Cargando…

Characteristics of Eye-Position Gain Field Populations Determine Geometry of Visual Space

We have previously demonstrated differences in eye-position spatial maps for anterior inferotemporal cortex (AIT) in the ventral stream and lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) in the dorsal stream, based on population decoding of gaze angle modulations of neural visual responses (i.e., eye-position g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehky, Sidney R., Sereno, Margaret E., Sereno, Anne B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834587
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2015.00072
_version_ 1782410874143637504
author Lehky, Sidney R.
Sereno, Margaret E.
Sereno, Anne B.
author_facet Lehky, Sidney R.
Sereno, Margaret E.
Sereno, Anne B.
author_sort Lehky, Sidney R.
collection PubMed
description We have previously demonstrated differences in eye-position spatial maps for anterior inferotemporal cortex (AIT) in the ventral stream and lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) in the dorsal stream, based on population decoding of gaze angle modulations of neural visual responses (i.e., eye-position gain fields). Here we explore the basis of such spatial encoding differences through modeling of gain field characteristics. We created a population of model neurons, each having a different eye-position gain field. This population was used to reconstruct eye-position visual space using multidimensional scaling. As gain field shapes have never been well-established experimentally, we examined different functions, including planar, sigmoidal, elliptical, hyperbolic, and mixtures of those functions. All functions successfully recovered positions, indicating weak constraints on allowable gain field shapes. We then used a genetic algorithm to modify the characteristics of model gain field populations until the recovered spatial maps closely matched those derived from monkey neurophysiological data in AIT and LIP. The primary differences found between model AIT and LIP gain fields were that AIT gain fields were more foveally dominated. That is, gain fields in AIT operated on smaller spatial scales and smaller dispersions than in LIP. Thus, we show that the geometry of eye-position visual space depends on the population characteristics of gain fields, and that differences in gain field characteristics for different cortical areas may underlie differences in the representation of space.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4718998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47189982016-01-29 Characteristics of Eye-Position Gain Field Populations Determine Geometry of Visual Space Lehky, Sidney R. Sereno, Margaret E. Sereno, Anne B. Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience We have previously demonstrated differences in eye-position spatial maps for anterior inferotemporal cortex (AIT) in the ventral stream and lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) in the dorsal stream, based on population decoding of gaze angle modulations of neural visual responses (i.e., eye-position gain fields). Here we explore the basis of such spatial encoding differences through modeling of gain field characteristics. We created a population of model neurons, each having a different eye-position gain field. This population was used to reconstruct eye-position visual space using multidimensional scaling. As gain field shapes have never been well-established experimentally, we examined different functions, including planar, sigmoidal, elliptical, hyperbolic, and mixtures of those functions. All functions successfully recovered positions, indicating weak constraints on allowable gain field shapes. We then used a genetic algorithm to modify the characteristics of model gain field populations until the recovered spatial maps closely matched those derived from monkey neurophysiological data in AIT and LIP. The primary differences found between model AIT and LIP gain fields were that AIT gain fields were more foveally dominated. That is, gain fields in AIT operated on smaller spatial scales and smaller dispersions than in LIP. Thus, we show that the geometry of eye-position visual space depends on the population characteristics of gain fields, and that differences in gain field characteristics for different cortical areas may underlie differences in the representation of space. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4718998/ /pubmed/26834587 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2015.00072 Text en Copyright © 2016 Lehky, Sereno and Sereno. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Lehky, Sidney R.
Sereno, Margaret E.
Sereno, Anne B.
Characteristics of Eye-Position Gain Field Populations Determine Geometry of Visual Space
title Characteristics of Eye-Position Gain Field Populations Determine Geometry of Visual Space
title_full Characteristics of Eye-Position Gain Field Populations Determine Geometry of Visual Space
title_fullStr Characteristics of Eye-Position Gain Field Populations Determine Geometry of Visual Space
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of Eye-Position Gain Field Populations Determine Geometry of Visual Space
title_short Characteristics of Eye-Position Gain Field Populations Determine Geometry of Visual Space
title_sort characteristics of eye-position gain field populations determine geometry of visual space
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4718998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834587
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2015.00072
work_keys_str_mv AT lehkysidneyr characteristicsofeyepositiongainfieldpopulationsdeterminegeometryofvisualspace
AT serenomargarete characteristicsofeyepositiongainfieldpopulationsdeterminegeometryofvisualspace
AT serenoanneb characteristicsofeyepositiongainfieldpopulationsdeterminegeometryofvisualspace