Cargando…

Patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial

Study question What is the effect of default test offers—opt-in, opt-out, and active choice—on the likelihood of acceptance of an HIV test among patients receiving care in an emergency department? Methods This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the emergency department of an urban teaching...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montoy, Juan Carlos C, Dow, William H, Kaplan, Beth C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6895
_version_ 1782410868079722496
author Montoy, Juan Carlos C
Dow, William H
Kaplan, Beth C
author_facet Montoy, Juan Carlos C
Dow, William H
Kaplan, Beth C
author_sort Montoy, Juan Carlos C
collection PubMed
description Study question What is the effect of default test offers—opt-in, opt-out, and active choice—on the likelihood of acceptance of an HIV test among patients receiving care in an emergency department? Methods This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the emergency department of an urban teaching hospital and regional trauma center. Patients aged 13-64 years were randomized to opt-in, opt-out, and active choice HIV test offers. The primary outcome was HIV test acceptance percentage. The Denver Risk Score was used to categorize patients as being at low, intermediate, or high risk of HIV infection. Study answer and limitations 38.0% (611/1607) of patients in the opt-in testing group accepted an HIV test, compared with 51.3% (815/1628) in the active choice arm (difference 13.3%, 95% confidence interval 9.8% to 16.7%) and 65.9% (1031/1565) in the opt-out arm (difference 27.9%, 24.4% to 31.3%). Compared with active choice testing, opt-out testing led to a 14.6 (11.1 to 18.1) percentage point increase in test acceptance. Patients identified as being at intermediate and high risk were more likely to accept testing than were those at low risk in all arms (difference 6.4% (3.4% to 9.3%) for intermediate and 8.3% (3.3% to 13.4%) for high risk). The opt-out effect was significantly smaller among those reporting high risk behaviors, but the active choice effect did not significantly vary by level of reported risk behavior. Patients consented to inclusion in the study after being offered an HIV test, and inclusion varied slightly by treatment assignment. The study took place at a single county hospital in a city that is somewhat unique with respect to HIV testing; although the test acceptance percentages themselves might vary, a different pattern for opt-in versus active choice versus opt-out test schemes would not be expected. What this paper adds Active choice is a distinct test regimen, with test acceptance patterns that may best approximate patients’ true preferences. Opt-out regimens can substantially increase HIV testing, and opt-in schemes may reduce testing, compared with active choice testing. Funding, competing interests, data sharing This study was supported by grant NIA 1RC4AG039078 from the National Institute on Aging. The full dataset is available from the corresponding author. Consent for data sharing was not obtained, but the data are anonymized and risk of identification is low. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT01377857.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4718971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47189712016-01-21 Patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial Montoy, Juan Carlos C Dow, William H Kaplan, Beth C BMJ Research Study question What is the effect of default test offers—opt-in, opt-out, and active choice—on the likelihood of acceptance of an HIV test among patients receiving care in an emergency department? Methods This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the emergency department of an urban teaching hospital and regional trauma center. Patients aged 13-64 years were randomized to opt-in, opt-out, and active choice HIV test offers. The primary outcome was HIV test acceptance percentage. The Denver Risk Score was used to categorize patients as being at low, intermediate, or high risk of HIV infection. Study answer and limitations 38.0% (611/1607) of patients in the opt-in testing group accepted an HIV test, compared with 51.3% (815/1628) in the active choice arm (difference 13.3%, 95% confidence interval 9.8% to 16.7%) and 65.9% (1031/1565) in the opt-out arm (difference 27.9%, 24.4% to 31.3%). Compared with active choice testing, opt-out testing led to a 14.6 (11.1 to 18.1) percentage point increase in test acceptance. Patients identified as being at intermediate and high risk were more likely to accept testing than were those at low risk in all arms (difference 6.4% (3.4% to 9.3%) for intermediate and 8.3% (3.3% to 13.4%) for high risk). The opt-out effect was significantly smaller among those reporting high risk behaviors, but the active choice effect did not significantly vary by level of reported risk behavior. Patients consented to inclusion in the study after being offered an HIV test, and inclusion varied slightly by treatment assignment. The study took place at a single county hospital in a city that is somewhat unique with respect to HIV testing; although the test acceptance percentages themselves might vary, a different pattern for opt-in versus active choice versus opt-out test schemes would not be expected. What this paper adds Active choice is a distinct test regimen, with test acceptance patterns that may best approximate patients’ true preferences. Opt-out regimens can substantially increase HIV testing, and opt-in schemes may reduce testing, compared with active choice testing. Funding, competing interests, data sharing This study was supported by grant NIA 1RC4AG039078 from the National Institute on Aging. The full dataset is available from the corresponding author. Consent for data sharing was not obtained, but the data are anonymized and risk of identification is low. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT01377857. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4718971/ /pubmed/26786744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6895 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Montoy, Juan Carlos C
Dow, William H
Kaplan, Beth C
Patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial
title Patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial
title_full Patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial
title_short Patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial
title_sort patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out hiv screening: randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6895
work_keys_str_mv AT montoyjuancarlosc patientchoiceinoptinactivechoiceandoptouthivscreeningrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dowwilliamh patientchoiceinoptinactivechoiceandoptouthivscreeningrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kaplanbethc patientchoiceinoptinactivechoiceandoptouthivscreeningrandomizedclinicaltrial