageal GISTs was lower esophagus, and most of the esophageal GISTs are high-risk category. Tumor size was the independent risk factor for the prognosis of esophageal GISTs. Esophageal GISTs differ significantly from gastric GISTs in respect to clinicopathologic features. The prognosis of esophageal GISTs was worse than that of gastric GISTs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4718258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47182582016-02-04 Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series Feng, Fan Tian, Yangzi Liu, Zhen Xu, Guanghui Liu, Shushang Guo, Man Lian, Xiao Fan, Daiming Zhang, Hongwei Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in esophagus are limited, because of the relatively rare incidence of esophageal GISTs. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of esophageal GISTs, and to investigate the potential factors that may predict prognosis. Esophageal GIST cases were obtained from our center and from case reports and clinical studies extracted from MEDLINE. Clinicopathologic features and survivals were analyzed and compared with gastric GISTs from our center. The most common location was lower esophagus (86.84%), followed by middle and upper esophagus (11.40% and 1.76%). The majority of esophageal GISTs were classified as high-risk category (70.83%). Mitotic index was correlated with histologic type, mutational status, and tumor size. The 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 65.1% and 65.9%, respectively. Tumor size, mitotic index, and National Institutes of Health risk classification were associated with prognosis of esophageal GISTs. Only tumor size, however, was the independent risk factor for the prognosis of esophageal GISTs. In comparison to gastric GISTs, the distribution of tumor size, histologic type, and National Institutes of Health risk classification were significantly different between esophageal GISTs and gastric GISTs. The disease-free survival and disease-specific survival of esophageal GISTs were significantly lower than that of gastric GISTs. The most common location for esophageal GISTs was lower esophagus, and most of the esophageal GISTs are high-risk category. Tumor size was the independent risk factor for the prognosis of esophageal GISTs. Esophageal GISTs differ significantly from gastric GISTs in respect to clinicopathologic features. The prognosis of esophageal GISTs was worse than that of gastric GISTs. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4718258/ /pubmed/26765432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002446 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Feng, Fan Tian, Yangzi Liu, Zhen Xu, Guanghui Liu, Shushang Guo, Man Lian, Xiao Fan, Daiming Zhang, Hongwei Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series |
title | Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series |
title_full | Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series |
title_fullStr | Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series |
title_short | Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series |
title_sort | clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: evaluation of a pooled case series |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26765432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengfan clinicopathologicfeaturesandclinicaloutcomesofesophagealgastrointestinalstromaltumorevaluationofapooledcaseseries AT tianyangzi clinicopathologicfeaturesandclinicaloutcomesofesophagealgastrointestinalstromaltumorevaluationofapooledcaseseries AT liuzhen clinicopathologicfeaturesandclinicaloutcomesofesophagealgastrointestinalstromaltumorevaluationofapooledcaseseries AT xuguanghui clinicopathologicfeaturesandclinicaloutcomesofesophagealgastrointestinalstromaltumorevaluationofapooledcaseseries AT liushushang clinicopathologicfeaturesandclinicaloutcomesofesophagealgastrointestinalstromaltumorevaluationofapooledcaseseries AT guoman clinicopathologicfeaturesandclinicaloutcomesofesophagealgastrointestinalstromaltumorevaluationofapooledcaseseries AT lianxiao clinicopathologicfeaturesandclinicaloutcomesofesophagealgastrointestinalstromaltumorevaluationofapooledcaseseries AT fandaiming clinicopathologicfeaturesandclinicaloutcomesofesophagealgastrointestinalstromaltumorevaluationofapooledcaseseries AT zhanghongwei clinicopathologicfeaturesandclinicaloutcomesofesophagealgastrointestinalstromaltumorevaluationofapooledcaseseries |