Cargando…

Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION. The study objective is to evaluate critical points in the process of pre-analytical histology in an Anatomic Pathology laboratory. Errors are an integral part of human systems, including the complex system of Anatomic Pathology. Previous studies focused on errors committed in diagnosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MORELLI, P., PORAZZI, E., RUSPINI, M., RESTELLI, U., BANFI, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore SpA 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24396989
_version_ 1782410793328836608
author MORELLI, P.
PORAZZI, E.
RUSPINI, M.
RESTELLI, U.
BANFI, G.
author_facet MORELLI, P.
PORAZZI, E.
RUSPINI, M.
RESTELLI, U.
BANFI, G.
author_sort MORELLI, P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION. The study objective is to evaluate critical points in the process of pre-analytical histology in an Anatomic Pathology laboratory. Errors are an integral part of human systems, including the complex system of Anatomic Pathology. Previous studies focused on errors committed in diagnosis and did not consider the issues related to the histology preparation of routine processes. METHODS. Root Cause Analysis was applied to the process of histology preparation in order to identify the root cause of each previously identified problem. The analysis started by defining an 'a priori' list of errors that could occur in the histology preparation processes. During a three-month period, a trained technician tracked the errors encountered during the process and reported them on a form. 'Fishbone' diagram and 'Five whys' methods were then applied. RESULTS. 8,346 histological cases were reviewed, for which 19,774 samples were made and from which 29,956 histologies were prepared. 132 errors were identified. Errors were detected in each phase: accessioning (6.5%), gross dissecting (28%), processing (1.5%), embedding (4.5%), tissue cutting and slide mounting (23%), coloring, (1.5%), labeling and releasing (35%). DISCUSSION. Root cause analysis is effective and easy to use in clinical risk management. It is an important step for the identification and prevention of errors, that are frequently due to multiple causes. Developing operators' awareness of their central role in the risk management process is possible by targeted training. Furthermore, by highlighting the most relevant points of interest, it is possible to improve both the methodology and the procedural safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4718384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Pacini Editore SpA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47183842016-02-02 Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study MORELLI, P. PORAZZI, E. RUSPINI, M. RESTELLI, U. BANFI, G. J Prev Med Hyg Original Article INTRODUCTION. The study objective is to evaluate critical points in the process of pre-analytical histology in an Anatomic Pathology laboratory. Errors are an integral part of human systems, including the complex system of Anatomic Pathology. Previous studies focused on errors committed in diagnosis and did not consider the issues related to the histology preparation of routine processes. METHODS. Root Cause Analysis was applied to the process of histology preparation in order to identify the root cause of each previously identified problem. The analysis started by defining an 'a priori' list of errors that could occur in the histology preparation processes. During a three-month period, a trained technician tracked the errors encountered during the process and reported them on a form. 'Fishbone' diagram and 'Five whys' methods were then applied. RESULTS. 8,346 histological cases were reviewed, for which 19,774 samples were made and from which 29,956 histologies were prepared. 132 errors were identified. Errors were detected in each phase: accessioning (6.5%), gross dissecting (28%), processing (1.5%), embedding (4.5%), tissue cutting and slide mounting (23%), coloring, (1.5%), labeling and releasing (35%). DISCUSSION. Root cause analysis is effective and easy to use in clinical risk management. It is an important step for the identification and prevention of errors, that are frequently due to multiple causes. Developing operators' awareness of their central role in the risk management process is possible by targeted training. Furthermore, by highlighting the most relevant points of interest, it is possible to improve both the methodology and the procedural safety. Pacini Editore SpA 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4718384/ /pubmed/24396989 Text en © Copyright by Pacini Editore SpA, Pisa, Italy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License, which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any digital medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. For details, please refer to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
MORELLI, P.
PORAZZI, E.
RUSPINI, M.
RESTELLI, U.
BANFI, G.
Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study
title Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study
title_full Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study
title_fullStr Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study
title_short Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study
title_sort analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24396989
work_keys_str_mv AT morellip analysisoferrorsinhistologybyrootcauseanalysisapilotstudy
AT porazzie analysisoferrorsinhistologybyrootcauseanalysisapilotstudy
AT ruspinim analysisoferrorsinhistologybyrootcauseanalysisapilotstudy
AT restelliu analysisoferrorsinhistologybyrootcauseanalysisapilotstudy
AT banfig analysisoferrorsinhistologybyrootcauseanalysisapilotstudy