Cargando…

Clinical Significance of the Edema Index in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

BACKGROUND: Proper monitoring for volume overload is important to improve prognosis in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The association between volume status and residual renal function (RRF) remains an unresolved issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between the edem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Seok Hui, Choi, Eun Woo, Park, Jong Won, Cho, Kyu Hyang, Do, Jun Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26785259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147070
_version_ 1782410808578277376
author Kang, Seok Hui
Choi, Eun Woo
Park, Jong Won
Cho, Kyu Hyang
Do, Jun Young
author_facet Kang, Seok Hui
Choi, Eun Woo
Park, Jong Won
Cho, Kyu Hyang
Do, Jun Young
author_sort Kang, Seok Hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proper monitoring for volume overload is important to improve prognosis in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The association between volume status and residual renal function (RRF) remains an unresolved issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between the edema index and survival or RRF in incident PD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified all adults who underwent PD. The edema index was defined as the ratio of extracellular fluid to total body fluid. Participants with available data regarding survivorship or non-survivorship during the first year after PD initiation were included in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The cutoff value of the edema index for 1-year mortality was >0.371 in men and >0.372 in women. Participants were divided into two groups according to the cutoff value of their baseline edema indices: High (>cutoff value) and Low (≤cutoff value). Survivors during the first year after PD initiation were divided into two groups according to the initial and 1-year edema index: Non-improvement (maintenance of criteria in the initial Low group during the year) and Other (all participants except those in the Non-improvement group). RESULTS: In total, 631 patients were enrolled in the present study. The cutoff value of the edema index for 1-year mortality was >0.371 in men and >0.372 in women. The respective mean initial RRF values (mL·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)) in the Low and High groups, respectively, were 4.88 ± 4.09 and 4.21 ± 3.28 in men (P = 0.108), and 3.19 ± 2.57 and 2.98 ± 2.70 in women (P = 0.531). There were no significant differences between groups in either sex. The respective mean RRF values at 1 year after PD initiation in the Low and High groups, respectively, were 3.56 ± 4.35 and 2.73 ± 2.53 in men, and 2.80 ± 2.36 and 1.85 ± 1.51 in women. RRF at 1 year after PD initiation was higher in the Low group than in the High group (men: P = 0.027; women: P = 0.001). In men, the cumulative 5-year survival rates were 78.7% and 46.2% in the Low and High groups, respectively, whereas in women, rates were 77.2% and 58.8% in the Low and High groups, respectively. For survivors during the first year after PD initiation, the Non-improvement group was associated with a poor survival rate compared with the Other group for both sexes. CONCLUSION: A high edema index was associated with mortality in incident PD patients at baseline and follow-up. The edema index may be used as a new marker for predicting mortality in PD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4718511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47185112016-01-30 Clinical Significance of the Edema Index in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Kang, Seok Hui Choi, Eun Woo Park, Jong Won Cho, Kyu Hyang Do, Jun Young PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Proper monitoring for volume overload is important to improve prognosis in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The association between volume status and residual renal function (RRF) remains an unresolved issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between the edema index and survival or RRF in incident PD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified all adults who underwent PD. The edema index was defined as the ratio of extracellular fluid to total body fluid. Participants with available data regarding survivorship or non-survivorship during the first year after PD initiation were included in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The cutoff value of the edema index for 1-year mortality was >0.371 in men and >0.372 in women. Participants were divided into two groups according to the cutoff value of their baseline edema indices: High (>cutoff value) and Low (≤cutoff value). Survivors during the first year after PD initiation were divided into two groups according to the initial and 1-year edema index: Non-improvement (maintenance of criteria in the initial Low group during the year) and Other (all participants except those in the Non-improvement group). RESULTS: In total, 631 patients were enrolled in the present study. The cutoff value of the edema index for 1-year mortality was >0.371 in men and >0.372 in women. The respective mean initial RRF values (mL·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)) in the Low and High groups, respectively, were 4.88 ± 4.09 and 4.21 ± 3.28 in men (P = 0.108), and 3.19 ± 2.57 and 2.98 ± 2.70 in women (P = 0.531). There were no significant differences between groups in either sex. The respective mean RRF values at 1 year after PD initiation in the Low and High groups, respectively, were 3.56 ± 4.35 and 2.73 ± 2.53 in men, and 2.80 ± 2.36 and 1.85 ± 1.51 in women. RRF at 1 year after PD initiation was higher in the Low group than in the High group (men: P = 0.027; women: P = 0.001). In men, the cumulative 5-year survival rates were 78.7% and 46.2% in the Low and High groups, respectively, whereas in women, rates were 77.2% and 58.8% in the Low and High groups, respectively. For survivors during the first year after PD initiation, the Non-improvement group was associated with a poor survival rate compared with the Other group for both sexes. CONCLUSION: A high edema index was associated with mortality in incident PD patients at baseline and follow-up. The edema index may be used as a new marker for predicting mortality in PD patients. Public Library of Science 2016-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4718511/ /pubmed/26785259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147070 Text en © 2016 Kang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kang, Seok Hui
Choi, Eun Woo
Park, Jong Won
Cho, Kyu Hyang
Do, Jun Young
Clinical Significance of the Edema Index in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
title Clinical Significance of the Edema Index in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
title_full Clinical Significance of the Edema Index in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
title_fullStr Clinical Significance of the Edema Index in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Significance of the Edema Index in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
title_short Clinical Significance of the Edema Index in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
title_sort clinical significance of the edema index in incident peritoneal dialysis patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26785259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147070
work_keys_str_mv AT kangseokhui clinicalsignificanceoftheedemaindexinincidentperitonealdialysispatients
AT choieunwoo clinicalsignificanceoftheedemaindexinincidentperitonealdialysispatients
AT parkjongwon clinicalsignificanceoftheedemaindexinincidentperitonealdialysispatients
AT chokyuhyang clinicalsignificanceoftheedemaindexinincidentperitonealdialysispatients
AT dojunyoung clinicalsignificanceoftheedemaindexinincidentperitonealdialysispatients