Cargando…

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

BACKGROUND: A COS represents an agreed minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all trials of a specific condition. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative aims to collate and stimulate the development and application of COS, by including data on r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gorst, Sarah L., Gargon, Elizabeth, Clarke, Mike, Blazeby, Jane M., Altman, Douglas G., Williamson, Paula R.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26785121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146444

Ejemplares similares

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
por: Davis, Katherine, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6(th) annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The core outcome measures in effectiveness trials (COMET) initiative: five years on
por: Williamson, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014)
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

COMET V meeting summary
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

COMET IV meeting summary
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities update (2015)
por: Gargon, E., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
por: Williamson, Paula R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
por: Wuytack, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic review
por: Karumbi, Jamlick, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
por: Tudur Smith, Catrin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A survey of core outcome set developers
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A mixed methods study of researchers’ experiences of developing core outcome sets
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Pragmatic approaches to mitigating missing data and research priorities to assess the effectiveness of interventions
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Feasibility of establishing a central repository for the individual participant data from research studies
por: Smith, Catrin Tudur, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Evaluation of an automatic article selection method for timelier updates of the Comet Core Outcome Set database
por: Norman, Christopher R, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Sharing Individual Participant Data from Clinical Trials: An Opinion Survey Regarding the Establishment of a Central Repository
por: Tudur Smith, Catrin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Collating the knowledge base for the COMET (core outcome measures in effectiveness trials) initiative - a systematic review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

How to choose and interpret a statistical test? An update for budding researchers
por: Najmi, Ahmad, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Improving core outcome set development: qualitative interviews with developers provided pointers to inform guidance
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Choosing outcomes for a core outcome set: does provision of feedback between delphi survey rounds help prioritise items?
por: Coulman, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Awareness and experiences on core outcome set development and use amongst stakeholders from low- and middle- income countries: An online survey
por: Karumbi, Jamlick, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A review of the description of patient withdrawal in trial protocols and patient information sheets (PIS)
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

“To have, to hold, from this day forward”: understanding current practice regarding the retention of trial participants
por: Daykin, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_fsvafqjcpgh4vee3esj3k732en