Cargando…

Incidence of Augmentation in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome Patients May Not Be That High: Evidence From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Augmentation is a common complication of primary restless legs syndrome (RLS) during treatment; however, its incidence rate remains unclear. The aim of this study is investigate the rate of augmentation during RLS treatment. We searched 6 databases, including PubMed, OVID, Embase, Wiley citations, W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Guang Jian, Wu, Lang, Wang, Song Lin, Ding, Li, Xu, Li Li, Wang, Yun Fu, Chang, Li Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26765466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002504
_version_ 1782410772591149056
author Liu, Guang Jian
Wu, Lang
Wang, Song Lin
Ding, Li
Xu, Li Li
Wang, Yun Fu
Chang, Li Ying
author_facet Liu, Guang Jian
Wu, Lang
Wang, Song Lin
Ding, Li
Xu, Li Li
Wang, Yun Fu
Chang, Li Ying
author_sort Liu, Guang Jian
collection PubMed
description Augmentation is a common complication of primary restless legs syndrome (RLS) during treatment; however, its incidence rate remains unclear. The aim of this study is investigate the rate of augmentation during RLS treatment. We searched 6 databases, including PubMed, OVID, Embase, Wiley citations, Web of Science research platform (including SciELO Citation Index, Medline, KCI Korean Journal Database, the Web of Science™ Core Collection), and the Cochrane library, and screened the reference lists of the included trials and recently published reviews. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that reported augmentation events during RLS treatment. Primary RLS patients older than 18 years. No restrictions regarding intervention types were applied. Three investigators independently extracted and pooled the data to analyze the augmentation rate of the total sample and of patient subgroups with different interventions, treatment durations and drug regimens and different geographic origins. Fixed-effects or random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. A total of 60 studies involving 11,543 participants suggested an overall augmentation rate of 5.6% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 4.0–7.7). The augmentation incidence was 6.1% (95% CI, 4.1–9.1) for long-term treatment and 3.3% (95% CI, 1.4–7.3) for short-term treatment. In addition, 27.1% (95% CI, 12.3–49.5) of the levodopa-treated patients, 6.0% (95% CI, 4.1–8.8) of the patients treated with dopamine agonists, and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.2–3.3) of the patients taking pregabalin or gabapentin developed augmentation. Augmentation occurred in 7.2% (95% CI, 5.0–10.3) of the patients taking immediate-release drugs and in 1.7% (95% CI, 0.6–5.0) of the patients taking transdermal application. The main limitations are that the augmentation rates were not evaluated according to drug dosage, gender, and age and symptom severity. Approximately 5 to 6 in 100 RLS patients developed augmentation during treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4718292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47182922016-02-04 Incidence of Augmentation in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome Patients May Not Be That High: Evidence From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Liu, Guang Jian Wu, Lang Wang, Song Lin Ding, Li Xu, Li Li Wang, Yun Fu Chang, Li Ying Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 Augmentation is a common complication of primary restless legs syndrome (RLS) during treatment; however, its incidence rate remains unclear. The aim of this study is investigate the rate of augmentation during RLS treatment. We searched 6 databases, including PubMed, OVID, Embase, Wiley citations, Web of Science research platform (including SciELO Citation Index, Medline, KCI Korean Journal Database, the Web of Science™ Core Collection), and the Cochrane library, and screened the reference lists of the included trials and recently published reviews. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that reported augmentation events during RLS treatment. Primary RLS patients older than 18 years. No restrictions regarding intervention types were applied. Three investigators independently extracted and pooled the data to analyze the augmentation rate of the total sample and of patient subgroups with different interventions, treatment durations and drug regimens and different geographic origins. Fixed-effects or random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. A total of 60 studies involving 11,543 participants suggested an overall augmentation rate of 5.6% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 4.0–7.7). The augmentation incidence was 6.1% (95% CI, 4.1–9.1) for long-term treatment and 3.3% (95% CI, 1.4–7.3) for short-term treatment. In addition, 27.1% (95% CI, 12.3–49.5) of the levodopa-treated patients, 6.0% (95% CI, 4.1–8.8) of the patients treated with dopamine agonists, and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.2–3.3) of the patients taking pregabalin or gabapentin developed augmentation. Augmentation occurred in 7.2% (95% CI, 5.0–10.3) of the patients taking immediate-release drugs and in 1.7% (95% CI, 0.6–5.0) of the patients taking transdermal application. The main limitations are that the augmentation rates were not evaluated according to drug dosage, gender, and age and symptom severity. Approximately 5 to 6 in 100 RLS patients developed augmentation during treatment. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4718292/ /pubmed/26765466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002504 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5300
Liu, Guang Jian
Wu, Lang
Wang, Song Lin
Ding, Li
Xu, Li Li
Wang, Yun Fu
Chang, Li Ying
Incidence of Augmentation in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome Patients May Not Be That High: Evidence From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Incidence of Augmentation in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome Patients May Not Be That High: Evidence From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Incidence of Augmentation in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome Patients May Not Be That High: Evidence From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Incidence of Augmentation in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome Patients May Not Be That High: Evidence From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of Augmentation in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome Patients May Not Be That High: Evidence From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Incidence of Augmentation in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome Patients May Not Be That High: Evidence From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort incidence of augmentation in primary restless legs syndrome patients may not be that high: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 5300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26765466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002504
work_keys_str_mv AT liuguangjian incidenceofaugmentationinprimaryrestlesslegssyndromepatientsmaynotbethathighevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wulang incidenceofaugmentationinprimaryrestlesslegssyndromepatientsmaynotbethathighevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangsonglin incidenceofaugmentationinprimaryrestlesslegssyndromepatientsmaynotbethathighevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dingli incidenceofaugmentationinprimaryrestlesslegssyndromepatientsmaynotbethathighevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xulili incidenceofaugmentationinprimaryrestlesslegssyndromepatientsmaynotbethathighevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyunfu incidenceofaugmentationinprimaryrestlesslegssyndromepatientsmaynotbethathighevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT changliying incidenceofaugmentationinprimaryrestlesslegssyndromepatientsmaynotbethathighevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis